The Emergence of the Open Networked “i-Learning” Model

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

The most significant forces that are changing the business world and the society behaviors in this beginning of the twenty-first century can be identified into the globalization of the economy, technological evolution and convergence, change of the workers’ expectations, workplace diversity and mobility, and mostly, knowledge and learning as major organizational assets. But which type of ­learning dynamics must be nurtured and pursued within the organizations, today, in order to generate valuable knowledge and its effective applications? After a brief discussion on the main changes observable in management, ICT and society/workplace in the last years, this chapter aims to answer to this question, through the proposition of the “Π-shaped” profile (a new professional archetype for leading change), and through the discussion of the open networked “i-Learning” model (a new framework to “incubate” innovation in learning processes). Actually, the “i” stands for “innovation” (to highlight the nature of the impact on traditional ­learning model), but also it stands for “incubation” (to underline the urgency to have new environments in which incubating new professional profiles). Specifically, the main key characteristics at the basis of the innovation of the learning processes will be ­presented and described, by highlighting the managerial, technological and societal aspects of their nature. A set of operational guidelines will be also ­provided to ­activate and sustain the innovation process, so implementing changes in the strategic dimensions of the model. Finally, the “i-Learning Radar” is presented as an operational tool to design, communicate and control an “i-Learning experience”. This tool is represented by a radar diagram with six strategic dimensions of a ­learning initiative.

Keywords

i-Learning Radical innovation in human capital creation T-shaped people Π-shaped people Learning incubator Learner-centered communities Personal learning environment Personal learning network 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ally M (2008) Foundations of Educational Theory for Online Learning. In: Anderson T and Elloumi F (Eds.) The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabasca University. CanadaGoogle Scholar
  2. Afuah A and Tucci C L (2003) Internet Business Models and Strategies. McGraw-Hill. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson C (2006) The Long Tail. Hyperion. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Baets W and Van der Linden G (2003) Virtual Corporate Universities: A Matrix of Knowledge and Learning for the New Digital Dawn. Kluwer. Norwell.Google Scholar
  5. Bruner J S (1966) Toward a Theory of Instruction. Belknap Press. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Chesbrough H W (2003) The Era of Open Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review 4(3):74–81.Google Scholar
  7. Coase R H (1937) The Nature of the Firm. Economica 4(16):386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dewey J (1966) Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. The Free Press. New York.Google Scholar
  9. Digenti D (1999) Collaborative Learning: A Core Capability for Organizations in the New Economy. The Society for Organizational Learning Journal 1(2):45–57.Google Scholar
  10. Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson R, Silverberg G, and Soete L (1988) Technical Change and Economic Theory. Columbia University Press. London.Google Scholar
  11. Dunning J (1997) Alliance Capitalism and Global Business. Routledge. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eisenhardt K M and Sull D N (2001) Strategy as Simple Rules. Harvard Business Review 2001:106–116.Google Scholar
  13. Freeman C and Perez C (1988) Structural Crisis of Adjustment. Business Cycles and Investment Behavior. In: Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson R, Silverberg G, and Soete L (Eds.) Technical Change and Economic Theory. Columbia University Press. London.Google Scholar
  14. Garvin D A (1993) Building a Learning Organization. Harvard Business Review 71(4):78–92.Google Scholar
  15. Ghoshal S and Bartlett C A (1999) The Individualized Corporation. Harper Collins. New York.Google Scholar
  16. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P and Trow M (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage. London.Google Scholar
  17. Harris J (2001) The Learning Paradox: Gaining Success and Security in a World of Change. Capstone. Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  18. Hayashi S, Kurokawa T (2009) Japan’s Critical Issues on IT Human Resource, Science & Technology Trends 30:23–40.Google Scholar
  19. Hitt M A, Ireland R D and Hoskinsson R E (2001) Strategic Management: Competitiveneness and Globalization. Southwestern. Oklahoma City.Google Scholar
  20. Hitt M A, Ireland R D, Camp S M and Sexton D L (2002) Strategic Entrepreneurship: Integrating Entrepreneurial and Strategic Management Perspectives. In: Hitt M A, Ireland D R, Camp S M and Sexton D L (eds.) Strategic Entrepreneruship: Creating a New Mindset. Blackwell. Boston.Google Scholar
  21. Kolb D A (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. McBer and Company. Boston.Google Scholar
  22. Leonard-Barton D (1992) The Factory as a Learning Laboratory. Sloan Management Review 34(1):23–38.Google Scholar
  23. Lipsey R G (1998) Technology Policies in Neo-Classical and Structuralist-Evolutionary Models. STI Review 22:31–74.Google Scholar
  24. Malone T W (2004) The Future of Work – How the New Order of Business Will Shape Your Organization, Your Management Style, and Your Life. Harvard Business School Press. Boston.Google Scholar
  25. Marquardt M J (2002) Building the Learning Organization. Davies Black. Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  26. McKnight W, Vaaler P M, and Katz R L (2001) Creative Destruction. MIT Press. Boston.Google Scholar
  27. Piaget J (1977) The Development of Thought. Equilibration of Cognitive Structures. Basil Blackwell. Oxford.Google Scholar
  28. Popper K R (1963) Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Routledge and Kegan Paul. New York.Google Scholar
  29. Romano A (2008) Costruire l’Università Post-Fordista. Cacucci. Bari.Google Scholar
  30. Romano A, De Maggio M and Del Vecchio P (2009) The Emergence of a New Managerial Mindset. In: Romano A (ed.) Open Business Innovation Leadership. Palgrave. London, UK.Google Scholar
  31. Secundo G, Margherita A, Elia G, and Passiante G (2009a) A Service Science Perspective to Develop Engineering Systems Professionals, ASEE Global Colloquium on Engineering Education. 12th–15th October, 2009. Budapest. Hungary.Google Scholar
  32. Secundo G, Margherita A and Elia G (2009b) Networked Learning for Human Capital Development. In: A. Romano (Ed.) Open Business Innovation Leadership. Palgrave. London, UK.Google Scholar
  33. Siemens G (2004) Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning. 2(1) http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm Accessed 11 Dec 2009.
  34. Silberglitt R, Antón P S, Howell D R and Wong A (2006) The Global Technology Revolution 2020 – In Depth Analyses. RAND Corporation. Santa Monica.Google Scholar
  35. Skinner B F (1953) Science and Human Behavior. Macmillan. New York.Google Scholar
  36. Tapscott D (1996). The Digital Economy. McGraw-Hill. New York.Google Scholar
  37. Tapscott D (2006). Winning with the Enterprise 2.0. New Paradigm Learning Corporation. Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  38. Tapscott D and Williams A D (2006) Wikinomics. Portfolio. London, UK.Google Scholar
  39. Teece D, Pisano G and Schuen A (1997) Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal 18:509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Venkatraman S and Sarasvathy S D (2001) Strategy and entrepreneurship: Outlines of an untold story. In: Hitt M A, Freema E, Harrison J S (eds.) Handbook of Strategic Management. Blackwell. Oxford.Google Scholar
  41. Vest C M (2006) Educating Engineers for 2020 and Beyond. In: The Bridge 36(2):38–44. National Academy of Engineering (NAE). Washington.Google Scholar
  42. Vygotskii L S (1978) Mind in society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  43. Watson J B (1913) Psychology as a Behaviorist View. Psychological Review 20(2):158–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Euro-Mediterranean Incubator – Department of Engineering InnovationUniversity of SalentoLecceItaly

Personalised recommendations