Assembly of K11-Linked Ubiquitin Chains by the Anaphase-Promoting Complex

  • Michael Rape
Part of the Subcellular Biochemistry book series (SCBI, volume 54)


Ubiquitin chains are assembled, when a ubiquitin is connected to one of the seven Lys residues or the amino-terminus of a ubiquitin molecule already attached to a substrate. K48-linked ubiquitin chains target proteins for degradation by the 26S proteasome, while those chains connected through K63 regulate intracellular signaling cascades independently of protein degradation. Although all other linkages are detected in cells, their function is not well understood. Here, we review recent progress in delineating substrates, enzymes and functions of K11-linked ubiquitin chains. In particular, we discuss the mechanism of assembly for K11-linked chains by the human anaphase-promoting complex and its physiological E2s UbcH10 and Ube2S and we speculate on the particularities of these noncanonical chains in cells.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kerscher O, Felberbaum R, Hochstrasser M. Modification of proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2006 22:159–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mukhopadhyay D, Riezman H. Proteasome-independent functions of ubiquitin in endocytosis and signaling. Science 2007; 315:201–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hochstrasser M. Lingering mysteries of ubiquitin-chain assembly. Cell 2006; 124:27–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bennett EJ, Shaler TA, Woodman B et al. Global changes to the ubiquitin system in Huntigton’s disease. 2007; 448:704–8.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xu P, Duong DM, Seyfried NT et al. Quantitative proteomics reveals the function of unconventional ubiquitin chains in proteasomal degradation. Cell 2009; 137:133–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spence J, Sadis S, Haas AL et al. A ubiquitin mutant with specific defects in DNA repair and multiubiquitination. Mol Cell Biol 1995; 15:1265–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grabbe C, Dikic I. Functional roles of ubiquitin-like domain (ULD) and ubiquitin-binding domain (UBD) containing proteins. Chem Rev 2009; 109:1481–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen ZJ, Sun LJ. Nonproteolytic functions of ubiquitin in cell signaling. Mol Cell 2009; 33:275–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baboshina OV, Haas AL. Novel multiubiquitin chain linkages catalyzed by the conjugating enzymes E2EPF and RAD6 are recognized by 26 S proteasome subunit 5. J Biol Chem 1996; 271:2823–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nishikawa H, Ooka S, Sato K et al. Mass spectrometric and mutational analyses reveal Lys-6-linked polyubiquitin chains catalyzed by BRCA1-BARD1 ubiquitin ligase. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:3916–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jin L, Williamson A, Banerjee S et al. Mechanism of ubiquitin-chain formation by the human anaphase-promoting complex. Cell 2008; 133:653–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tokunaga F, Sakata S, Saeki Y et al. Involvement of linear polyubiquitylation of NEMO in NFkappa-B activation. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11:123–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rahighi S, Ikeda F, Kawasaki M et al. Specific recognition of linear ubiquitin chains by NEMO is important for NFkappa-B activation. Cell 2009; 136:1098–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peng J, Schwartz D, Elias JE et al. A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination. Nat Biotechnol 2003; 21:921–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Williamson et al. Identification of a physiological E2 module for the human Anaphase-Promoting Complex. PNAS 2009; under revision.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Richly H, Rape M, Braun S et al. A series of ubiquitin binding factors connects CDC48/p97 to substrate multiubiquitylation and proteasomal targeting. Cell 2005; 120:73–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alexandru G, Graumann J, Smith GT et al. UBXD7 binds multiple ubiquitin ligases and implicates p97 in HIF1alpha turnover. Cell 2008; 134:804–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peters JM. The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7:644–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    King RW, Peters JM, Tugendreich S et al. A 20S complex containing CDC27 and CDC16 catalyzes the mitosis-specific conjugation of ubiquitin to cyclin B. Cell 1995; 81:279–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rape M, Reddy SK, Kirschner MW. The processivity of multiubiquitination by the APC determines the order of substrate degradation. Cell 2006; 124:89–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reddy SK, Rape M, Kirschner MW. Ubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex drives spindle checkpoint inactivation. Nature 2007; 446:921–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stegmeier F, Rape M, Draviam VM et al. Anaphase initiation is regulated by antagonistic ubiquitination and deubiquitination activities. Nature 2007; 446:876–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goshima G, Wollmann R, Goodwin SS et al. Genes required for mitotic spindle assembly in Drosophila S2 cells. Science 2007; 316:417–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Margottin-Goguet F, Hsu JY, Loktev A et al. Prophase destruction of Emi1 by the SCF(betaTrCP/Slimb) ubiquitin ligase activates the anaphase promoting complex to allow progression beyond prometaphase. Dev Cell 2003; 4:813–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yu H, King RW, Peters JM et al. Identification of a novel ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme involved in mitotic cyclin degradation. Curr Biol 1996; 6:455–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rodrigo-Brenni MC, Morgan DO. Sequential E2s drive polyubiquitin chain assembly on APC targets. Cell 2007; 130:127–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Michelle C, Vourc’h P, Mignon L et al. What was the set of ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like conjugating enzymes in the eukaryote common ancestor? J Mol Evol 2009; 68:616–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Máthé E, Kraft C, Giet R et al. The E2-C vihar is required for the correct spatiotemporal proteolysis of cyclin B and itself undergoes cyclical degradation. Curr Biol 2004; 14:1723–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rape M, Kirschner MW. Autonomous regulation of the anaphase-promoting complex couples mitosis to S-phase entry. Nature 2004; 432:588–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Summers MK, Pan B, Mukhyala K et al. The unique N terminus of the UbcH10 E2 enzyme controls the threshold for APC activation and enhances checkpoint regulation of the APC. Mol Cell 2008; 31:544–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wagner KW, Sapinoso LM, El-Rifai W et al. Overexpression, genomic amplification and therapeutic potential of inhibiting the UbcH10 ubiquitin conjugase in human carcinomas of diverse anatomic origin. Oncogene 2004; 23:6621–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Berlingieri MT, Pallante P, Guida M et al. UbcH10 expression may be a useful tool in the prognosis of ovarian carcinomas. Oncogene 2007; 26:2136–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fujita T, Ikeda H, Kawasaki K et al. Clinicopathological relevance of UbcH10 in breast cancer. Cancer Sci. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.01026.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pfleger CM, Kirschner MW. The KEN box: an APC recognition signal distinct from the D box targeted by Cdh1. Genes Dev 2000; 14:655–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kirkpatrick DS, Hathaway NA, Hanna J et al. Quantitative analysis of in vitro ubiquitinated cyclin B1 reveals complex chain topology. Nature Cell Biol 2006; 8:700–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ye Y, Rape M. Building a chain: E2 enzymes at work. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. in press.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wirth KG, Ricci R, Giménez-Abián JF et al. Loss of the anaphase-promoting complex in quiescent cells causes unscheduled hepatocyte proliferation. Genes Dev 2004; 18:88–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Liu Z, Diaz LA, Haas AL et al. cDNA cloning of a novel human ubiquitin carrier protein. An antigenic domain specifically recognized by endemic pemphigus foliaceus autoantibodies is encoded in a secondary reading frame of this human epidermal transcript. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:15829–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tedesco D, Zhang J, Trinh L et al. The ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-E PF is overexpressed in primary breast cancer and modulates sensitivity to topoisomerase II inhibition. Neoplasia 2007; 9:601–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jung CR, Hwang KS, Yoo J et al. E2-E PF UCP targets pVHL for degradation and associates with tumor growth and metastasis. Nature Med 2006; 12:809–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yu H. Cdc20: a WD40 activator for a cell cycle degradation machine. Mol Cell 2007; 27:3–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Visintin R, Prinz S, Amon A. CDC20 and CDH1: a family of substrate-specific activators of APC-dependent proteolysis. Science 1997; 278:460–463.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zheng N, Schulman BA, Song L et al. Structure of the Cul1-Rbx1-Skp1-F boxSkp2 SCF ubiquitin ligase complex. Nature 2002; 416:703–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tang Z, Li B, Bharadwaj R et al. APC2 Cullin protein and APC11 RING protein comprise the minimal ubiquitin ligase module of the anaphase-promoting complex. Mol Biol Cell 2001; 12:3839–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Eddins MJ, Carlile CM, Gomez KM et al. Mms2-Ubc13 covalently bound to ubiquitin reveals the structural basis of linkage-specific polyubiquitin chain formation. Nature Struct Mol Biol 2006; 13:915–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kaelin WG. Von Hippel-Lindau disease. Annu Rev Pathol 2007; 2:145–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Reyes-Turcu FE, Ventii KH, Wilkinson KD. Regulation and cellular roles of ubiquitin-specific deubiquitinating enzymes. Annu Rev Biochem 2009; 78:363–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Komander D, Clague MJ, Urbé S. Breaking the chains: structures and functions of deubiquitinases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10:550–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Song L, Rape M. Reverse the curse—the role of deubiquitination in cell cycle control. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2007; 20:156–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Crosas B, Hanna J, Kirkpatrick DS et al. Ubiquitin chains are remodeled at the proteasome by opposing ubiquitin ligase and deubiquitinating activites. Cell 2006; 127:1401–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Yao T, Song L, Xu W et al. Proteasome recruitment and activation of the Uch37 deubiquitinating enzyme by Adrm1. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:994–1002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Beal R, Deveraux Q, Xia G et al. Surface hydrophobic residues of multiubiquitin chains essential for proteolytic targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93:861–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ortolan TG, Tongaonkar P, Lambertson D et al. The DNA repair protein rad23 is a negative regulator of multi-ubiquitin chain assembly. Nat Cell Biol 2000; 2:601–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Thoma CR, Toso A, Gutbrodt KL et al. VHL loss causes spindle misorientation and chromosome instability. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11:994–1001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Rape
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular and Cell BiologyUniversity of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations