Advertisement

A Salutogenic Approach to Tackling Health Inequalities

  • Bengt Lindström
  • Monica Eriksson
Chapter

Abstract

The understanding of any societal health discourse is a complex question involving history, macro-politics, socioeconomic development, culture and traditions of both individual nations and continents as a whole. Interdisciplinary research has a history over the past century involving most social sciences and especially educational sciences supported by many scientists, intellectuals and organisations. This chapter reviews the two themes that have evolved from the new theories on health and life management. First, the salutogenic approach which claims health is open ended and dependent on the skills to organise the resources available in society, the social context and self. This capability has been named the sense of coherence. Second, the theme of resilience claiming there are certain patterns of interaction between the individual and his social context that develop hardiness against stress and the ill-health that could follow.

Keywords

African tribes Post-modern (society) Ottawa charter WHO healthy city project Learning Sense of coherence Quality of Life 

References

  1. Allardt, E. (1980). Att, Ha., Att, Älska., Att, Vara: Om välfärd i Norden. Borgholm: Argos.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, F. M., & Whitney, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: The development of and measurement of perceptual indicators. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress and coping. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health. How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Antonovsky, A. (1991). The salutogenic approach to family system health: promise and danger. In: European congress on “Mental Health in European Families”; p.9. http://www.angelfire.com/ok/soc/agolem.html cited May 2009.Google Scholar
  6. Antonovsky, A. (1993a). The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social Science & Medicine, 36(6):725–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Antonovsky, A. (1993b). Some salutogenic words of wisdom to the conferees. In: The Nordic School of Public Health in Gothenburg, Sweden; p.3. http://www.angelfire.com/ok/soc/agoteborg.html cited May 2009.Google Scholar
  8. Antonovsky, A. (1995). The moral and the healthy: Identical, overlapping or orthogonal? Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Relative Science, 32(1):5–13.Google Scholar
  9. Atkinson, T. (1982). The stability and validity of quality of life measures. Social Indicators Research, 10:113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the holocaust. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1993) The field of cultural production. Essays on art and literature. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  12. Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  13. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development – experiments by nature and human design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive. Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Csíkszentmihályi, M., & Csíkszentmihalyi, I. S. (1998). Optimal experience. Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. de Leeuw, E. (2003). Nurturing healthy cities: research responsibility and accountability. In: Takano, T., editor. Healthy cities & urban policy research. London: Spon.Google Scholar
  18. de Maio, T. J. (1984). Social desirability and survey measurement: A review. In: Turner, C. F., Martin, E., editors. Surveying subjective phenomena. New York: Russell Sage, pp. 257–282.Google Scholar
  19. Dencik, L. (1989). Growing up in postmodern age: On the child’s situation in the modern family and on the position of the family in the modern welfare state. Acta Sociologica, 32(2):155–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eriksson, M., & Lindström, B. (2005). Validity of Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Scale – a systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59(6):460–466.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eriksson, M., & Lindström, B. (2006). Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Scale and the relation with health – a systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60:376–381.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flanagan, J. C. (1982). Measurement of quality of life: Current state of the art. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63:56–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fonagy, P., Steele, M., Higgit, A., et al. (1994). The Emanuel Miller Memorial Lecture 1992. The theory and practice of resilience. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(2):231–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  25. Gardner, H. (1991). To open minds. New York: The Perseus Books Group.Google Scholar
  26. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  27. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  28. Ingelhart, R., & Rabier, J. -C. (1985). If you are unhappy this must be Belgium: Well-being around the world. Public Opinion, 8(2):10–15.Google Scholar
  29. Jahoda, M. (1958). Current concepts of positive mental health. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johansson, S. (1970). Om levnadsnivåundersökningen. Stockholm: Allmänna Förlaget.Google Scholar
  31. Kajandi, M. (1981). Allmän översikt över forskningsområdet. Livskvalitet – en litteraturstudie av livskvalitet som beteendevetenskapligt begrepp samt ett förslag till definition. Uppsala: Forskningskliniken.Google Scholar
  32. Klein, J. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory and practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Koelen, M., & Lindström, B. (2005). Making healthy choices easy choices: the role of empowerment. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 59(Suppl 1):S10–S16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lazarus, R., & Lannier R. (1979). Stress-related transactions between persons and environment. In: Pervin, L., Lewis, M., editors. Perspectives in international psychology. New York: Plenum, pp. 142–156.Google Scholar
