Internalizing External Costs of Transport with a Focus on Climate Change

Chapter
Part of the Transportation Research, Economics and Policy book series (TRES)

Abstract

From an economic perspective, the impacts of traffic noise, air pollution, or CO2 emissions are external effects as the emitter does not pay for the damages caused to others – especially to future generations. This paper focuses on current challenges in the transport sector to internalize transport externalities with economic instruments, in particular with regard to mitigate CO2 emissions. It will be argued that many published economic models, in particular neoclassical economic models, are not appropriate to internalize all external effects properly. However, some approaches of ecological economics appear to be favorable if the external effects are subject to high uncertainty and occur in the far future – as in the case of climate change impacts. It presupposes a clear target setting for every type of externalities in terms of safe minimum values and calls for applying a variety of instruments with optimally triggered intensities to achieve the targets at minimum costs. The optimal mix of instruments may vary over space to take into account the different economic, social, and environmental structures.

References

  1. Anable J (2008) The cost-effectiveness of carbon abatement in the transport sector. Project report, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumol WJ, Oates WE (1988) The theory of environmental policy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Bickel P, Schmid S (2002) Marginal costs case study 9D: urban road and rail case studies Germany. Project report of UNITE (UNIfication of accounts and marginal costs for Transport Efficiency), StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  4. BMU (Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, and Nuclear Safety) (2006) Nationaler Allokationsplan 2008–2012 für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. CfIT (Commission for Integrated Transport UK) (2007) Transport and climate change, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeCicco J, Ross M (1996) Recent advances in automotive technology and the cost-effectiveness of fuel economy improvement. Transp Res D 1(2):79–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EC (European Commission) (1998) Implementing the community strategy to reduce CO2 emissions from cars: an environmental agreement with the European automobile industry, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. COM (98) 495 final, Brussels, 29.07.1998Google Scholar
  9. EC (European Commission) (2006) Mid-term review of the Transport White Paper: keep Europe moving – sustainable mobility for our continent, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  10. EC (European Commission) (2009) EU energy and transport in figures, Statistical pocketbook, DG Energy and Transport, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  11. INFRAS, CE Delft, Fhg-ISI, University of Gdansk (2008) Internalisation Measures and Policies for All external Cost of Transport (IMPACT), DelftGoogle Scholar
  12. Edenhofer O, Luderer G, Flachsland Ch, Füssel H-M (2008) A global contract on climate change, Background Paper for the Conference on “A Global Contract Based on Climate Justice: The Need for a New Approach Concerning International Relations”, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  13. Erdmann G (2009) CO2-Emissionen von Batterie-Elektrofahrzeugen. Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen 59(10):66–71Google Scholar
  14. Eurostat (2008) Energy and transport in figures, LuxemburgGoogle Scholar
  15. Eurostat (2010) Eurostat database. www.ec.europa.eu/eurostat
  16. Farber M, Proops J, Speck S (1999) Capital and time in ecological economics. Edward Elgar cheethamGoogle Scholar
  17. INFRAS and IWW (Institute of Economic Policy Research) (2004) External costs of transport. Project report, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  18. IPCC (Intergovernemmental Panel on Climate Change) (1999) Aviation and the global atmosphere. Special report of IPCC working group I and III and the scientific assessment panel of montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. IPCC (Intergovernemmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policy makers, GeneveGoogle Scholar
  20. JAMA (Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association) (2008) Reducing CO2 emissions in the global road transport sector, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  21. Jochem P (2009) A CO2 emission trading scheme for German road transport: assessing the impacts using a meso economic model with multi-agent attributes. Nomos, Baden-BadenGoogle Scholar
  22. Jochem P, Gerbracht H, Ihrig J, Fichtner W (2010) Integrating battery electric vehicles into the German electricity market. Presentation at the 12th WCTR, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  23. Koopman TC (1975) Concepts of optimality and their uses. Math Program 11(1):212–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. LeBlanc LJ, Rothengatter W (1982) Gleichgewicht in Verkehrsnetzen. Das Basismodell und einige Erweiterungen für integrierte Verkehrsplanungen. Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft 3:28–115Google Scholar
  25. Maibach M, Schreyer C, Sutter D, van Essen HP, Boon BH, Smokers R, Schroten A, Doll C, Pawlowska B, Bak M (2008) Handbook on estimation of external costs in the transport sector, DelftGoogle Scholar
  26. Meade JE (1952) External economies and diseconomies in a competitive situation. Econ J 62(245):54–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nordhaus W (2007) The Stern review on the economics of climate change. Yale, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  28. Papandreou AA (1994) Externality and institutions. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Pigou AC (1920) The economics of welfare, edn 1952. Macmillan and Co, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  30. Rothengatter W (2000) External costs of transport. In: Polak JB, Heertje A (eds) Analytical transport economics: an international perspective. Edward Elgar, Northhampton, pp 79–116Google Scholar
  31. Rothengatter W (2003a) Environmental concepts. In: Hensher DA, Button KJ (eds) Handbook of transport and the environment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 9–36Google Scholar
  32. Rothengatter W (2003b) How good is first best? Marginal cost and other pricing principles for user charging in transport. Transp Policy 10(2):121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schafer A (2000) Carbon dioxide emissions from world passenger transport. Transp Res Rec 1738:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stern N (2006) Stern review on the economics of climate change. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. T&E (Transport and the Environment) (2008) MEPs capitulate on deadlines, targets and penalties on fuel efficiency deal, T&E Press Release, 10.12.08Google Scholar
  36. TNO, IEEP (Institute for European Environmental Policy), and LAT (Laboratory of Applied Thermodynamics) (2006) Review and analysis of the reduction potential and costs of technological and other measures to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger cars. Project report, DelftGoogle Scholar
  37. WBCSD (World Business Council for Sustainable Development) (2004) Mobility 2030, GeneveGoogle Scholar
  38. WHO (World Health Organization) (2003) Health aspects of air pollution with particulate matter, ozone and nitrogen dioxide. World Health Organization, BonnGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Industrial Production (IIP)Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations