Back to Practice, a Decade of Research in E-Government

Chapter

Abstract

E-government is a multidisciplinary field of research based initially on empirical insights from practice. Efforts to theoretically found the field have opened perspectives from multiple research domains. The goal of this chapter is to review evolution of the e-government field from an institutional and an academic point of view. Our position is that e-government is an emergent multidisciplinary field of research in which focus on practice is a prominent characteristic. Each chapter of the book is then briefly presented and is positioned according to a vision of the e-government domain of research.

References

  1. AND06.
    Andersen, K.V., Henriksen, H.Z., “E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 23, pp. 236–248, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BAU09.
    Baumgarten, J., Chui, M., “E-government 2.0”, McKinsey Quarterly, no. 4, 2009. Available online athttp://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Business_Technology/E-government_20_2408, retrieved July 2nd, 2010.
  3. BER09.
    Berntzen, L., Olsen, M.G., “Benchmarking e-government: A comparative review of three international benchmarking studies”, Third International Conference on Digital Society, Cancun, Mexico, pp. 77–82, February 1–7, 2009.Google Scholar
  4. COD07.
    Codagnone, C., Wimmers, M.A., (Editors), Road mapping e-Government Research, eGovRTD2020 Project consortium, 2007. Available online athttp://www.egovrtd2020.org/, retrieved Oct. 26th, 2009.
  5. DAW08.
    Dawes S., “An exploratory framework for future e-government research investments,” 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2008.Google Scholar
  6. EBR04.
    Ebrahim, Z., Irani Z., Al Shawi S., “A Strategic Framework for E-government Adoption in Public Sector Organisations,” Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), New York, August 6–8, 2004.Google Scholar
  7. EURC09.
    European Commission, e-Government Benchmarking Reports, “eGovernment Benchmark Survey 2009: Smarter, Faster, Better eGovernment,” Available online athttp://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/i2010/benchmarking/index_en.htm, retrieved July 2nd, 2010.
  8. GRÖ04a.
    Grönlund A., “State of the art in e-gov research – A survey,” Proceedings EGOV 2004, LNCS 3183, pp. 178–185, Springer, 2004.Google Scholar
  9. GRÖ04b.
    Grönlund A., Horan T.A., “Introducing e-gov: History, definitions and issues,” Communication of the AIS, vol. 15, pp. 713–729, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. GRÖ06.
    Grönlund A., Andersson, A., “E-gov research quality improvements since 2003: More rigor, but research (perhaps) redefined,” Proceedings EGOV 2006, LNCS 4084, pp. 1–12, Springer, 2006.Google Scholar
  11. HEE07.
    Heeks, R., Bailur, S., “Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice”, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 24, pp. 243–265, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. HOV07.
    Hovy, E., “Chapter 3: An outline for the foundations of digital government research”, In H. Chen et al. (Eds), Digital Government: Advanced Research and Case Studies, pp. 43–59, Springer, Berlin, 2007.Google Scholar
  13. KOH08.
    Koh, C.E., Prybutok, V.R., Zhang, X., “Measuring e-government readiness”, Information & Management, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 540–546, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. LAY01.
    Layne, K., Lee, J., “Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model”, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 122–136, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. SCH07.
    Scholl, H.J., “Chapter 2: Discipline or interdisciplinary study domain? Challenges and promises in electronic government research”, In H. Chen et al. (eds), Digital government: Advanced research and case studies, pp. 21–41, Springer, Berlin, 2007.Google Scholar
  16. SIA04.
    Siau K., Long Y., “Factors impacting e-government development,” International Conference on Information Systems 2004, Washington DC, USA, Dec. 11–15, 2004.Google Scholar
  17. UN05.
    United Nations’ Global E-Government Development Report 2005. Available online athttp://www2.unpan.org/egovkb/global_reports/05report.htm, retrieved Jul. 2nd, 2010.
  18. UN08.
    United Nations’ Global E-Government Development Report 2008. Available online athttp://www2.unpan.org/egovkb/global_reports/08report.htm, retrieved Jul. 2nd, 2010.
  19. UN10.
    United Nations’ Global E-Government Development Report 2010. Available online athttp://www2.unpan.org/egovkb/global_reports/10report.htm, retrieved Jul. 2nd, 2010.
  20. YIL07.
    Yildiz, M., “E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations and ways forward,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 24, pp. 646–665, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer New York 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Insitut Télécom, Telecom Business SchoolEvryFrance

Personalised recommendations