Full-System Simulation from Embedded to High-Performance Systems

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes use cases for and benefits of full-system simulation, based on more than a decade of commercial use of the Simics simulator. Simics has been used to simulate a wide range of systems, from simple single-processor embedded boards to multiprocessor servers and heterogeneous telecom clusters, leading to an emphasis on scalability and flexibility. The most important features and implementation techniques for a high-performance full-system simulator will be described and the techniques to achieve high simulation performance will be discussed in detail. As the ability to efficiently model systems is critical for a full-system simulator, tools and best practices for creating such models will be described. It will be shown how full-system simulation plays a significant role in the development of complex electronic systems, from system definition through development to deployment.

References

  1. 1.
    Magnusson, P., Christensson, M., Eskilson, J., Forsgren, D., Hallberg, G., Hogberg, J., Larsson, F., Moestedt, A., Werner, B.: Simics: A full system simulation platform. Computer 35(2), 50–58 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Embedded Multicore, An Introduction. Freescale Semiconductor (2009).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Introspection of a java virtual machine under simulation. Tech. Rep. SMLI TR-2006-159, Sun Labs (2006).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Engblom, J.: System architecture specification and exploration using a full-system simulator. Virtutech Whitepaper (2009).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosenblum, M., Varadarajan, M.: Simos: A fast operating system simulation environment. Technical Report CSL-TR-94-631, Stanford University (1994).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alameldeen, A., Wood, D.: Ipc considered harmful for multiprocessor workloads. Micro, IEEE 26(4), 8–17 (2006). DOI 10.1109/MM.2006.73.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Engblom, J.: Why virtual platforms need cycle-accurate models. SCDSource (2008).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shafi, H., Bohrer, P.J., Phelan, J., Rusu, C.A., Peterson, J.L.: Design and validation of a performance and power simulator for powerpc systems. IBM J Res Dev 47 (2003).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Albertsson, L.: “Holistic debugging – enabling instruction set simulation for software quality assurance.” In: Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS) (2006).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stetter, M., von Buttlar, J., Chan, P.T., Decker, D., Elfering, H., Giquindo, P.M., Hess, T., Koerner, S., Kohler, A., Lindner, H., Petri, K., Zee, M.: IBM eserver z990 improvements in firmware simulation. IBM J Res Dev 48 (2004).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aynsley, J.: OSCI TLM-2.0 Language Reference Manual. Open SystemC Initiative (OSCI) (2009).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Engblom, J., Monton, M., Burton, M.: Checkpoint and restore for systemc models. In: Forum on Specification and Design Languages (FDL) (2009).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kraemer, S., Leupers, R., Petras, D., Philipp, T.: A checkpoint/restore framework for systemc-based virtual platforms. In: International Symposium on System-on-Chip (SoC) (2009).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koerner, S., Kohler, A., Babinsky, J., Pape, H., Eickhoff, F., Kriese, S., Elfering, H.: Ibm system z10 firmware simulation. IBM J Res Dev 53 (2009).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fuchi, K., Tanaka, H., Manago, Y., Yuba, T.: A program simulator by partial interpretation. In: SOSP ’69: Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pp. 97–104 (1969).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cornet, J., Maraninchi, F., Maillet-Contoz, L.: “A method for the efficient development of timed and untimed transaction-level models of systems-on-chip.” In: DATE ’08: Proceedings of the Conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe, pp. 9–14 (2008). DOI http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1403375.1403381.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wind RiverKistaSweden
  2. 2.IntelStockholmSweden
  3. 3.IntelStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations