Advertisement

A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective on Bimanual Coordination and Interference

  • Richard Ivry
  • Jörn Diedrichsen
  • Rebecca Spencer
  • Eliot Hazeltine
  • Andras Semjen

Abstract

We argue that bimanual coordination and interference depends critically on how these actions are represented on a cognitive level. We first review the literature on spatial interactions, focusing on the difference between movements directed at visual targets and movements cued symbolically. Interactions manifest during response planning are limited to the latter condition. These results suggest that interactions in the formation of the trajectories of the two hands are associated with processes involved in response selection, rather than interactions in the motor system. Neuropsychological studies involving callosotomy patients argue that these interactions arise from transcallosal interactions between cortically-based spatial codes. The second half of the chapter examines temporal constraints observed in bimanual movements. We propose that most bimanual movements are marked by a common event structure, an explicit representation that ensures temporal coordination of the movements. The translation of an abstract event structure into a movement with a particular timing pattern is associated with cerebellar function, although the resulting temporal coupling during bimanual movements may be due to the operation of other subcortical mechanisms. For rhythmic movements that do not entail an event structure, timing may be an emergent property. Under such conditions, both spatial and temporal coupling can be absent. The emphasis on abstract levels of constraint makes clear that limitations in bimanual coordination overlap to a considerable degree with those observed in other domains of cognition.

Key words

bimanual coordination spatial coupling temporal coupling response selection event timing callosotomy cerebellum neuropsychology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrams RA, Landgraf JZ (1990) Differential use of distance and location information for spatial localization. Percept Psychophys 47:349–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan LG (1979) The perception of time. Percept Psychophys 26:340–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amazeen PG, Amazeen EL, Turvey MT (1998) Dynamics of human intersegmental coordination: Theory and research. In: Rosenbaum DA, Collyer CE (eds), Timing of behavior: neural, computational, and psychological perspectives. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. pp 237–259Google Scholar
  4. Baldissera F, Cavallari P, Civaschi P (1982) Preferential coupling between voluntary movements of ipsilateral limbs. Neurosci Letters 34:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldissera F., Cavallari P, Marini G, & Tassone G (1991). Differential control of in-phase and anti-phase coupling of rhythmic movements of ipsilateral hand and foot. Exp Brain Res 83:375–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cardoso de Oliveira S. (2002) The neural basis of bimanual coordination: recent neurophysiological evidence and functional models. Acta Psych 110:139–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carson RG, Thomas J, Summers JI, Walters MR, Semjen A. (1997) The dynamics of bimanual circle drawing. Quart J Exp Psych 50A:664–683Google Scholar
  8. Cohen YE, Andersen RA (2002) A common reference frame for movement plans in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neurosci Rev 3:553–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collier GL, Wright CE (1995) Temporal rescaling of simple and complex ratios in rhythmic tapping. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:602–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Day BL, Lyon IN (2000) Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target. Exp Brain Res 130:159–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Desmurget M, Grafton S (2000) Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cog Sci 4:423–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diedrichsen J, Hazeltine E, Kennerley S, Ivry RB (2001) Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychol Sci 12: 493–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diedrichsen J, Ivry RB, Hazeltine E, Kennerley S, Cohen A (2003) Bimanual interference associated with the selection of target locations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29: 64–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duncan J (1977) Response selection errors in spatial choice reaction tasks. Quart J Exp Psychol 29: 415–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eliassen JC, Baynes K, Gazzaniga MS (1999) Direction information coordinated via the posterior third of the corpus callosum during bimanual movements. Exp Brain Res 128:573–577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Essens PJ (1986) Hierarchical organization of temporal patterns. Percept Psychophys 40: 69–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flanders M, Tillery SIR, Soechting JF (1992) Early stages in a sensorimotor transformation. Beh Brain Sci 15:309–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Franz EA, Waldie KE, Smith MJ (2000) The effect of callosotomy on novel versus familiar bimanual actions: a neural dissociation between controlled and automatic processes? Psychol Sci 11:82–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Franz EA, Eliassen JC, Ivry RB, Gazzaniga MS (1996) Dissociation of spatial and temporal coupling in the bimanual movements of callosotomy patients. Psychol Sci 7:306–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Franz EA, Zelaznik HN, McCabe G (1991) Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. Acta Psychol 77: 137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franz EA, Zelaznik HN, Swinnen S, Walter C (2001) Spatial conceptual influences on the coordination of bimanual actions: When a dual task becomes a single task. J Motor Behav 33:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glover S (in press) Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Beh Brain SciGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodale MA, Milner AD (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15:20–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goodale MA, Pelisson D, Prablanc C (1986) Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision ofthe hand or perception of target displacement. Nature 320:748–750PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guiard Y (1987) Asymmetric division of labour in human skilled bimanual action: the cinematic chain as a model. J Motor Beh 19: 86–517Google Scholar
  26. Haken H, Kelso JAS, Bunz H (1985) A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Bioi Cybern 51:347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hazeltine E, Diedrichsen J, Kennerley SW, Ivry RB (2003) Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection not the specification of motor parameters. Psychol Res 67:56–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Heilman KM, Rothi LJ, Valenstein E (1982) Two forms of ideomotor apraxia. Neurology 32:342–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heuer H (1993) Structural constraints on bimanual movements. Psychol Res 55:83–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heuer H, Kleinsorge T, Spijkers W, Steglich W (2001) Static and phasic cross-talk effects in discrete bimanual reversal movements. J Motor Beh 33:67–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heuer H, Spijkers W, Kleinsorge T, van der Loo H, Steglich C (1998) The time course of cross-talk during the simultaneous specification of bimanual movement amplitudes. Exp Brain Res 118:381–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hommel B, Musseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Beh Brain Sci 24:849–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ivry RB, Franz EA, Kingstone A, Johnston J (1998) The PRP effect following callosotomy: Uncoupling of lateralized response codes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:463–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ivry RB, Hazeltine E (1999) Subcortical locus of temporal coupling in the bimanual movements ofa callosotomy patient. Hum Mov Sci 18:345–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ivry RB & Richardson T (2002) Temporal control and coordination: The multiple timer model. Brain Cog 48:117–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ivry RB, Spencer RM, Zelaznik HN, Diedrichsen J (2002) The cerebellum and event timing. In: Highstein SM, Thach WT (eds) The cerebellum: recent developments in cerebellar research Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Vol 978 New York Academy of Sciences, NY. pp 302–317Google Scholar
  37. Jeka JJ & Kelso JAS (1995) Manipulating symmetry in the coordination dynamics of human movement J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:360–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Johnson-Frey SH (in press) Cortical mechanisms of human tool use. In Johnson-Frey SH (ed.) Taking action: cognitive neuroscience perspectives on the problem of intentional acts MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  39. Johnson-Frey SH, Funnell MG, Gazzaniga MS A dissociation between tool use skills and hand dominance: Insights from left-and right-handed callosotomy patients. Manuscript under reviewGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnson SA Rotte M, Grafton ST, Hinrichs H, Gazzaniga MS, Heinze HJ (2002) Selective activation of a parietofrontal circuit during implicitly imagined prehension. Neuroimage 17:1693–1704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kalaska JF, Cohen DA, Prudhomme M, Hyde ML (1990) Parietal area 5 neuronal activity encodesmovement kinematics not movement dynamics. Exp Brain Res 80:351–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Keele SW, Pokorny R, Corcos D, Ivry R (1985) Do perception and motor production share common timing mechanisms? Acta Psychologia 60:173–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kelso JAS, Southard DL, Goodman D (1979) On the coordination of two-handed movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 5:229–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kelso JAS (1984) Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. Am J Physio Reg Integ Comp 15:R1000–R1004Google Scholar
  45. Kennerley SW, Diedrichsen J, Hazeltine E, Semjen A, Ivry RB (2002) Callosotomy patients exhibit temporal and spatial uncouplingduring continuous bimanual movements. Nature Neuro 5:376–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Klapp S, Hill MD, Tyler JG, Martin ZE, Jagacinski RJ, Jones MR (1985) On marching to two different drummers: perceptual aspects of the difficulties. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:814–827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kornblum S, Hasbroucq T, Osman A (1990) Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A modeland taxonomy. Psychol Rev 97:253–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Krampe RT, Kliegl R, Mayr U, Engbert R, Vorberg D (2000) The fast and the slow of skilled bimanual rhythm production: Parallel vs integrated timing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:206–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kugler PN, Turvey MT (1987) Information natural law and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJGoogle Scholar
  50. Leipmann HMO (1907) De Ein Fall von linksseitiger Agraphie unf Apraxie bei rechtsseitinger. Lähmung Monatszeitschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie 10:214–227Google Scholar
  51. Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Baba DM (1984) Bimanual movement control: Information processing and interaction effects. Quart J Exp Psychol 16A:335–365Google Scholar
  52. Mechsner F, Kerzel D, Knoblich G, Prinz W (2001) Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature 414:69–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nambisan R, Diedrichsen J, Ivry RB, Kennerley S (2002) Two autopilots one brain: limitations and interactions during online adjustment of bimanual reaching movements. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Orlando FLGoogle Scholar
  54. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pashler H (1994) Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol Bul 116:220–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Perenin MT, Vighetto A (1988) Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. Brain 111:643–674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Perrig S, Kazennikov O, Wiesendanger M (1999) Time structure ofa goal-directed bimanual skill and its dependence on task constraints. Behav Brain Res 103:95–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Peters M (1994) Does handedness playa role in the coordination of bimanual movement? In: Swinnen SP, Heuer H, Massion J, Casaer P (eds) Interlimb coordination: Neural dynamical and cognitiveconstraints. Academic Press, London, pp 595–615Google Scholar
  59. Pisella L, Grea H, Tilikete C, Vighetto A, Desmurget M, Rode G, Boisson D, Rossetti Y (2000) An ‘automatic pilot’ for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nature Neuro 3:729–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Povel D-J (1981) Internal representation of simple temporal patterns. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 7:3–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Prablanc C, Martin O (1992) Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. J Neurophysio 67:455–469Google Scholar
  62. Riek S, Carson RG, Byblow WD (1992) Spatial and muscle dependencies in bimanual coordination. J Hum Mov Stud 23:251–265Google Scholar
  63. Robertson SD, Zelaznik HN, Lantero DA, Bojczyk KG, Spencer RM, Doffin JG, Schneidt T (1999) Correlations for timing consistency among tapping and drawing tasks: Evidence against a single timing process for motor control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:1316–1330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rushworth MF, Nixon PD, Passingham RE (1997) Parietal cortexand movement I Movement selection and reaching. Exp Brain Res 117:292–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schluter ND, Krams M, Rushworth MF, Passingham RE (2001) Cerebral dominance for action in the human brain: the selection of actions. Neuropsychologia 39:105–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schluter ND, Rushworth MF, Passingham RE, Mills KR (1998) Temporary interference in human lateral premotor cortex suggests dominance for the selection of movements A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain 121:785–799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schmidt RA, Heuer H, Ghodsian D, Young DE (1998) Generalized motor programs and units of action in bimanual coordination. In: Latash, ME (ed) Progress in motor control Vol 1: Bernstein straditions in movement studies. Human Kinetics, Champaign IL, pp 329–360Google Scholar
  68. Semjen A (2002) On the timing basis of bimanual coordination in discrete and continuous tasks. Brain Cog 48:133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Semjen A, Ivry RB (2001) The coupled oscillator model of between-hand coordination in alternate-hand tapping: A reappraisal. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:251–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Semjen A, Summers JI, Cattaert D (1995) Hand coordination in bimanual circle drawing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:1139–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Serrien DJ, Wiesendanger M (2000) Temporal control of a bimanual task in patients with cerebellar dysfunction. Neuropsychologia 38:558–565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Serrien DJ, Nirkko AC, Lovblad KO, Wiesendanger M (2001) Damage to the parietal lobe impairs bimanual coordination. Neuroreport 12:2721–2724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Spencer RMC, Zelaznik HN, Diedrichsen J, Ivry RB (2003) Disrupted timing of discontinuous but not continuous movements by cerebellar lesions. Science 300:1437–1439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Spijkers W, Heuer H (1995) Structural constraints on the performance of symmetrical bimanual movements with different amplitudes. Quart J Exp Psychol: Human Experimental Psychology 48:716–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Steglich C, Heuer H, Spijkers W, Kleinsorge T (1999) Bimanual coupling during the specification of isometric forces. Exp Brain Res 129:302–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stucchi N, Viviani P (1993) Cerebral dominance and asynchrony between bimanual two-dimensional movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:1200–1220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Swinnen SP, Dounskaia N, Duysens J (2002) Patterns of bimanual interference reveal movement encoding within a radial egocentric reference frame. J Cog Neuro 14:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Swinnen SP, Dounskaia N, Walter CB, Serrien DJ (1997) Preferred and induced coordination modes during the acquisition of bimanual movements with a 2:1 ratio. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:1087–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tuller B, Kelso JAS (1989) Environmentally-specified patterns of movement coordination in normal and split-brain subjects. Exp Brain Res 75:306–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Turvey MT (1990) Coordination. Am Psychol 45:938–953Google Scholar
  81. Vos PG, Mates J, Kruysbergen NW (1995) The perceptual centre of a stimulus as the cue for synchronization to a metronome: Evidence from asynchronies. Quart J Exp Psychol 48A:1024–1040Google Scholar
  82. Weigelt C, Cardoso De Oliveira S (2003) Visuomotor transformations affect bimanual coupling. Exp Brain Res 148:439–450PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Whiting HTA (Ed) Human motor actions: Bernstein reassessed Amsterdam: North Holland (1984) Advances in Psychology Series Vol 17Google Scholar
  84. Wimmers RH, Beek PJ, Vanwieringen PCW (1992) Phase-transitions in rhythmic tracking movements: a case ofunilateral coupling. Hum Mov Sci 11: 217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zelaznik HM, Spencer RM, Doffin J (2000) Temporal precision in tapping and circle drawing movements at preferred rates is not correlated: Further evidence against timing as a general purpose ability. J Motor Beh 32:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zelaznik HM, Spencer RM, Ivry RB (2002) Dissociation of explicit and implicit timing processes in repetitive tapping and drawing movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28:575–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Ivry
    • 1
  • Jörn Diedrichsen
    • 1
  • Rebecca Spencer
    • 1
  • Eliot Hazeltine
    • 2
  • Andras Semjen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Helen Wills Neuroscience InstituteUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of IowaUSA
  3. 3.CNRS MarseilleFrance

Personalised recommendations