Flexible Service Systems

  • Artem Polyvyanyy
  • Mathias Weske
Part of the Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy book series (SSRI)

Abstract

Service science combines scientific, management, and engineering disciplines to improve the understanding of how service systems cooperate to create business value. Service systems are complex configurations of people, technologies, and resources that coexist in a common environment of service provisioning. While the general concepts of service science are understood and agreed upon, the representation of service systems using models is still in its infancy. In this chapter, we look at business processes and their role in properly representing service systems. We propose flexible process graphs, a high-level process modeling language, and extend it in order to specify service systems and their compositions within shared environments in a flexible way. The discussion in this chapter is the first step towards a formal description of service science environment, including service systems, networks, and whole ecology.

Keywords

Service science Service systems Flexible process graph Flexible service systems Modeling 

References

  1. Anderson J.C., Kumar N. and Narus J.A. (2007) Value Merchants: Demonstrating and Documenting Superior Value in Business Markets. Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Berge C. (1985) Graphs and Hypergraphs. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  3. Berge C. (1989) Hypergraphs: Combinatorics of Finite Sets. Elsevier, Amsterdam.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Burbeck S. (2000) The Tao of e-business services: The evolution of Web applications into service-oriented components with Web services. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-tao/. Accessed November 2009.
  5. Gottschalk K. (2000) Web services architecture overview: The next stage of evolution for e-business. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/w-ovr/. Accessed November 2009.
  6. Hardwick P., Khan B. and Langmead J. (1999) An Introduction to Modern Economics, 5th edn. Financial Times/Prentice Hall, Harlow, England.Google Scholar
  7. Lusch R.F., Vargo S.L. and Wessels G. (2008) Toward a conceptual foundation for service science: Contributions from service-dominant logic. IBM Systems Journal 47(1), 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Newcomer E. and Lomow G. (2004) Understanding SOA with Web Services. Addison-Wesley, Maryland.Google Scholar
  9. O’Sullivan A. and Sheffrin S. (2005) Economics: Principles and Tools, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.Google Scholar
  10. Polyvyanyy A. and Weske M. (2008a) Hypergraph-based modeling of ad-hoc business processes. In: Business Process Management Workshops, Springer Verlag, LNBIP, vol. 17, pp. 278–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Polyvyanyy A. and Weske M. (2008b) Flexible process graph: A prologue. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS), Springer Verlag, LNCS, vol. 5331, pp. 427–435.Google Scholar
  12. Ricketts J.A. (2008) Reaching the Goal: How Managers Improve a Services Business Using Goldratt’s Theory of Constraints. IBM Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Silberschatz A., Korth H.F. and Sudarshan S. (1997) Database System Concepts, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, Hightstown.MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Spohrer J., Maglio P.P., Bailey J. and Gruhl D. (2007) Steps toward a science of service systems. IEEE Computer 40(1), 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Spohrer J., Vargo S.L., Caswell N. and Maglio P.P. (2008) The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  16. Vargo S.L. and Lusch R.F. (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing 68, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vargo S.L. and Lusch R.F. (2006) The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions, “Service-Dominant Logic: What It Is, What It Is Not, What It Might Be”. M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  18. Vickers G. (1983) Human Systems are Different. Harper & Row, London.Google Scholar
  19. Weske M. (2007) Business Process Management Concepts Languages Architectures. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  20. Williamson O.E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science and Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Artem Polyvyanyy
    • 1
  • Mathias Weske
  1. 1.Business Process Technology GroupHasso Plattner Institute at the University of PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations