Planning Container Terminal Layouts Considering Equipment Types and Storage Block Design
Currently, several container terminals are being expanded, redesigned or newly built. In all those cases the layout of the container terminal has to be designed. We discuss different technologies which can be used for container terminal operation and describe their impact on the terminal layout. Different container terminal layout categories are defined. For a layout which is typical for the use of automated rail-mounted gantry cranes we propose a procedure to calculate promising storage yard configurations. The results show that smaller block widths lead to higher yard performances, but also to higher cost. Using the proposed block design problem, we are able to calculate all non-dominated solutions, which enables terminal planners to choose a solution for their specific situation. Moreover, we analyze the impact of the reefer racks distribution on the yard performance. The results show that an equal distribution of reefer racks over the existing storage blocks allows the best workload distribution.
KeywordsContainer Terminal Quay Crane Horizontal Transport Transfer Point Layout Planning
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Annala I (2007) Shuttle applications offer mega results. Kalmar around the world (3):4–5Google Scholar
- Asef-Vaziri A, Khoshnevis B, Rahimi M (2008) Design and analysis of an automated container handling system in seaports. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management 3(1/2):112–126Google Scholar
- Brinkmann B (2005) Seehäfen Planung und Entwurf. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Ficke S, Schütt H (2008) ConRoCAPS – Modelling Intermodal Terminals to Calculate their Capacity. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Harbour, Maritime & Multimodal Logistics Modeling & Simulation, DIPTEM Press, Genova, pp 246–250Google Scholar
- Kalmar Industries (2010) KALMAR E-DRIVE® ESC W STRADDLE CARRIERS. www.kalmarind.com/show.php?id=1020636, accessed August 25, 2010
- Petering MEH (2008) Parallel versus Perpendicular Yard Layouts for Seaport Container Transshipment Terminals: An Extensive Simulation Analysis. In: Proceedings of the International Trade and Freight Transportation Conference (Ayia Napa, Cyprus), CD-ROM Publication, pp 117–127Google Scholar
- Saanen YA, Valkengoed MV (2005) Comparison of Three Automated Stacking Alternatives by Means of Simulation. In: WSC ’05: Proceedings of the 37th Conference on Winter Simulation, Winter Simulation Conference, pp 1567–1576Google Scholar
- Wiese J, Kliewer N, Suhl L (2009a) A Survey of Container Terminal Characteristics and Equipment Types. Technical Report 0901, DS&OR Lab, University of Paderborn, PaderbornGoogle Scholar
- ZPMC (2009) Shanghai Zhenhua Heavy Industry Co.Ltd – ZPMC’S Ten Technology Achievements of RTG. http://www.zpmc.com/view.php?cid=26&tid=105&page=5, accessed August 25, 2010