Advertisement

The Policy Maker's Anguish: Regulating Personal Data Behavior Between Paradoxes and Dilemmas

  • Ramón Compañó
  • Wainer Lusoli
Conference paper

Abstract

Regulators in Europe and elsewhere are paying great attention to identity, privacy and trust in online and converging environments. Appropriate regulation of identity in a ubiquitous information environment is seen as one of the major drivers of the future Internet economy. Regulation of personal identity data has come to the fore including mapping conducted on digital personhood by the OECD; work on human rights and profiling by the Council of Europe andmajor studies by the European Commission with regard to self-regulation in the privacy market, electronic identity technical interoperability and enhanced safety for young people. These domains overlap onto an increasingly complex model of regulation of individuals' identity management, online and offline. This chapter argues that policy makers struggle to deal with issues concerning electronic identity, due to the apparently irrational and unpredictable behavior of users when engaging in online interactions involving identity management. Building on empirical survey evidence from four EU countries, we examine the first aspect in detail – citizens' management of identity in a digital environment. We build on data from a large scale (n = 5,265) online survey of attitudes to electronic identity among young Europeans (France, Germany, Spain, UK) conducted in August 2008. The survey asked questions about perceptions and acceptance of risks, general motivations, attitudes and behaviors concerning electronic identity. Four behavioral paradoxes are identified in the analysis: a privacy paradox (to date well known), but also a control paradox, a responsibility paradox and an awareness paradox. The chapter then examines the paradoxes in relation of three main policy dilemmas framing the debate on digital identity. The paper concludes by arguing for an expanded identity debate spanning policy circles and the engineering community.

Keywords

Young People Personal Data Data Protection Privacy Concern Digital Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Backhouse, J., Halperin, R.: A Survey on citizen’s trust in ID systems and authorities. Fidis Journal 1(Online) (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buckingham, D. ed.: Youth, identity, and digital media. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation series on digital media and learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Rosa, C., Cantrell, J., Havens, A., Hawk, J., Jenkins, L., Cellentani, D., Dalrymple, T., Olszewski, L., Smith, S., Storey, T.: Sharing, privacy and trust in our networked world. Online Computer Library Center, Dublin, OH (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dinant, J.-M., Lazaro, C., Poullet, Y., Lefever, N., Rouvroy, A.: Application of Convention 108 to the profiling mechanism: Some ideas for the future work of the consultative committee (T-PD). Council of Europe, T-PD, Strasbourg, France (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    EDPS: Opinion on the proposed multiannual Community programme on protecting children using the Internet and other communication technologies. EDPS, Brussels, Belgium (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Commission: Communication from the Commission – Towards a European e-justice Ssrategy. European Commission – DG JLS, Brussels, Belgium (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gallup: Confidence in information society. EC DG Information Society and Media: Brussels, Belgium (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gallup: Data protection in the European Union – Citizens’ perceptions. EC DG Justice, Liberty and Security: Brussels, Belgium (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gross, R., Acquisti, A.: Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In: Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, pp. 71–80. ACM Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hammarberg, T.: Strong data protection rules are needed to prevent the emergence of a surveillance society. Council of Europe, Commissioner for Human Rights, Strasbourg, France (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kuneva, M.: Key Challenges for Consumer Policy in the Digital Age. Roundtable on Digital Issues, London, 20 June (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lusoli, W., Miltgen, C.: Young People and Emerging Digital Services. An Exploratory Survey on Motivations, Perceptions and Acceptance of Risks, W. Lusoli, R. Compañó, and I. Maghiros, Editors. EC JRC Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Sevilla (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marcus, J. S., Carter, K., Robinson, N., Klautzer, L., Marsden, C., Reidenberg, J., Abder, C., Burton, C., Cooms, L., Kover, E., Poullet, Y., De Villenfagne, F., Dumortier F., Peake, A., Kamimura, K., Tanaka ,T.: Comparison of Privacy and Trust Policies in the Area of Electronic Communications. wik-Consult/RAND Europe, CLIP/CRID/GLOCOM, Bad Honnef, Germany (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Norberg, P.A., Horne D.R., Horne D.A.: The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs 41(1), 100–126 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    OECD: The Seoul declaration for the future of the Internet economy. Seoul, OECDMinisterial meeting, 18 June (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oomen, I., Leenes, R.: Privacy risk perceptions and privacy protection strategies. In: Proceedings of the First IFIP WW 11.6 Working Conference on Policies and Research in Identity Management. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paine, C. Reips, U.-D., Stieger, S., Joinson, A., Buchanan, T.: Internet users’ perceptions of ‘privacy concerns’ and ‘privacy actions’. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65(6), 526-536 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rundle,M. C., Blakley, B., Broberg, J., Nadalin, A., Olds, D., Ruddy,M.,Marcelo Thompson, M.,Mello Guimarães,M., Trevithick, P.: At a crossroads: "Personhood" and the digital identity in the information society. OECD, Paris, France (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schaaper, M.: Measuring security and trust in the online environment: a view using official data. EAS, DSTI, OECD, Paris (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shu, Y., Kanliang, W.: The influence of information sensitivity compensation on privacy concern and behavioral intention. ACM SIGMIS Database 40(1), 38–51 (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    The Economist: Primates on Facebook: even online, the neocortex is the limit. The Economist (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tufekci, Z.: Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science Technology and Society 28(1), 20–36 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS)European Commission - Directorate General Joint Research Centre (JRC)  
  2. 2.European Commission - Directorate General Joint Research Centre (JRC), Visiting Research FellowUniversity of Chester  

Personalised recommendations