Quantitative Risk Assessment in Supply Chains: A Case Study Based on Engineering Risk Analysis Concepts

Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 152)

Abstract

In recent years, numerous events have shown the extent to which companies, and subsequently their supply chains, are vulnerable to uncertain events. We have witnessed many supply chain malfunctions (with substantial consequences) due to supply and demand disruptions: affected companies reported, on average, a 14% increase in inventories, an 11% increase in cost, and a 7% decrease in sales in the year following the disruption (Hendricks and Singhal 2005). Component shortages, labor strikes, natural and manmade disasters, human errors, changes in customer taste, technological failures, malicious activities, and financially distressed and, in extreme cases, bankrupt partners, among many others, can cause disruptions in supply chains:

References

  1. Aichlmayr M (2001) Future of JIT: time will tell. Transport Distrib 18–23Google Scholar
  2. Apostolakis GE (2004) How useful is quantitative risk assessment? Risk Anal 24(3):515–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett L (2001) Cisco’s $2.25 billion mea culpa. CNET news.com. May 9Google Scholar
  4. Cachon GP (2003) Supply chain coordination with contracts. In: de Kok AG, Graves SC (eds.) Handbooks in operations research and management science - supply chain management: design, coordination and operation. Kluwer, pp. 229–340Google Scholar
  5. Chen F, Federgruen A (2000) Mean-variance analysis of basic inventory models. Working paper, Columbia University, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  6. Chopra S, Sodhi MS (2004) Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 46(1):53–61Google Scholar
  7. Coleman BJ, Jennings KM (1998) The UPS strike: lessons for just-in-timers. Prod Inventory Manag J Fourth Quarter, 63–67Google Scholar
  8. Davis T (1993) Effective supply chain management. Sloan Manag Rev 35–46Google Scholar
  9. Deleris LA, Elkins D, Paté-Cornell ME (2004) Analyzing losses from hazard exposure: a conservative probabilistic estimate using supply chain risk simulation. In Ingalls RG, Rossetti MD, Smith JS, Peters BA (eds.) Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  10. Deleris LA, Erhun F (2005) Risk management in supply networks using Monte-Carlo simulation. In: Kuhl ME, Steiger NM, Armstrong FB, Joines JA (eds.) Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  11. Drake EM, Kalelkar AS (1979) Risk analysis of LNG systems. Paper presented at the Cryogenic Engineering Conference, Madison, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  12. Erhun F, Gonçalves P, Hopman J (2007) Managing new product transitions. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 48(3):73–80 (Reprint Number 48311)Google Scholar
  13. Garrick BJ (1984) Recent case studies and advancements in probabilistic risk assessment. Risk Anal 4(4):267–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Health & Safety Executive (1978) Canvey – an investigation of potential hazard from operations in the Canvey Island/Thurrock area, London, HMSOGoogle Scholar
  15. Health & Safety Executive (1981) Canvey – a second report, London, HMSOGoogle Scholar
  16. Hendricks KB, Singhal VR (2005) Association between supply chain glitches and operating performance. Manag Sci 51(5):695–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hicks DA (1999) A four step methodology for using simulation and optimization technologies in strategic supply chain planning. In: Farrington PA, Nembhard HB, Sturrock DT, Evans GW (eds.) Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1215–1220. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  18. Howard RA, Matheson JE (1984) Influence diagrams. In: Howard RA, Matheson JE (eds.) The principles and applications of decision analysis, Vol. 2 pp. 719–762. SDG, Menlo Park, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  19. Ingalls RG (1999) CSCAT: The Compaq supply chain analysis tool. In: Farrington PA, Nembhard HB, Sturrock DT, Evans GW (eds.) Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1201–1206. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  20. Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirwan B (1994) A guide to practical human reliability assessment. Taylor & Francis, Bristol, PAGoogle Scholar
  22. Kleindorfer PR, Saad GH (2005) Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Prod Oper Manag, 14(1):53–68. SpringGoogle Scholar
  23. Koch C (2004) Nike rebounds: How (and Why) Nike recovered from its supply chain disaster. CIO MagazineGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumamoto H, Henley EJ (1996) Probabilistic risk assessment and management for engineers and scientists, 2nd edn. IEEE, NYGoogle Scholar
  25. Latour A (2001) Trial by fire: a blaze in albuquerque sets off major crisis for cell-phone giants – Nokia handles supply shock with Aplomb as Ericsson of Sweden gets burned – Was Sisu the difference? Wall St J p. A1. April 29Google Scholar
  26. Lee HL (1996) Effective management of inventory and service through product and process redesign. Oper Res 44:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee HL, Billington C (1992) Managing supply chain inventory: pitfalls and opportunities. Sloan Manage Rev 65–73Google Scholar
  28. Lemos R Report: rise in virus attacks costs firms dearly. CNET News.com. March 19, (2004)Google Scholar
  29. Macalister T (2002) Land rover settles parts squabble. Guardian February 19Google Scholar
  30. Martínez-de Albéniz V, Simchi-Levi D (2005) A portfolio approach to procurement contracts. Prod Oper Manag 14(1):90–114. SpringGoogle Scholar
  31. Moore J (1999) Increase in memory chip prices after Taiwan quake to tarnish earnings. CNN Money October 18Google Scholar
  32. Murphy JV (2005) Resiliency: bouncing back when disaster strikes – A conversation with Yossi Sheffi. SupplyChainBrain.comGoogle Scholar
  33. Newman RG (1989) Single sourcing short-term savings versus long-term problems. J Purch Mater Manag 20–24. SummerGoogle Scholar
  34. Paté-Cornell ME (1993) Learning from the piper alpha accident: a post-mortem analysis of technical and organizational factors. Risk Anal 13(2):215–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Paté-Cornell ME, Fishbeck PS (1993) Probabilistic risk analysis and risk-base priority scale for the tiles of the space shuttle. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 40(3):221–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Paté-Cornell ME, Lakats LM, Murphy DM, Gaba DM (1997) Anesthesia patient risk: a quantitative approach to organizational factors and risk assessment. Risk Anal 17(4):511–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paté-Cornell ME, Tagaras G (1986) Risk costs for new dams: economic analysis and effects of monitoring. Water Resour Res 22(1):5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peck H, Juttner U (2002) Risk management in the supply chain. Centre for Logistics and Transportation, School of Management, Cranfield University, Bedford, UKGoogle Scholar
  39. Pender K (2002) Lockout’s effect on stocks. San Francisco Chronicle p. B1. October 3Google Scholar
  40. Prater E, Biehl M, Smith MA (2001) International supply chain agility, tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty. Int J Oper Prod Manag 21(5/6):823–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Raiffa H (1968) Decision analysis. Addison Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  42. Rasmussen J, Duncan K, Leplat J (eds.) (1987) New technology and human error. Wiley, Chichester, NYGoogle Scholar
  43. Reason J (1997) Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate, Brookfield, VTGoogle Scholar
  44. Rice JB (2005) MG rover’s supply chain disruption. Supply Chain Strategy Article Reprint No: P0507DGoogle Scholar
  45. Sachon M, Paté-Cornell ME (2000) Delays and safety in airline maintenance. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 67:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sheffi Y (2005) The resilient enterprise: overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  47. Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236:280–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tang CS (2006) Perspectives in supply chain risk management. Int J Prod Econ 103(2):451–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tomlin B (2006) On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply-chain disruption risks. Manag Sci 52(5):639–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Treece JB (1997) Fire will slow Toyota exports to U.S. Automotive News, Crain Communications, Inc February 10Google Scholar
  51. Tufte ER (1983) The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics, Cheshire, ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  52. Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  53. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior. 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  54. Waters-Fuller N (1995) Just-in-time purchasing and supply: a review of the literature. Int J Oper Prod Manag 15(9):220–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wreathall J, Nemeth C (2004) Assessing risk: the role of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) in patient safety improvement. Qual Safety Health Care 13(3):206–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yazlali Ö, Erhun F (2006) Managing demand uncertainty with dual supply contracts. Working paper, Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305Google Scholar
  57. Zsidisin GA, Panelli A, Upton R (2000) Purchasing organization involvement in risk assessments, contingency plans, and risk management: an exploratory study. Supply Chain Manag Int J 5(4):187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer New York 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IBM Research – Smarter Cities Technology CenterDublin 15Ireland

Personalised recommendations