Advertisement

Service Innovation and Customer Co-development

  • Bo EdvardssonEmail author
  • Anders Gustafsson
  • Per Kristensson
  • Lars Witell
Chapter
Part of the Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy book series (SSRI)

Abstract

Customer co-development is a core concept to understand service innovation . Our point of departure is that there is an untapped business potential from customer co-development, i.e. integration of customers, throughout the service innovation process. From a service logic perspective, the customer has an important role both in service production and service innovation. Most of the focus thus far has been on the role of the customer in production. We argue that there should be a relationship between the role of the customer in service production and the potential role of the customer in service innovation. When there is a change in the process of service production it ought to be followed by a change in the service innovation process. Customers can be integrated as interpreters and translators during various phases of the service innovation process. Companies must be able to understand and manage various customer roles as they complement one another; close and in-depth integration of customers throughout the innovation process is important but at the same time also challenging.

Keywords

Innovation Process Service Production Service Innovation Service Logic Operant Resource 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alam, I. (2002). An exploratory investigation of user involvement in new service development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30 (3), 250-261.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. C., Narus, J. A, & Rossu van, W. (2006). Customer Value Propositions in Business Markets. Harvard Business Review, 84 (3), 90-99,Google Scholar
  3. Chesbrough, H. & Spohrer, J. (2006). A Research Manifesto for Services Science, Communications of the ACM, 49 (7), 35-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dabholkar, P. (1990). How to Improve Perceived Service Quality by Improving Customer Participation, Developments in Marketing Science, B.J. Dunlap, (Ed.), Cullowhee, NC: Academy of Marketing Science, 483-87.Google Scholar
  5. Edvardsson, B., Gustafsson, A., Johnson, M. D. & Sandén, B. (2000). New Service Development and Innovation in the New Economy. Studentlitteratur, Lund.Google Scholar
  6. Edvardsson, B, Enquist, B. & Johnston, B. (2005). Co-creating customer value through hyperreality in the pre-purchase service experience. Journal of Service Research, 8 (2) 149-161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edvardsson, B., Gustafsson, A., Kristensson, P., Magnusson, P. & Matthing, J. (Eds.) (2006). Involving Customers in New Service Development. Imperial College Press, London.Google Scholar
  8. Finch, B. J. (1999). Internet discussions as a source for consumer product customer involvement and quality information: an exploratory study. Journal of Operations Management, 17 (5), 535-556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gersuny, C., & Rosengren, W.R. (1973). The Service Society. Schenkman, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  10. Glushko, R. J. (2008). Designing a Service Science Discipline with Discipline, IBM Systems Journal, 47 (1), 15-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grönroos, C. (2000). Service Management and Marketing. New York, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  12. Grönroos, C. (2008). Service logic revisited: who creates value? And who co-creates? European Business Review, 20 (4), 298-314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gustafsson, A. & Johnson, M. D. (2003). Competing through Services, San Francisco. CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Gummesson, E. (2008). Extending the New Dominant Logic: From Customer Centricity to Balanced Centricity. Commentary for Special Issue of The Journal of the Academy of Market-ing Science (JAMS) on the New Dominant Logic, 36 (1), 15-17.Google Scholar
  15. Kristensson, P., Gustafsson, A. & Archer, T. (2004), Harnessing the creative potential among users, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21 (1), 4-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kristensson, P. Matthing, J. & Johansson, N. (2008). Key strategies for successful involvement of customers in the co-creation of new technology-based services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 19 (4), 474-491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kristensson, P. Matthing, J. & Magnusson, P. (2002). Users as a hidden resource for creativity: findings from an experimental study on user involvement. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11 (1), 55-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lengnick-Hall, L. (1996), Customer Contributions to Quality: A Different View of the Customer-Oriented Firm, Academy of Management Review, 21 (3), 791-824.Google Scholar
  19. Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L. & O´Brien, M. O. (2007), Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic, Journal of Retailing, 83 (1) 5-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L. and Wessels, G. (2008), Toward a conceptual foundation for service science: contributions from service-dominant logic. IBM Systems Journal, 47 (1): 5-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meuter, A. L., Ostrom, R. I. & Bitner, M. J. (2000). Self-Service Technologies: Understanding Customer Satisfaction with Technology-Based Service Encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64 (3): 50-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nambisan, S. (2002). Designing virtual customer environments for new product development: toward a theory. Academy of Management Review, 27 (3) 392-413.Google Scholar
  23. Normann, R. & Ramirez, R. (1993). From value chain to value constellation: Designing interactive strategy. Harvard Business Review, 93 (4), 65-77.Google Scholar
  24. Norton, M. I. & Ariely, D. (2007). Less Is More: The Lure of Ambiguity, or Why Familiarity Breeds Contempt. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 92 (1) 97-105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the Fifth-generation Innovation Process. International Marketing Review, 11 (1), 7-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sanden, B., Gustafsson, A. & Witell, L (2006). The Role of the Customer in the Development Process. In Edvardsson, B., Gustafsson, A., Kristenson, P., Magnusson, P. & Matthing, J. (Eds.). Involving Customers in New Service Development. Imperial College Press, London.Google Scholar
  27. Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave, New York: Bantham.Google Scholar
  28. Vargo, S. L. & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68 (1) 1-17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F. (2006), Service-Dominant Logic: What It Is, What It Is Not, What It Might Be. The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions, Lusch, R. F. & Vargo, S. L. (Eds.), Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe, 43-56.Google Scholar
  30. Vargo, S. L. & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (on line version).Google Scholar
  31. Voss, C. A. (1985). The role of users in the development of applications software. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2 (2), 113-121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bo Edvardsson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anders Gustafsson
    • 1
  • Per Kristensson
    • 1
  • Lars Witell
    • 1
  1. 1.CTF-Service Research CenterKarlstad UniversityKarlstadSweden

Personalised recommendations