Pore formation by Cry toxins

  • Mario Soberón
  • Liliana Pardo
  • Carlos Muñóz-Garay
  • Jorge Sánchez
  • Isabel Gómez
  • Helena Porta
  • Alejandra Bravo
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 677)


B acillus thuringiensis (Bt) bacteria produce insecticidal Cry and Cyt proteins used in the biological control of different insect pests. In this review, we will focus on the 3d-Cry toxins that represent the biggest group of Cry proteins and also on Cyt toxins. The 3d-Cry toxins are pore-forming toxins that induce cell death by forming ionic pores into the membrane of the midgut epithelial cells in their target insect. The initial steps in the mode of action include ingestion of the protoxin, activation by midgut proteases to produce the toxin fragment and the interaction with the primary cadherin receptor. The interaction of the monomeric Cry1A toxin with the cadherin receptor promotes an extra proteolytic cleavage, where helix α-1 of domain I is eliminated and the toxin oligomerization is induced, forming a structure of 250 kDa. The oligomeric structure binds to a secondary receptor, aminopeptidase N or alkaline phosphatase. The secondary receptor drives the toxin into detergent resistant membrane microdomains forming pores that cause osmotic shock, burst of the midgut cells and insect death. Regarding to Cyt toxins, these proteins have a synergistic effect on the toxicity of some Cry toxins. Cyt proteins are also proteolytic activated in the midgut lumen of their target, they bind to some phospholipids present in the mosquito midgut cells. The proposed mechanism of synergism between Cry and Cyt toxins is that Cyt1Aa function as a receptor for Cry toxins. The Cyt1A inserts into midgut epithelium membrane and exposes protein regions that are recognized by Cry11Aa. It was demonstrated that this interaction facilitates the oligomerization of Cry11Aa and also its pore formation activity.


Bacillus Thuringiensis Pore Formation Brush Border Membrane Oligomeric Structure Midgut Epithelial Cell 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Schnepf E, Crickmore N, Van Rie J et al. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 1998; 62:705–806.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    James C. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops, 2006. ISAAA Briefs 2006; 35:1–9Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Maagd RA, Bravo A, Berry et al. Structure, diversity and evolution of protein toxins from spore-forming entomopathogenic bacteria. Ann Rev Genet 2003; 37:409–433.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li J, Carroll J, Ellar DJ. Crystal structure of insecticidal δ-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis at 25Å resolution. Nature 1991; 353:815–821.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grochulski P, Masson L, Borisova S et al. Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A(a) insecticidal toxin crystal structure and channel formation. J Mol Biol 1995; 254:447–464.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morse RJ, Yamamoto T, Stroud RM. Structure of Cry2Aa suggests an unexpected receptor binding epitope. Structure 2001; 9:409–417.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Galitsky N, Cody V, Wojtczak A et al. Structure of insecticidal bacterial δ-endotoxin Cry3Bb1 of Bacillus thuringiensis. Acta Cryst 2001; D57:1101–1109.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boonserm P, Davis P, Ellar DJ et al. Crystal structure of the mosquito-larvicidal toxin Cry4Ba and its biological implications. J Mol Biol 2005; 348:363–382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boonserm P, Mo M, Angsuthanasombat Ch et al. Structure of the functional form of the mosquito larvicidal Cry4Aa toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis at a 28 Angstrom resolution. J Bacteriol 2006; 188:3391–3401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cooper MA, Carroll J, Travis E et al. Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxin interaction with Manduca sexta aminopeptidase N in a model membrane environment. Biochem J 1998; 333:677–683.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Griffitts JS, Haslam SM, Yang T et al. Glycolipids as receptors for Bacillus thuringiensis crystal toxin. Science 2005; 307:922–925.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li J, Pandelakis AK, Ellar DJ. Structure of the mosquitocidal δ-endotoxin CytB from Bacillus thuringiensis sp kyushuensis and implications for membrane pore formation. J Mol Biol 1996; 257:129–152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cohen S, Dym O, Albeck S et al. High resolution crystal structure of activated Cyt2Ba Monomer from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. J Mol Biol 2008; 380:820–927.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guerchicoff A, Delécluse A, Rubinstein CP. The Bacillus thuringiensis cyt genes for hemolytic endotoxin constitute a gene family. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001; 67:1090–1096.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wu D, Johnson JJ, Federeci BA. Synergism of mosquitocidal toxicity between CytA and CryIVD proteins using inclusions produced from cloned genes of Bacillus thuringiensis. Mol Microbiol 1994; 13:965–972.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wirth MC, Delécuse A, Walton WE. CytAb1 and Cyt2Ba1 from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp medellin and Bacillus thuringiensis subsp israelensis synergize Bacillus sphaericus against Aedes aegypti and resistant Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera Culicidae). Appl Environ Microbiol 2001; 67:3280–3284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Promdonkoy B, Ellar DJ. Membrane pore architecture of a cytolytic toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis. Biochem J 2000; 350:275–282.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lin SC, Lo YC, Lin JY et al. Crystal structure and electron micrographs of fungal volvatoxin A2. J Mol Biol 2004; 343:477–491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Knowles BH, Ellar DJ. Colloid-osmotic lysis is a general feature of the mechanism of action of Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxins with different insect specificity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1987; 924:507–518.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bravo A, Gómez I, Conde J et al. Oligomerization triggers binding of a Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab pore-forming toxin to aminopeptidase N receptor leading to insertion into membrane microdomains. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004; 1667:38–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang X, Candas M, Griko NB et al. A mechanism of cell death involving an adenylyl cyclase/PKA signaling pathway is induced by the Cry1Ab toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:9897–9902.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dow JAT. Insect midgut function. Adv Insect Physiol 1986; 19:187–238.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bradley D, Harkey MA, Kim MK et al. The insecticidal Cry1B crystal protein of Bacillus spp thuringiensis has dual specificity to Coleopteran and Lepidopteran larvae. J Invertebr Pathol 1995; 65:162–173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Choma CT, Surewicz WK, Carey PR et al. Unusual proteolysis of the protoxin and toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis and structural implications. Eur J Biochem 1990; 189:523–527.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Terra W, Ferreira C. Insect digestive enzymes: properties compartamentalization and function. Comp Biochem Physiol 1994; 109B:1–62.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bravo A, Sánchez J, Kouskoura T et al. N-terminal activation is an essential early step in the mechanism of action of the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac insecticidal toxin. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:23985–23987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Oppert B, Kramer KJ, Beeman RW et al. Proteinase-mediated insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:23473–23476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Keller M, Sneh B, Strizhov N et al. Digestion of δ-endotoxin by gut proteases may explain reduced sensitivity of advanced instar larvae of Spodoptera littoralis to CryIC. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 1996; 26:365–373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Miranda R, Zamudio F, Bravo A. Processing of Cry1Ab δ-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis by midgut proteases: role in toxin activation and inactivation. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 2001; 31:1155–1163.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    MacIntosh SC, Kishore GM, Perlak FJ et al. Potentiation of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal activity by serine protease inhibitor. J Agric Food Chem 1990; 38:1145–1152.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Valaitis AP, Jenkins JL, Lee MK et al. Isolation, partial characterization of Gypsy moth BTR-270 an anionic brush border membrane glycoconjugate that binds Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A toxins with high affinity Arch Ins Biochem Physiol 2001; 46:186–200.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Xu X, Yu L, Wu Y. Disruption of a cadherin gene associated with resistance to Cry1Ac delta-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis in Helicoverpa armigera. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005; 71:948–954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Morin S, Biggs RW, Shriver L et al. Three cadherin alleles associated with resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in pink bollworm. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:5004–5009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Flannagan RD, Yu CG, Mathis JP et al. Identification cloning and expression of a Cry1Ab cadherin receptor from European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (Lepidoptera Crambidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol 2005; 35:33–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vadlamudi RK, Weber E, Ji I et al. Cloning and expression of a receptor for an insecticidal toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:5490–5494.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nagamatsu Y, Koike T, Sasaki K et al. The cadherin-like protein is essential to specificity determination and cytotoxic action of the Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal. FEBS Lett 1999; 460:385–390.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gahan LJ, Gould F, Heckel DG. Identification of a gene associated with Bt resistance in Heliothis virescens. Science 2001; 293:857–860.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hua G, Zhang R, Abdullah MA et al. Anopheles gambiae cadherin AgCad1 binds the Cry4Ba toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis and a fragment of AgCad1 synergizes toxicity. Biochemistry 2008; 47:5101–5110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chen J, Brown MR, Hua G et al. Comparison of the localization of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A delta endotoxins and their binding proteins in larval midgut of tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta. Cell Tissue Res 2005; 321:123–129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Knight P, Crickmore N, Ellar DJ. The receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA(c) delta-endotoxin in the brush border membrane of the lepidopteran Manduca sexta is aminopeptidase N. Mol Microbiol 1994; 11:429–436.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Garczynski SF, Adang MJ. Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA(c) σ-endotoxin binding aminopeptidase in the Manduca sexta midgut has a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol anchor. Insec Biochem Molec Biol 1995; 25:409–415.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yaoi K, Kadotani T, Kuwana H et al. Aminopeptidase N from Bombyx mori as a candidate for the receptor of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Aa toxin. Eur J Biochem 1997; 246:652–657.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lee MK, You TH, Young BA et al. Aminopeptidase N purified from gypsy moth brush border membrane vesicles is a specific receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis CryIAc toxin. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996; 62:2845–2849.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Luo K, Tabashnik BE, Adang MJ. Binding of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxin to aminopeptidase in susceptible and resistant Diamondback Moths (Plutella xylostella). Appl Environ Microbiol 1997; 63:1024–1027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Agrawal N, Malhotra P, Bhatnagar RK. Interaction of gene-cloned, insect cell-expressed aminopeptidase N of Spodoptera litura with insecticidal crystal protein Cry1C. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002; 68:4583–4592.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Abdullah MA, Valaitis AP, Dean DH. Identification of a Bacillus thuringiensis Cry11Ba toxin-binding aminopeptidase from the mosquito Anopheles quadramaculatus. BMC Biochem 2006; 7:16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pigott CR, Ellar DJ. Role of receptors in Bacillus thuringiensis crystal toxin activity Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2007; 71:265–281.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jurat-Fuentes JL, Adang MJ. Characterization of a Cry1Ac-receptor alkaline phosphatase in susceptible and resistant Heliothis virescens larvae. Eur J Biochem 2004; 271:3127–3135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    McNail RJ, Adang MJ. Identification of novel Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac binding proteins in Manduca sexta midgut through proteomic analysis. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 2003; 33:999–1010.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Fernandez LE, Aimanova KG, Gill SS et al. A GPI-anchored alkaline phosphatase is a functional midgut receptor of Cry11Aa toxin in Aedes aegypti larvae. Biochem J 2006; 394:77–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gómez I, Oltean DI, Sanchez J et al. Mapping the epitope in Cadherin-like receptors involved in Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A toxin interaction using phage display. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:28906–28912.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gómez I, Miranda-Rios J, Rudiño-Piñera E et al. Hydropathic complementarity determines interaction of epitope 869HITDTNNK876 in Manduca sexta Bt-R1 receptor with loop 2 of domain II of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A toxins. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:30137–30143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gómez I, Dean DH, Bravo A et al. Molecular basis for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin specificity, two structural determinants in the Manduca sexta Bt-R1 receptor interact with loops α-8 and 2 in domain II of Cry1Ab toxin. Biochemistry 2003; 42:10482–10489.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Dorsch JA, Candas M, Griko NB et al. Cry1A toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis bind specifically to a region adjacent to the membrane-proximal extracellular domain of Bt-R1 in Manduca sexta: involvement of a cadherin in the entomopathogenicity of Bacillus thuringiensis. Insect Bioch Mol Biol 2002; 32:1025–1036.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hua G, Jurat-Fuentes JL, Adang MJ. Bt-R1a extracellular cadherin repeat 12 mediates Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab binding and cytotoxicity. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:28051–28056.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Xie R, Zhuang M, Ross LS et al. Single amino acid mutations in the cadherin receptor from Heliothis virescens affect its toxin binding ability to Cry1A toxins. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:8416–8425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Atsumi S, Inoue Y, Ishizaka T et al. Location of the Bombyx mori 175 kDa cadherin like protein-binding site on Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Aa toxin FEBS J 2008; 276:4913–4926.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Tsuda Y, Nakatani F, Hashimoto K et al. Cytotoxic activity of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry proteins on mammalian cells transfected with cadherin-like Cry receptor gene of Bombyx mori (silkworm). Biochem J 2003; 369:697–703.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hua G, Jurat-Fuentes JL, Adang MJ. Fluorescent-based assays establish Manduca sexta Bt-R(1a) cadherin as a receptor for multiple Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A toxins in Drosophila S2 cells. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 2004; 34:193–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zhang X, Candas M, Griko NB et al. Cytotoxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin depends on specific binding of the toxin to the cadherin receptor BT-R1 expressed in insect cells. Cell Death Differ 2005; 12:1407–416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hara H, Atsumi S, Yaoi K et al. A cadherin-like protein functions as a receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Aa and Cry1Ac toxins on midgut epithelial cells of Bombyx mori larvae. FEBS Lett 2003; 538:29–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Soberón M, Pardo-López L, López I et al. Engineering Modified Bt Toxins to Counter Insect Resistance. Science 2007; 318:1640–1642.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Masson L, Lu YJ, Mazza A et al. The Cry1A(c) receptor purified from Manduca sexta displays multiple specificities. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:20309–20315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Jenkins JL, Lee MK, Valaitis AP et al. Bivalent sequential binding model of a Bacillus thuringiensis toxin to gypsy moth aminopeptidase N receptor. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:14423–14431.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Gómez I, Arenas I, Benitez I et al. Specific epitopes of Domains II and III of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin involved in the sequential interaction with cadherin and aminopeptidase-N receptors in Manduca sexta. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:34032–34039.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Atsumi S, Mizuno E, Hara H et al. Localization of the Bombyx mori aminopeptidase N type 1 binding site on Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Aa toxin. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005; 71:3966–3977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Rajagopal R, Sivakumar S, Agrawal N et al. Silencing of midgut aminopeptidase N of Spodoptera litura by double-stranded RNA establishes its role as Bacillus thuringiensis toxin receptor. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:46849–46851.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Gill M, Ellar D. Transgenic Drosophila reveals a functional in vivo receptor for the Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac. Ins Mol Biol 2002; 11:619–625.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Schwartz JL, Lu YJ, Sohnlein P et al. Ion channels formed in planar lipid bilayers by Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in the presence of Manduca sexta midgut receptors. FEBS Lett 1997; 412:270–276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lorence A, Darszon A, Bravo A. The pore formation activity of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxin on Trichoplusia ni membranes depends on the presence of aminopeptidase N. FEBS Lett 1997; 414:303–307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Gómez I, Sánchez J, Miranda R et al. Cadherin-like receptor binding facilitates proteolytic cleavage of helix α-1 in domain I and oligomer prepore formation of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin. FEBS Lett 2002; 513:242–246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Zhuang M, Oltean DI, Gómez I et al. Heliothis virescens and Manduca sexta lipid rafts are involved in Cry1A toxin binding to the midgut epithelium and subsequent pore formation. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:13863–13872.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Simons K, Toomre D. Lipid rafts and signal transduction. Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol 2000; 1:31–39.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Cabiaux V, Wolff Ch, Ruysschaert JM. Interaction with a lipid membrane: a key step in bacterial toxins virulence. Int J Biol Macromol 1997; 21:285–298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Pardo-López L, Gómez I, Rausell C et al. Structural changes of the Cry1Ac oligomeric prepore from Bacillus thuringiensis induced by N-acetylgalactosamine facilitates toxin membrane insertion. Biochemistry 2006; 45:10329–10336.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Pacheco S, Gómez I, Gill SS et al. Enhancement of insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A toxins by fragments of a toxin-binding cadherin correlates with oligomer formation. Peptides 2008; 30:583–588.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Rausell C, Muñoz-Garay C, Miranda-CassoLuengo et al. Tryptophan spectroscopy studies and black lipid bilayer analysis indicate that the oligomeric structure of Cry1Ab toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis is the membrane-insertion intermediate. Biochemistry 2004; 43:166–174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Chen J, Hua G, Jurat-Fuentes JL et al. Synergism of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins by a fragment of a toxin-binding cadherin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:13901–13906.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Muñoz-Garay C, Sánchez J, Darszon A et al. Permeability changes of Manduca sexta midgut brush border membranes induced by oligomeric structures of different Cry toxins. J Membr Biol 2006; 212:61–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Aronson AI, Chaoxianm G, Wu L. Aggregation of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A toxin upon binding to target insect larval midgut vesicles. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999; 65:2503–2507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Tigue NJ, Jacoby J, Ellar DJ. The alpha-helix 4 residue Asn135, is involved in the oligomerization of Cry1Ac1 and Cry1Ab5 Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001; 67:5715–5720.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Herrero S, González-Cabrera J, Ferré J et al. Mutations in the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ca toxin demonstrate the role of domains II and III in specificity towards Spodoptera exigua larvae. Biochem J 2004; 384:507–513.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Ihara H, Himeno M. Study of irreversible binding of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Aa to brush border membrane vesicles from Bombyx mori midgut. J Invertebr Pathol 2008; 98:177–183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Rausell C, García-Robles I, Sánchez J et al. Role of toxin activation on binding and pore formation activity of the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3 toxins in membranes of Leptinotarsa decemlineata [Say]. Biochem Biophys Acta 2004; 1660:99–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Pérez C, Muñoz-Garay C, Portugal LC et al. Bacillus thuringiensis subsp israelensis Cyt1Aa enhances activity of Cry11Aa toxin by facilitating the formation of a prepore oligomeric structure. Cellular Microbiol 2007; 9:2931–2937.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Likitvivatanavong S, Katzenmeier G, Angsuthanasombat Ch. Asn183 in helix α5 is essential for oligomerization and toxicity of the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry4Ba toxin. Arch Biochem Biophys 2006; 445:46–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Puntheeranurak T, Stroh C, Zhu R et al. Structure and distribution of the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry4Ba toxin in lipid membranes. Ultramicroscopy 2005; 105:115–124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Ounjai P, Unger VM, Sigworth FJ et al. Two conformational states of the membrane-associated Bacillus thuringiensis Cry4Ba delta-endotoxin complex revealed by electron crystallography: implications for toxin-pore formation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007; 36:890–895.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Vié V, Van Mau N, Pomarède P et al. Lipid-induced pore formation of the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Aa insecticidal toxin. J Membr Biol 2001; 180:195–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Jiménez-Juárez N, Muñoz-Garay C, Gómez I et al. Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab mutants affecting oligomer formation are non toxic to Manduca sexta larvae. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:21222–21229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Vachon V, Préfontaine G, Coux F et al. Role of helix 3 in pore formation by the Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal toxin Cry1Aa. Biochemistry 2002; 41:6176–6184.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Girard F, Vachon V, Préfontaine G et al. Cysteine scanning mutagenesis of α-4 a putative pore lining helix of the Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal toxin Cry1Aa. Appl Environm Microbiol 2008; 74:2565–2572.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Wu D, Aronson AI. Localized mutagenesis defines regions of the Bacillus thuringiensis σ-endotoxin involved in toxicity and specificity. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:2311–2317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Schwartz JL, Juteau M, Grochulski P et al. Restriction of intramolecular movements within the Cry1Aa toxin molecule of Bacillus thuringiensis through disulfide bond engineering. FEBS Lett 1997; 410:397–402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Gazit E, La Rocca P, Sansom MSP et al. The structure and organization within the membrane of the helices composing the pore-forming domain of Bacillus thuringiensis α-endotoxin are consistent with an umbrella-like structure of the pore. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:12289–12294.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Nair MS, Dean DH. All domains of Cry1A toxins insert into insect brush border membranes. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:26324–26331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Loseva OI, Toktopulo EI, Vasilev VD et al. Structure of Cry3A α-endotoxin within phopholipid membranes. Biochem 2001; 40:14143–14151.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Schwartz JL, Potvin L, Chen XJ et al. Single-site mutations in the conserved alternating-arginine region affect ionic channels formed by CryIAa, a Bacillus thuringiensis toxin. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997; 63:3978–3984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Schwartz JL, Laprade R. Membrane permeabilization by Bacillus thuringiensis toxins: protein insertion and pore formation In: Entomopathogenic bacteria: from laboratory to field application. (ed J F Charles A Delécluse, C Nielsen-LeRoux) Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000:199.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Lorence A, Darszon A, Díaz C et al. Delta-endotoxins induce cation channels in Spodoptera frugiperda brush border membrane in suspension and in planar lipid bilayers. FEBS Letters 1995; 360:353–356.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Peyronnet O, Vachon V, Schwartz JL et al. Ion channels induced in planar lipid bilayers by the Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Aa in the presence of gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) brush border membranes. J Membr Biol 2001; 184:45–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Peyronnet O, Nieman B, Généreux F et al. Estimation of the radius of the pores formed by the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1C σ-endotoxin in planar lipid bilayers. Biochim Biophys Acta 2002; 1567:113–122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Parker MW, Feil SC. Pore-forming protein toxins: from structure to function. Progr Biophys Mol Biol 2005; 88:91–142.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Rausell C, Pardo-López L, Sánchez J et al. Unfolding events in the water-soluble monomeric Cry1Ab toxin during transition to oligomeric prepore and membrane inserted pore channel. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:55168–55175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Wirth MC, Georghiou GP, Federeci BA. CytA enables CryIV endotoxins of Bacillus thuringiensis to overcome high levels of CryIV resistance in the mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94:10536–10540.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Pérez C, Fernandez LE, Sun J et al. Bti Cry11Aa and Cyt1Aa toxins interactions support the synergism-model that Cyt1Aa functions as membrane-bound receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:18303–18308.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Soberón
    • 1
  • Liliana Pardo
    • 1
  • Carlos Muñóz-Garay
    • 1
  • Jorge Sánchez
    • 1
  • Isabel Gómez
    • 1
  • Helena Porta
    • 1
  • Alejandra Bravo
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Biotecnologia UNAM. Departamento de Microbiología Molecular, Instituto de BiotecnologíaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations