Towards a Model-Driven Approach to Information System Evolution
Models have always played an important role in information systems (IS) design: typically, entity–relationship diagrams or object models have been used to describe data structures and the relationships between them. Model transformation and code generation technologies have given models an even more important role: as part of the source code for the system. This “model-driven” approach, however, has application beyond initial implementation. This chapter shows how subsequent changes to a design, captured as an “evolution model”, can be used to generate the data transformations required for the migration of data between different versions of the same system. The intention is to facilitate the adaptation of systems to changing requirements, using model-driven technologies for the rapid development of new versions, by reducing the cost and increasing the reliability of each migration step.
KeywordsModel-driven Information systems Data migration model evolution
- 1.J. Bézivin. On the unification power of models. Software and Systems Modeling. 4(2). 2005.Google Scholar
- 2.D.S. Frankel, Model Driven Architecture. Wiley 2003.Google Scholar
- 3.J. Bézivin, F. Jouault, P. Rosenthal and P. Valduriez. Modeling in the large and modeling in the small. In Proceedings of European MDA Workshops: Foundations and Applications. Springer LNCS 3599. 2005.Google Scholar
- 4.P.P. Chen. The entity-relationship model – toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1). 1976.Google Scholar
- 5.B. Thalheim. Fundamentals of Entity-relationship Modeling. Springer. December 1999.Google Scholar
- 6.M. Blaha and W. Premerlani. Object-Oriented Modeling and Design for Database Applications. Prentice-Hall. 1998.Google Scholar
- 7.J. Davies, J. Welch, A. Cavarra and E.Crichton. On the generation of object databases using booster. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS). 2006.Google Scholar
- 8.Object Management Group (OMG). Unified Modeling Language (UML) Infrastructure, Version 2.2. http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/09-02-04.pdf. Accessed May 2009.
- 9.Object Management Group (OMG). OCL 2.0 Specifications, version 2. http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/05-06-06.pdf. Accessed May 2009.
- 10.J. Banerjee, W. Kim, H. Kim and H. Korth. Semantics and implementation of schema evolution in object-oriented databases. Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD 87. ACM Press. 1987.Google Scholar
- 11.F. Ferrandina, T. Meyer, R. Zicari, G. Ferran and J. Madec. Schema and database evolution in the O2 object database system. In Proceedings of the 21th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB). 1995.Google Scholar
- 12.K. Claypool, J. Jin and E. Rundensteiner. SERF: schema evolution through an extensible, re-usable and flexible framework. In Proceedings of International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 1998.Google Scholar
- 13.M. Del Fabro, J. Bézivin, F. Jouault, E. Breton and G. Gueltas. AMW: a generic model weaver. In Proceedings of the 1ères Journées sur l'Ingénierie Dirigée par les Modèles. 2005.Google Scholar
- 14.F. Jouault and J. Bézivin. KM3: a DSL for Metamodel Specification. In Proceedings of 8th IFIP International Conference on Formal Methods for Open Object-Based Distributed Systems. Springer LNCS 4037. 2006.Google Scholar
- 15.F. Jouault and I. Kurtev. Transforming Models with ATL. In Proceedings of MoDELS 2005. Springer LNCS 3844. 2006.Google Scholar
- 16.T. Friedman. Risks and Challenges in Data Migrations and Conversions. Gartner Research. February 2009.Google Scholar
- 17.J. Hainaut, A. Cleve, J. Henrard and J. Hick. Migration of Legacy Information Systems. Software Evolution. Springer. 2008.Google Scholar
- 18.B. Bordbar, D. Draheim, M. Horn, I. Schulz and G. Weber. Integrated model-based software development, data access, and data migration. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference, MoDELS 2005. Springer LNCS 3713. 2005.Google Scholar
- 19.T. Friedman, M. Beyer and A. Bitterer. Magic Quadrant for Data Integration Tools. Gartner Research. http://mediaproducts.gartner.com/reprints/sas/vol5/article4/article4.html. Accessed July 2009.
- 20.A. Boronat, J. Pérez, J.A. Carsí and I. Ramos. Two experiences in software dynamics. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 10(4) (2004), 428–453.Google Scholar
- 21.C. Delgado, J. Samos and M. Torres. Primitive operations for schema evolution in ODMG databases. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Object-Oriented Information Systems (OOIS). Springer LNCS 2817. 2003.Google Scholar
- 22.B. Lerner. A model for compound type changes encountered in schema evolution. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 25(1). 2000.Google Scholar
- 23.A. Rashid, P. Sawyer and E. Pulvermueller. Flexible approach for instance adaptation during class versioning. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Object Oriented Information Systems. Springer LNCS 1944. 2000.Google Scholar
- 24.M. Fowler. Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code, Addison Wesley, 1999.Google Scholar
- 25.S.W. Ambler and P.J. Sadalage. Refactoring Databases: Evolutionary Database Design, Addison Wesley Professional, 2006.Google Scholar
- 26.A. Cicchetti, D. Di Ruscio and A. Pierantonio. A metamodel independent approach to difference representation. Journal of Object Technology, 6(9). 2007.Google Scholar
- 27.Y. Lin, J. Gray and F. Jouault. DSMDiff: A differentiation tool for domain-specific models. European Journal of Information Systems, 16 (4). 2007.Google Scholar
- 28.D. Kolovos, R. Paige and F. Polack. Model comparison: a foundation for model composition and model transformation testing. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Global Integrated Model Management. ACM. 2006.Google Scholar
- 29.http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emft/?project=compare. Accessed May 2009.