Development of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication (The MacCAT-CA)

  • Norman G. Poythress
  • Richard J. Bonnie
  • John Monahan
  • Randy Otto
  • Steven K. Hoge
Part of the Perspectives in Law & Psychology book series (PILP, volume 15)

Abstract

The research described in Chapter 3 established that the MacSAC-CD was a reliably-scored, valid measure of criminal defendants’ ability to participate in the legal process, that was also grounded in a legal theory of competence. The MacSAC-CD, however, was judged not appropriate for clinical-forensic use for a number of reasons. Some of the items lacked face validity for the legal setting, preliminary findings indicated that some of the MacSAC-CD measures yielded redundant information (e.g., paraphrase and recognition measures of understanding), and administration time for the MacSAC-CD ranged from 1.5 to 2.0 hours (which was significantly longer than the time required to administer any of the existing competence assessment instruments). This argued for development of a briefer competence assessment instrument.

Keywords

Brief Psychiatric Rate Scale Criminal Defendant Jail Inmate Classification Utility Brief Psychiatric Rate Scale Total Score 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norman G. Poythress
    • 1
  • Richard J. Bonnie
    • 2
  • John Monahan
    • 2
  • Randy Otto
    • 1
  • Steven K. Hoge
    • 3
  1. 1.University of South FloridaTampaUSA
  2. 2.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  3. 3.CharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations