Innovations in Culturally Based Science Education Through Partnerships and Community

  • Megan Bang
  • Douglas Medin
  • Karen Washinawatok
  • Shannon Chapman


A growing body of educational research demonstrates the need to address diverse ways of knowing in teaching and learning environments in order to improve school achievement for groups of students who have historically been placed at risk. Central to this growing body of work has been evolving conceptions and methodologies for studying cultural processes in the learning environments in which children live. To test these ideas we have developed a research partnership among the American Indian Center of Chicago, Northwestern University, and the Menominee tribe of Wisconsin. Our chapter will review the methodological and conceptual issues associated with these ideas and the ways in which it specifically plays out when conducting research with Indigenous communities. We will explore the possibilities that new configurations and approaches to research can expand diversity and simultaneously deepen fundamental knowledge. The chapter will explore the collaboration issues we have struggled with in the design of research studies, implementation of studies, and data collection and analysis. We also analyze methodological challenges and advances our collaboration has posed to cognitive science research. Finally, our chapter will explore the benefits to community and university partners that often are unspoken in the research enterprise.


Science Education Community Member Native People Indigenous Community Design Team 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This research was supported by a grant from the Christian A. Johnson Endeavor Foundation, NSF ROLE grant 0815222, and NSF REESE grant 08015020.


  1. Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science Education for Everyday Life. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ballenger, C., & Rosebery, A. S. (2003). What counts as teacher research? Investigating the scientific and mathematical ideas of children from culturally diverse backgrounds. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  3. Bang, M. (2007). The Cultural Context of Learning: Native American Science Education. Doctoral Dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  4. Bang, M., & Medin, D. (submitted). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education.Google Scholar
  5. Bang, M., Medin, D., & Atran, S. (2007). Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 13868–13874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, D. R. M. (2002). Siege and survival: History of the Menominee Indians, 1634–1856. Omaha, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, P. (in press). On the theoretical breadth of design-based research in education. Educational Psychologist.Google Scholar
  8. Bitgood, S. (1993). Social influences on the visitor museum experience. Visitor Behavior, 8(3), 4–5.Google Scholar
  9. Cajete, G. A. (1997). Native science. Natural laws of interdependence. Santa Fe, NM: Clear Light Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Cajete, G. A. (1999). Igniting the sparkle: An indigenous science education model. Skyand, NC: Kivaki Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cajete, G. A. (2000). Indigenous knowledge: The pueblo metaphor of indigenous education. In M. Battiste (Ed.), Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chandler, M. J., & Lalonde, C. (1998). Cultural continuity as a hedge against suicide in Canada’s first nations. Transcultural Psychiatry, 35, 191–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chinn, P. W. U. (2007). Decolonizing methodologies and indigenous knowledge: The role of culture, place and personal experience in professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1247–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, T. (2000). Sustaining the forest, the people, and the spirit. Albany, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  16. Deloria, V. (1979). The metaphysics of modern existence. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  17. Deloria, V., & Wildcat, D. R. (2001). Power and place. Indian education in America. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  19. Demmert, W., & Towner, J. C. (2003). A review of the research literature on the influences of culturally based education on the academic performance of native American students. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Library.Google Scholar
  20. Duensing, S. (2006). Culture matters: Science centers and cultural contexts. In Z. Bekerman, N. Burbules, & D. Silberman-Keller (Eds.), Learning in places: The informal education reader. New York: Peter Lang Publisher.Google Scholar
  21. Grignon, D. R., Alegria, R., Dodge, C., Lyons, G., Waukechon, C., Warrington, C., et al. (1998). Menominee tribal history guide: Commemorating Wisconsin Sesquicentennial 1848–1998. Keshena, WI: Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  22. Gutiérrez, K. (2006). Culture matters: Rethinking educational equity. New York: Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-Lopez, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, & Activity: An International Journal, 6(4), 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-Lopez, P., & Turner, M. G. (1997). Putting language back into language arts: When the radical middle meets the third space. Language Arts, 74(5), 368–378.Google Scholar
  25. Gutiérrez, K., Larson, J., & Kreuter, B. (1995). Cultural tensions in the scripted classroom: The value of the subjugated perspective. Urban Education, 29(4), 410–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guyette, S. (1983). Community based research: A handbook for native Americans. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
  28. Hall, P., & Pecore, M. (1995). Case study: Menominee tribal enterprises. Madison, WI: Institute for Environmental Studies and the Lane Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin- Madison.Google Scholar
  29. Hermes, M. (1999). Research methods as a situated response: Toward a first nations’ methodology. In L. Parker, D. Deyhle, & S. Villenas (Eds.), Race is...Race isn’t: Critical race theory and qualitative studies in education (pp. 83–100). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2004). Argumentation in Haitian Creole classrooms. Harvard Educational Review, 73(1), 73–93.Google Scholar
  31. Hudson, P., & Taylor-Henley, S. (2001). Beyond the rhetoric: Implementing culturally appropriate research projects in first nations communities. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 25, 93–105.Google Scholar
  32. Kawagley, O. (1995). A Yupiaq worldview. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kawagley, O. (2000). Identity-creating camps. Sharing Our Pathways, 5(2), 4–5.Google Scholar
  34. Lee, C. D. (1993). Signifying as a scaffold for literary interpretation. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  35. Lee, C. D. (1995). A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 608–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee, C. (2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 97–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lipka, J. (1998). Expanding curricular and pedagogical possibilities: Yup’ik-based mathematics, science, and literacy. In J. Lipka , G. V. Mohatt, & the Ciulistet Group (Eds.), Transforming the culture of schools: Yup’ik Eskimo examples. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  38. Lomawaima, K. T. (2000). Tribal sovereigns: Reframing research in American Indian education. Harvard Educational Review, 70, 1.Google Scholar
  39. Maryboy, N. C., Begay, D. H., & Nichol, L. (2006). Paradox and transformation. World Indigenous Nations Higher Education Consortium, 2.Google Scholar
  40. Medin, D., Ross, N., Cox, D., & Atran, S. (2007). Why folkbiology matters: Resource conflict despite shared goals and knowledge. Human Ecology, 35(3), 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mihesuah, D. (1998). Natives and academics: Researching and writing about American Indians. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
  42. Moll, L. C., & González, N. (2004). Engaging life: A funds of knowledge approach to multicultural education. In J. Banks & C. McGee Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 699–715). New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  43. Nasir, N., & Cobb, P. (2005). Diversity, equity, and access to mathematical ideas. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  44. National Science Foundation (2007) Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2007 (NSF Publication No. 07–315) (NSF 41. Division of Science Resources Statistics, Arlington, VA).Google Scholar
  45. Newman, J. G. (1967). Menominee forest of Wisconsin: A case history in American forest management. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
  46. Ochs, E., Gonzales, P., & Jacoby, S. (1996). When I come down I’m in the domain state: Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 328–369). Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Orfield, G., Losen, D., Wald, J., & Swans, C. (2004). Losing our future: How minority youth are being left behind by the graduation rate crisis. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University. Retrieved July 1, 2009 from
  48. Pavel, D. M., Curtin, T. R., & Whitener, S. D. (1998). Characteristics of American Indian and Alaska native education: Results from the 1990–1991 and 1993–1994 schools and staffing survey. Equity and Excellence in Education, 31, 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
  50. Rosebery, A., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2006). Using diversity as a strength in the science classroom: The benefits of science talk. In R. Douglas (Ed.), Linking science & literacy in the K-8 classroom (pp. 305–320). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.Google Scholar
  51. Ross, N., Medin, D. L., Coley, J. D., & Atran, S. (2003). Cultural and experiential differences in the development of folkbiological induction. Cognitive Development, 18, 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schroeder, C. M., Scott, T. P., Tolson, H., Huang, T., & Lee, Y. (2007). A Meta-Analysis of National Research: The Effects of Teaching Strategies on Student Achievement in Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1436–1460.Google Scholar
  53. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonising methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  54. van Eijck, M., & Roth, W. M. (2007). Improving science education for sustainable development. PLoS Biology, 5(12), e306. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. S. (2004). What do you think Keenan means? Exploring possible meanings of explicitness in the science classroom. Speaker Series: Center for the Scholarship of Teaching. College of Education: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  57. Wolpert, L., & Richards, A. (1997). Passionate minds: The inner World of scientists. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2007). Voices of students on engagement: A report on the 2006 high school survey of student engagement. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation and Education Policy.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Megan Bang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Douglas Medin
    • 3
  • Karen Washinawatok
    • 4
  • Shannon Chapman
    • 5
  1. 1.TERCCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.American Indian Center of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  4. 4.Menominee Language and Culture CommissionKeshenaUSA
  5. 5.Menominee Tribal SchoolNeopitUSA

Personalised recommendations