Technology and the Challenge of Aging

Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on Aging book series (Int. Perspect. Aging, volume 9)

Abstract

The aging of populations is a global phenomenon. At the present time, approximately 10 % of the world’s population are aged 60 years and over, but the proportion is projected to increase to about 20 % by 2050. While the population worldwide is growing at around 1 % per annum, the number of people aged over 80 is growing at 4 % per annum. Moreover, the phenomenon of population aging is not limited to the developed countries. Currently 64 % of older people live in less developed regions, but this figure will rise to 80 % by 2050 (HelpAge International, 2012).

References

  1. Avgerou, C., & McGrath, K. (2007). Power, rationality, and the art of living through socio-­technical change. MIS Quarterly, 31(2), 295–315.Google Scholar
  2. Beringer, R., Sixsmith, A., Campo, M., Brown, J., & McCloskey, R. (2011). The “acceptance” of ambient assisted living: Developing an alternative methodology to this limited research lens. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Proceedings from the 9th International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics LCNS 6719ICOST 2011. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Bhachu, A., Hine, N., & Woolrych, R. (2012). The role of assistive technology in supporting ­formal carers. In J. Augusto et al. (Eds.), Handbook of ambient assisted living (pp. 283–303). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  4. Biggs, S., Hendricks, J., & Lowenstein, A. (2003). The need for theory in gerontology. Introduction. In S. Biggs, A. Lowenstein, & J. Hendricks (Eds.), The need for theory: Critical approaches to social gerontology (pp. 1–12). New York: Baywood.Google Scholar
  5. Birren, J. E., & Bengtson, V. L. (1988). International perspectives on families, aging and social support. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Bowles, K. H., & Baugh, A. C. (2007). Applying research evidence to optimize telehomecare. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 22, 5–15.Google Scholar
  7. Celler, B. G., Earnshaw, W., Ilsar, E. D., Betbedermatibet, L., Harris, M. F., Clark, R., et al. (1995). Remote monitoring of health status of the elderly at home. A multidisciplinary project on aging at the University of New South Wales. International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, 40(2), 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooperrider, D., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. San Francisco, CA: Case Western Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  9. Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennia.Google Scholar
  10. Cushman, M., & Klecun, E. (2006). Non-users of computers in South London. Their experiences and aspirations for use. London: Department of Information Systems, London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  11. Davidoff, S., Lee, K., Yiu, C., Dey, A., & Zimmerman, J. (2006). Principles of smart home control. In P. Dourish & A. Friday (Eds.), Ubicomp (Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, Vol. 4206, pp. 19–34). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Davidson, M. C., & Santorelli, J. M. (2008). Network effects: An introduction to broadband ­technology & regulation. Washington, DC: U.S. Chamber of Commerce.Google Scholar
  13. Eisma, R., Dickinson, A., Goodman, J., Syme, A., Tiwari, L., & Newell, A. F. (2004). Early user involvement in the development of Information Technology-related products for older people. Universal Access in the Information Society, 3(2), 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EU. (2007). European i2010 initiative on e-Inclusion. Retrieved January 6, 2012 from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/einclusion/docs/i2010_initiative/comm_native_com_2007_0694_f_en_acte.pdf
  15. Federal Interagency Forum on Aging. (2004). Older Americans 2004. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  16. Floeck, M., Litz, L., & Spellerberg, A. (2012). Monitoring patterns of inactivity in the home with domotics networks. In Handbook of ambient assisted living (pp. 258–282). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish (2nd ed.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  18. Freeman, J., & Lessiter, J. (2001). ITC-UsE Ease of Use and Knowledge of Digital and Interactive Television: Results. Independent Television Commission: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/itc/uploads/UsE_report.pdf.Google Scholar
  19. Fudge, N., Wolfe, C. D. A., & McKevitt, C. (2007). Involving older people in health research. Age and Ageing, 36, 492–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gee, E. M., & Gutman, G. M. (2000). The overselling of population aging: Apocalyptic demography, intergenerational challenges, and social policy. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Guo, B., Zhang, D., & Imai, M. (2010). Enabling user-oriented management for ubiquitous ­computing. Journal of Computer Networks, 54(16), 2840–2855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. HelpAge International. (2012). http://www.helpage.org/resources/ageing-data/
  23. Hwang, M.-Y., Hong, J.-C., Hao, Y.-W., & Jong, J.-T. (2011). Elders’ usability, dependability, and flow experiences on embodied interactive video games. Educational Gerontology, 37(8), 715–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kearns, W., Nams, V., & Fozard, J. (2010). Wireless fractal estimation of tortuosity in movement paths related to cognitive impairment in assisted living facility residents. Methods of Information in Medicine, 49(6), 592–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Korupp, S. E., & Szydlik, M. (2005). Causes and trends of the digital divide. European Sociological Review, 21(4), 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lawton, M. P., & Nahemow, L. (1973). Ecology and the aging process. In C. Eisdorfer & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 657–668). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  27. Lloyd-Sherlock, P., McKee, M., Ebrahim, S., Gorman, M., Greengross, S., Prince, M., et al. (2012). Population ageing and health. The Lancet, 379(9823), 1295–1296. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60519-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luis, C. A., Loewenstein, D. A., Acevedo, A., Barker, W. W., & Duara, R. (2003). Mild cognitive impairment: directions for future research. Neurology, 61, 438–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marin, S., & Mulvenna, M. (2012). Delivering technology-enriched health and social care: Policy context for user-focused research. In J. Augusto et al. (Eds.), Handbook on AAL for healthcare, well-being and rehabilitation (pp. 369–386). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  30. McCreadie, C., & Tinker, A. (2005). The acceptability of assistive technology to older people. Ageing and Society, 25, 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGill, I., & Beaty, L. (2001). Action learning: A guide for professional management and educational development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. McLean, R., & Blackie, N. M. (2004). Customer and company voices in e-Commerce: A qualitative analysis. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 7(24), 243–249.Google Scholar
  33. Meyer, I., Muller, S., & Kubitschke, L. (2012). AAL markets: Knowing them, researching them. Evidence from European Research. In J. Augusto et al. (Eds.), Handbook on AAL for healthcare, well-being and rehabilitation (pp. 346–368). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mihailidis, A., Boger, J., Czarnuch, S., Jiancaro, T., & Hoey, J. (2012). Ambient assisted living technology to support older adults with dementia with activities of daily living. In J. Augusto et al. (Eds.), Handbook of ambient assisted living (pp. 304–330). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  35. Miskelly, F. (2001). Assistive technology in elderly care. Age and Ageing, 30, 455–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Müller, S., & Sixsmith, A. (2008). User requirements for ambient assisted living: Results of the SOPRANO project. Gerontechnology, 7(2), 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Namazi, S., Sixsmith, A., Glaesser, U., & O’Rourke, N. (2012, June). Developing a mobile experience sampling tool for seniors with bipolar disorder. Paper presented at the World Conference of the International Society of Gerontechnology, Eindhoven.Google Scholar
  38. Pare, G., Jaana, M., & Sicotte, C. (2007). Systematic review of home telemonitoring for chronic diseases: The evidence base. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14, 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Petersen, R. C. (2011). Mild cognitive impairment. New England Journal of Medicine, 364, 2227–2234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Piau, A., Nourhashémi, F., Hein, C., Caillaud, C., & Vellas, B. (2011). Progress in the development of new drugs in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, 15(1), 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramadier, T. (2004). Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: The case of urban studies. Futures, 36(4), 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of usability testing. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Sauvé, L., & Kaufman, D. (Eds.) (2010). Jeux et simulations éducatifs: Etudes de cas et leçons apprises [Educational games and simulations: Case studies and lessons learned]. Saint-Foi, Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
  44. Schmid, I., Marks, B., Sixsmith, A., Jung, K., Baines, S., & Carson, J. (2012). Music player for dementia care homes. Gerontechnology, 11(2), 419.Google Scholar
  45. Sixsmith, A. (2006). New technologies to support independent living and quality of life for people with dementia. Alzheimer’s Care Quarterly, 7(3), 194–202.Google Scholar
  46. Sixsmith, A. (2011). A user-driven approach to developing ambient assisted living systems for older people. In J. Soar, R. Swindell, & P. Tsang (Eds.), Intelligent technologies for bridging the grey divide (pp. 30–45). New York: Information Science.Google Scholar
  47. Sixsmith, A. (2012). International initiatives on development of information and communication technologies to assist older people. Gerontechnology, 11(2).Google Scholar
  48. Sixsmith, A., & Johnson, N. (2004). A smart sensor to detect falls of the elderly. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 3(2), 42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sixsmith, A., Orpwood, R., & Torrington, J. (2010). Developing a music player for people with dementia. Gerontechnology, 9(3), 421–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sixsmith, A., & Sixsmith, J. (2000). Smart home technologies: meeting whose needs? Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 6(1) Supplement, 190–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sixsmith, A., & Sixsmith, J. (2008). Ageing in place in the United Kingdom. Ageing International, 32(3), 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steen, M., Kuijt-Evers, L., & Klok, J. (2007). Early user involvement in research and design ­projects – a review of methods and practices. Paper for the 23rd EGOS Colloquium (European Group for Organizational Studies).Google Scholar
  53. Townsend, P. (1986). Ageism and social policy. In C. Phillipson & A. Walker (Eds.), Ageing and social policy: A critical assessment (pp. 15–44). Aldershot, Hampshire: Gower.Google Scholar
  54. Townsend, P. (2006). Policies for the aged in the 21st century: More ‘structured dependency’ or the realisation of human rights? Ageing and Society, 26, 161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van den Hove, S. (2006). Between consensus and compromise: acknowledging the negotiation dimension in participatory approaches. Land Use Policy, 23, 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wickson, F., Carew, A. L., & Russell, A. W. (2006). Transdisciplinary research: Characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures, 38(9), 1046–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., & Allen, R. E. S. (2011). The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. The Gerontologist. doi:10.1093/geront/gnr098.
  58. Wimo, A., & Prince, M., (2010). The global economic impact of dementia. ADI World Alzheimer Report 2010.Google Scholar
  59. Wister, A., Sixsmith, A., Adams, R., & Sinden, D. (2009). Fact book on aging in British Columbia (5th ed.). Vancouver, BC: Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  60. Woolrych, R., & Sixsmith, A. (2012). Challenges of user-centred research in the development of ambient assisted living systems. In M. Donnelly, C. Paggetti, C. Nugent, & M. Mokhtari (Eds.), Impact analysis of solutions for chronic disease prevention and management (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7251, pp. 1–8). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gerontology Research CentreSimon Fraser University, Harbour CentreVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations