Hearing Capabilities of Loggerhead Sea Turtles (Caretta caretta) Throughout Ontogeny

  • Ashley L. LavenderEmail author
  • Soraya M. Bartol
  • Ian K. Bartol
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 730)


Sea turtles are one group of endangered marine animals potentially impacted by anthropogenic sound production. Similar to other migratory marine species, sea turtles occupy different ecological niches throughout ontogeny, each characterized by unique acoustic conditions. Developing sea turtle hatchlings remain in pelagic habitats but then migrate to shallower neritic waters to forage as juveniles and reproduce as adults. Near-shore habitats are typically inundated with low-frequency human-generated sounds (Hawkins and Myrberg 1983) including recreational boating, commercial shipping, and high-intensity signals associated with seismic exploration (Greene and Moore 1995).


Sound Pressure Level Acoustic Stimulus Life History Stage Seismic Exploration Pelagic Habitat 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Exploration and Production Sound and Marine Life Joint Industry Programme, International Association of Oil and Gas Producers, London, UK (JIP22 07–14). We also thank Ben Higgins and the helpful Protected Species Branch staff, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory, Galveston, TX.


  1. Bartol SM, Mellgren RL, Musick JA (2003) Visual acuity of juvenile loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta): A behavioral approach. Int J Comp Psychol 16:143–155.Google Scholar
  2. Bartol SM, Musick JA, Lenhardt M (1999) Auditory evoked potentials of the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta). Copeia 3:836–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blough D, Blough P (1977) Animal psychophysics. In: Honig WK, Staddon JER (eds) Handbook of operant behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 514–539.Google Scholar
  4. Bullock TH (1981) Neuroethology deserves more study of evoked responses. Neuroscience 6:1203–1215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corwin JT, Bullock TH, Schweitzer J (1982) Auditory brainstem response in five vertebrate classes. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 54:629–641.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Greene CR Jr, Moore SE (1995) Man-made noise. In: Richardson WJ, Greene CR Jr, Malme CI, Thomson DH (eds) Marine mammals and noise. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 101–158.Google Scholar
  7. Hawkins AD, Myrberg AA Jr (1983) Hearing and sound communication under water. In: Lewis B (ed) Bioacoustics: A comparative approach. Academic Press, London, pp 347–404.Google Scholar
  8. Kenyon TN, Ladich F, Yan HY (1998) A comparative study of hearing ability in fishes: The auditory brainstem response approach. J Comp Physiol A 182:307–318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Manton ML, Karr A, Ehrenfeld DW (1972) An operant method for the study of chemoreception in the green turtle, Chelonia mydas. Brain Behav Evol 5:188–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mellgren RL, Mann MA (1996) Comparative behavior of hatchling sea turtles. In: Keinath JA, Barnard DE, Musick JA, Bell BA (eds). NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-387, Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation, 20–25 February 1995, Hilton Head, SC, pp 202–204.Google Scholar
  11. Ridgway SH, Wever EG, McCormick JG, Palin J, Anderson JH (1969) Hearing in the giant sea turtle, Chelonia mydas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 64:884–890.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashley L. Lavender
    • 1
    Email author
  • Soraya M. Bartol
    • 2
  • Ian K. Bartol
    • 1
  1. 1.Old Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA
  2. 2.Virginia Wesleyan CollegeNorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations