Advertisement

Identity Construction in Sociohistorical Context

  • Ian BurkittEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to trace the historical roots of the modern Western sense of identity as constituted by the possession of an ‘inner’ self. In contrast to other authors who have traced this notion to Puritanism and Romanticism, or to the Scottish Enlightenment, I begin with the Greco-Roman conception of persona, focusing on the way this concept indicated both self as mask or public presentation and self as the true nature of the individual. This was expanded with the Stoic idea of self-mastery through moderation as a route to self-improvement. I then argue that the tension between self as public persona and self as a private possession grew in the sixteenth century under the influence of the humanist movement. In particular, Erasmus was the first to employ the theatrical metaphor of the world as a stage with all the people on it playing their parts. Erasmus also reinterpreted the Stoic ideal of self-mastery at a time when social controls were moving away from external forces onto the individual psychological plane, so that people were expected to control themselves. In yet a different power structure during the eighteenth century, Adam Smith reinterpreted Stoicism in the context of a commercial capitalist economy, emphasising how we shape our own behaviour by seeing ourselves as we imagine others do. This sets the scene for the different views of self and identity found in psychology today, particularly in symbolic interactionism.

Keywords

Sixteenth Century Public Life Identity Construction Public Role Impartial Spectator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Augustijn, C. (1991). Erasmus: His life, works, and influence. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  2. Augustine (397/1998). The confessions (M. Boulding, Trans.). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  3. Aurelius, M. (170–180/1992). Meditations (A. Farquharson, Trans.). London: David Campbell Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (C. E. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. F. (1987). How the self became a problem: A psychological review of historical research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Burkitt, I. (2008). Social selves: Theories of self and society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Burnyeat, M. (1982). Idealism and Greek philosophy: What Descartes saw and Berkeley missed. Philosophical Review, 90, 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costelloe, T. M. (1997). Contrast or coincidence: George Herbert Mead and Adam Smith on self and society. History of the Human Sciences, 10(2), 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Danziger, K. (1997). The historical formation of selves. In R. D. Ashmore & L. Jussim (Eds.), Self and identity: Fundamental issues (pp. 137–159). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Elias, N. (2000). The civilizing process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Erasmus, D. (1511/1941). The praise of folly (H. H. Hudson, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1988a). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (1988b). The care of the self: The history of sexuality (Vol. 3). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. Gash, A. (1998). Shakespeare, carnival and the sacred: ‘The winter’s tale’ and ‘Measure for measure’. In R. Knowles (Ed.), Shakespeare and Carnival: After Bakhtin (pp. 177–210). Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Gill, C. (2006). The structured self in Hellenistic and Roman thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gill, C. (2008). The ancient self: Issues and approaches. In P. Remes & J. Sihvola (Eds.), Ancient philosophy of the self (pp. 35–56). Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life (1990 ed.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. Hall, E. (1994). Introduction. In Sophocles, Antigone, Oedipus the king, Electra (pp. ix–xxxvi). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Harbus, A. (2002). The medieval concept of the self in Anglo-Saxon England. Self and Identity, 1, 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mann Phillips, M. (1949). Erasmus and the northern renaissance. London: Hodder & Soughton.Google Scholar
  22. Mauss, M. (1938/1985). A category of the human mind: The notion of the person; the notion of self. In M. Carrithers, S. Collins, & S. Lukes (Eds.), The category of the person: Anthropology, philosophy, history (pp. 1–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mead, G. H. (1964). The social self. In G. H. Mead & A. J. Reck (Eds.), Selected writings (pp. 142–149). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Momigliano, A. (1985). Marcel Mauss and the quest for the person in Greek biography and autobiography. In M. Carrithers, S. Collins, & S. Lukes (Eds.), The category of the person: Anthropology, philosophy, history (pp. 83–92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Remes, P. (2008). Inwardness and infinity of selfhood: From Plotinus to Augustine. In P. Remes & J. Sihvola (Eds.), Ancient philosophy of the self (pp. 155–176). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another (K. Blamey, Trans.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Seigel, J. (2005). The idea of the self: Thought and experience in Western Europe since the seventeenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, A. (1759/1966). Theory of moral sentiments. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
  29. Sorabji, R. (2006). Self: Ancient and modern insights about individuality, life, and death. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Strozier, R. M. (2002). Foucault, subjectivity, and identity: Historical constructions of subject and self. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Trilling, L. (1971). Sincerity and authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Problems of general psychology (N. Minick, Trans.). In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), Thinking and speech (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  34. Weber, M. (1905/1985). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. (T. Parsons, Trans.) London: Counterpoint.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Sciences and HumanitiesUniversity of BradfordBradfordUK

Personalised recommendations