  35. Lindström, B. (1994). The essence of existence. On the quality of life of children in the Nordic countries – theory and practice in public health (Doctoral thesis). Göteborg: Nordic School of Public Health.Google Scholar
  36. Lindström, B., & Nafstad, A. (2003). On the origin of salutogenesis. In: The 4th Nordic health promotion research conference 10–13 June. Västerås, Sweden; 2003.Google Scholar
  37. Lundberg, O. (1997). Childhood conditions, sense of coherence, social class and adult ill health: Exploring their theoretical and empirical relations. Social Science and Medicine, 44 (6):821–831.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mahler, H. (1987). The role of schools of public health in the development of public health. In: Köhler, L., editor. Public Health – a Nordic Perspective. In Swedish. Gothenburg: Nordic School of Public Health.Google Scholar
  39. Malterud, K., & Hollnagel, H. (1998). Talking with women about personal health resources in general practice. Key questions about salutogenesis. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, (16):66–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Malterud, K., & Hollnagel, H. (1999). Encouraging the strengths of women patients. A case study from general practice on empowering dialogues. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 27:254–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Margalit, M., Rochberg, Y., & Al-Yagon, M. (1995). Home-computing model and children with learning disabilities: A systemic approach. Learning Disability Quarterly, (18):68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mastekaasa, A., Moum, T., Naess, S. (1988). Livskvalitetsforskning. Oslo: ISF Rapport 88:6.Google Scholar
  43. Naess, S. (1974). Psykologiske aspekter ved livskvalitet: om begrepet “indre livskvalitet” som mål for sosialpolitikken og om et forsök på å operasjonalisere begrepet. Oslo: Institutt for anvendt sosialvitenskapelig forskning.Google Scholar
  44. Naess, S. (1979). Livskvalitet: om å ha det godt i byen og på landet. Oslo: Institutt for anvendt sosialvitenskapelig forskning.Google Scholar
  45. Naess, S. (1987). Quality of life research: Concepts, methods and applications. Oslo: Institute of Applied Social Research.Google Scholar
  46. Nilsson, L. (2003). The encounter between health promotion and schools in theory and in practice. In Swedish (Doctoral thesis). Örebro: Örebro University.Google Scholar
  47. Nutbeam, D. (1993). Advocacy and mediation in creating supportive environments for health. Health Promotion International, 8:165–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. OECD. (2009). Society at a Glance 2009 – Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Social Indicators. www.oecd.org/els/social/indicators/SAG cited May 2009.Google Scholar
  49. Raphael, D. (2002). Evaluation of quality of life initiatives in health promotion. In: Evaluation in health promotion. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  50. Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15:121–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Resnick, M. D., Bearman, P. S., Blum, W., et al. (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm. Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. JAMA, 278(10):823–832.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ringen, S. (1988). Approaches to the measurement of welfare. Oslo: Statistisk Sentralbyrå.Google Scholar
  53. Rootman, I., Raphael, D., Shewchuk, D., et al. (1992). Development of an approach and instrument package to measure quality of life of persons with developmental disabilities. Toronto: University of Toronto, Centre for Health Promotion.Google Scholar
  54. Rosenbaum, M. (1990). Learned resourcefulness. On coping skills, self-control, and adaptive behaviour. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  55. Rutter, M. (1980). Changing youth in a changing society. Patterns of adolescent development and disorder. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Rutter, M. (1985). Resilience in the face of adversity. British Journal of Psychiatry, 147:598–611.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shalock, R. L. (1990). Quality of life. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation, Special Publications.Google Scholar
  58. Swedner, H. (1983). Social work – a framework for thought. In Swedish. Stockholm: Liber. 18. Swedner, H. (1983). Socialt arbete – en tankeram. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
  59. Turnbull, C. M. (1961). The forest people. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  60. Turnbull, C. M. (1972). The mountain people. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  61. Veenhofen, R. (1991). Questions on happiness. In: Strack, F., Argyle., M., Schwarz, N., editors. Subjective well-being. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  62. Ventegodt, S. (1995). Livskvalitet i Danmark. Resultater fra en befolkningsundersögelse. Köpenhamn: Forskningscentrets Forlag.Google Scholar
  63. Werner, E., & Smith, R. (1982). Vulnerable but invincible. A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  64. Werner, E., & Smith, R. (2001). Journeys from childhood to midlife. Risk, resilience, and recovery. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Whitehead, M., & Diderichsen, F. (2001). Social capital and health: Tip-toeing through the minefield of evidence. Lancet, 358:165–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. WHO. (1986). The Ottawa charter. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  67. WHO. (1946). Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Folkhälsan Research CentreHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Nordic School of Public HealthGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations