The Cell as a Thermostat: How Much does it Know?

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 736)


How does bacterial thermotaxis compare to a simple wall thermostat? Elements with similar function can be found in the two, including a temperature-sensing element, an output switch, and an external control. But they differ in their origins. A thermostat is designed and made by humans and embodies their understanding of seasonal fluctuations in temperature and how these affect room comfort. By contrast, the bacterial system is self-contained and assembles according to information in its genome acquired by evolution. This information is far richer than anything carried by a thermostat and closer to the ‘knowledge’ that higher animals have about the world.


  1. 1.
    Salman H, Libchaber A (2007) A concentration-dependent switch in the bacterial response to temperature. Nat Cell Biol 9(9):1098–1100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sourjik V, Wingreen NS (2007) Turning to the cold. Nat Cell Biol 9(9):1029–1031PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berg HC (2004) E. coli in motion. In: Greenbaum E (ed) Biological and medical physics biomedical engineering. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wadhams GH, Armitage JP (2004) Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:1024–1037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hazelbauer GL, Falke JJ, Parkinson JS (2008) Bacterial chemoreceptors: high-performance signaling in networked arrays. Trends Biochem Sci 33(1):9–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tagkopoulos I, Liu Y-C, Tavazoie S (2008) Predictive internal representations underlie anticipatory behavior within microbial genetic networks. Science 320:1313–1317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physiology, Development and NeuroscienceUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations