A Behavior Change Perspective on Self-Regulated Learning with Teachable Agents

Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 28)


Producing lasting changes to metacognition, or the more encompassing construct of self-regulated learning (SRL), has strong parallels to producing behavior change. In the former case, the goal is to develop new “habits of mind,” and in the latter, the goal is to develop new “habits of behavior.” The techniques and theories of behavior change can inform the design of instruction intended to support the development and transfer of SRL. For example, we describe a set of studies in which teaching adolescents behavior change techniques improves their motivational control for both diet and homework goals. Behavior change theories often emphasize the stages of behavior change. We abstract from the various theories to present a four-stage model of behavior change. We then use the model to critique our own work on Teachable Agents. Teachable Agents are a software program where students learn by teaching a computerized pupil. We discuss the successes of the Teachable Agents in achieving SRL goals and improving learning for each stage of the model, but we also describe how Teachable Agents has missed possible opportunities to improve SRL outcomes based on the behavior change literature.



This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grants IIS-0904324 & REESE-0723795. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.


  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (2005). The primacy of self-regulation in health promotion. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A., Blanchard, E. B., & Ritter, B. (1969). Relative efficacy of desensitization and modeling approaches for inducing behavioral, affective, and attitudinal changes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(3), 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baum, J. G., Clark, H. B., & Sandler, J. (1991). Preventing relapse in obesity through posttreatment maintenance systems: Comparing the relative efficacy of two levels of therapist support. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 14(3), 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-regulation, ego depletion, and motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 130(40), 701–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biswas, G., Schwartz, D. L., Leelawong, K., Vye, N., & TAG-V. (2005). Learning by teaching: A new agent paradigm for educational software. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19, 363–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61–100.Google Scholar
  10. Buzzard, M., Faucett, C. L., Jeffery, R. W., McBane, L., McGovern, P., Baxter, J. S., et al. (1996). Monitoring dietary change in a low-fat diet intervention study: Advantages of using 24-hour dietary recalls vs food records. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 96(6), 574–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chase, C. C., Chin, D. B., Oppezzo, M. A., & Schwartz, D. L. (2009). Teachable agents and the protégé effect: Increasing the effort towards learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 334–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chin, D. B., Dohamen, I., Oppezzo, M., Cheng, B., Chase, C., & Schwartz, D. L. (2010). Preparation for future learning with Teachable Agents. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 649–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, S. (1988). Psychosocial models and the role of social support in the etiology of physical disease. Health Psychology, 7, 269–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 191–226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Dweck, C. S. (1996). Implicit theories as organizers of goals and behavior. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 69–90). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ferrer, R. A., Amico, K. R., Bryan, A., Fisher, W. A., Cornman, D. H., Kiene, S. M., et al. (2009). Accuracy of the stages of change algorithm: Sexual risk reported in the maintenance stage of change. Prevention Science, 10, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finkel, E. J., Campbell, W. K., Brunell, A. B., Dalton, A. N., Scarbeck, S. J., & Chartrand, T. L. (2006). High-maintenance interaction: Inefficient social coordination impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 456–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foreyt, J. P., & Goodrick, G. K. (1990). Factors common to successful therapy for the obese patient. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 23(3), 292–297.Google Scholar
  19. Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., Dewall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., et al. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gong, J., Stanton, B., Lunn, S., Deveaux, L., Li, X., Marshall, S., et al. (2009). Effects through 24 months of an HIV/AIDS prevention intervention program based on protection motivation theory among preadolescents in the Bahamas. Pediatrics, 123(5), e917–e928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hajek, P., Stead, L. F., West, R., Jarvis, M., & Lancaster T. (2009). Relapse prevention interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (1), Art. No.: CD003999. doi:  10.1002/14651858.CD003999.pub3.
  23. Horn, D. A. (1976). A model for the study of personal choice health behavior. International Journal of Health Education, 19, 89–98.Google Scholar
  24. Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The health belief model: A decade later. Health Education Quarterly, 11(1), 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kinnebrew, J. S., Biswas, G., Sulcer, B., & Taylor, R.S. (2013). Investigating self-regulated learning in teachable agent environments. In R. Azevedo & V. Aleven (Eds.). International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maddux, J. E., & Rogers, R. W. (1983). Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marlatt, G. A., & Gordon, J. R. (1985). Relapse prevention: Maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  28. Martin, L., & Schwartz, D. L. (2009). Prospective adaptation in the use of representational tools. Cognition and Instruction, 27(4), 370–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Milne, S., Orbell, S., & Sheeran, P. (2002). Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation: Protection motivation theory and implementation intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Perri, M. G., Nezu, A. M., McKelvey, W. F., Shermer, R. L., Renjiliarr, D. A., & Viegener, B. J. (2001). Relapse prevention training and problem-solving therapy in the long-term management of obesity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(4), 722–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to the addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47, 1102–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 118, 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rothman, A. J., Baldwin, A. S., Hertel, A. W., & Fuglestad, P. T. (2011). Self-regulation and behavior change: Disentangling behavioral initiation and behavioral maintenance. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 106–122). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rowan-Szai, G., Joe, G. W., Chatham, L. R., & Simpson, D. D. (1994). A simple reinforcement system for methadone clients in a community-based treatment program. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 11(3), 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schwarzer, R. (2008). Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 1–36). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (2000). Using implementation intentions to increase attendance for cervical cancer screening. Health Psychology, 19, 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Twenge, J. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Self-control: A limited yet renewable resource. In Y. Kashima, M. Foddy, & M. Platow (Eds.), Self and identity: Personal, social, and symbolic (pp. 57–70). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  40. Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2003). Can implementation intentions help to overcome ego-depletion? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weinstein, N. D. (2007). Misleading tests of health behavior theories. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wood, W., Tam, L., & Witt, M. G. (2005). Changing circumstances, disrupting habits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 918–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education, Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations