Generation and Selection of Surrogate Methods for Correlation Analysis

Part of the Springer Series in Computational Neuroscience book series (NEUROSCI, volume 7)

Abstract

Generating artificial data from experimental data as a means for implementing a null hypothesis is becoming widely used. The reason is twofold: increasing computer power now allows for this type of approach, and it has become clear that the complexity of experimental data does not in general allow one to formulate a null hypothesis analytically. This is particularly true for the correlation analysis of parallel spike trains. Neglecting statistical features of experimental data can easily lead to the occurrence of false positive results, which of course needs to be avoided. Therefore surrogate data are used to generate the predictor by modifying the original data in such a way that the feature of interest (temporal coordination of spikes) is destroyed but other features of the data are preserved. The latter aspect is the most demanding and requires the selection of a surrogate type that best fits the data at hand. This chapter will demonstrate the need for such a selection and will show selection criteria.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abeles M, Gat I (2001) Detecting precise firing sequences in experimental data. J Neurosci Meth 107(1–2):141–154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger D, Warren D, Normann R, Arieli A, Grün S (2007) Spatially organized spike correlation in cat visual cortex. Neurocomputing 70:2112–2116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butts DA, Weng C, Jin J, Yeh C, Lesica NA, Alonso J, Stanley GB (2007) Temporal precision in the neural code and the timescales of natural vision. Nature 449:92–95 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Date A, Bienenstock E, Geman S (1998) On the temporal resolution of neural activity. Technical report. Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University Google Scholar
  5. Denker M, Roux S, Timme M, Riehle A, Grün S (2007) Phase synchronization between LFP and spiking activity in motor cortex during movement preparation. Neurocomputing 70:2096–2101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gerstein GL (2004) Searching for significance in spatio-temporal firing patterns. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 64(2):203–207 Google Scholar
  7. Gerstein GL, Perkel DH (1972) Mutual temporal relationships among neuronal spike trains. Statistical techniques for display and analysis. Biophysical J 12(5):453–473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grün S (2009) Data-driven significance estimation of precise spike correlation. J Neurophysiol 101:1126–1140 (Review) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Grün S, Diesmann M, Grammont F, Riehle A, Aertsen A (1999) Detecting unitary events without discretization of time. J Neurosci Meth 94(1):67–79 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grün S, Diesmann M, Aertsen A (2002) Unitary events in multiple single-neuron spiking activity. I. Detection and significance. Neural Comput 14(1):43–80 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Grün S, Riehle A, Diesmann M (2003) Effect of cross-trial nonstationarity on joint-spike events. Biol Cybern 88(5):335–351 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Harrison MT, Geman S (2009) A rate and history-preserving resampling algorithm for neural spike trains. Neural Comput 21(5):1244–1258 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison MT, Amarasingham A, Geman S (2007) Jitter methods for investigating spike train dependencies. Computat Systems Neurosci Abstracts 3(17) Google Scholar
  14. Hatsopoulus N, Geman S, Amarasingham A, Bienenstock E (2003) At what time scale does the nervous system operate?. Neurocomputing 52:25–29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ikegaya Y, Aaron G, Cossart R, Aronov D, Lampl I, Ferster D, Yuste R (2004) Synfire chains and cortical songs: temporal modules of cortical activity. Science 304(5670):559–564 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ito H (2007) Bootstrap significance test of synchronous spike events a case study of oscillatory spike trains. Stat Med 26:3976–3996 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones LM, Depireux DI, Simons DJ, Keller A (2004) Robust temporal coding in the trigeminal system. Science 304(5679):1986–1989 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Louis S, Gerstein GL, Grün S, Diesmann M (in press) Surrogate spike train generation through dithering in operational time. Front Comput Neurosci Google Scholar
  19. Maldonado P, Babul C, Singer W, Rodriguez E, Berger D, Grün S (2008) Synchronization of neuronal responses in primary visual cortex of monkeys viewing natural images. J Neurophysiol 100:1523–1532 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Masuda N, Aihara K (2003) Duality of rate coding and temporal coding in multilayered feedforward networks. Neural Comput 15:103–125 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nádasdy Z, Hirase H, Czurkó A, Csicsvari J, Buzsáki G (1999) Replay and time compression of recurring spike sequences in the hippocampus. J Neurosci 19(21):9497–9507 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nawrot M, Aertsen A, Rotter S (1999) Single-trial estimation of neuronal firing rates: from single-neuron spike trains to population activity. J Neurosci Meth 94:81–92 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nawrot M, Boucsein C, Rodriguez-Molina V, Riehle A, Aertsen A, Rotter S (2007) Serial interval statistics of spontaneous activity in cortical neurons in vivo and in vitro. Neurocomputing 70:1717–1722 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nawrot M, Boucsein C, Rodriguez-Molina V, Riehle A, Aertsen A, Rotter S (2008) Measurement of variability dynamics in cortical spike trains. J Neurosci Meth 169:374–390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pazienti A, Grün S (2007) Bounds of the ability to destroy precise coincidences by spike dithering. Advances in brain, vision, and artificial intelligence. Lecture notes in comput sci, vol 4729. Springer, Berlin, pp 428–437 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pazienti A, Maldonado P, Diesmann M, Grün S (2008) Effectiveness of systematic spike dithering depends on the precision of cortical synchronization. Brain Research 1225:39–46 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Perkel DH, Gerstein GL, Moore GP (1967) Neuronal spike trains and stochastic point processes. II. Simultaneous spike trains. Biophys J 7(4):419–440 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pipa G, Grün S, van Vreeswijk C (2010) Impact of spike-train autostructure on probability distribution of joint-spike events. Neural Comput (under revision) Google Scholar
  29. Pipa G, Wheeler DW, Singer W, Nikolić D (2008) NeuroXidence: reliable and efficient analysis of an excess or deficiency of joint-spike events. J Comput Neurosci 25(1):64–88 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Shinomoto S, Kim H, Shimokawa T, Matsuno N, Funahashi S, Shima K, Fujita I, Tamura H, Doi T, Kawano K, Inaba N, Fukushima K, Kurkin S, Kurata K, Taira M, Tsutsui K, Komatsu H, Ogawa T, Koida K, Tanji J, Toyama K (2009) Relating neuronal firing patterns to functional differentiation of cerebral cortex. PLoS Comput Biol 7(5):12591–12603 Google Scholar
  31. Shmiel T, Drori R, Shmiel O, Ben-Shaul Y, Nádasdy Z, Shemesh M, Teicher M, Abeles M (2006) Temporally precise cortical firing patterns are associated with distinct action segments. J Neurophysiol 96(5):2645–2652 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith MA, Kohn A (2008) Spatial and temporal scales of neuronal correlation in primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 28(48):12591–12603 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. van Rijsbergen CJ (1979) Information retrieval. Butterworth, London Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastien Louis
    • 1
  • Christian Borgelt
    • 2
  • Sonja Grün
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Statistical NeuroscienceRIKEN Brain Science InstituteWakoshiJapan
  2. 2.Intelligent Data Analysis and Graphical Models Research UnitEuropean Centre for Soft ComputingMieresSpain

Personalised recommendations