Gender and Leadership: Negotiating the Labyrinth

  • Ronit Kark
  • Alice H. Eagly
Chapter

Abstract

There is no topic with more profound implications for gender equality than leadership. Gender equality cannot be attained until women and men share leadership equally. With unfettered access of women to leadership, the policies of organizations and governments would balance the concerns of women and men more equitably. Yet, women and men are not equally represented as leaders in any contemporary nation. Therefore, it is essential that people committed to furthering gender equality understand what enhances the access of women and men to leadership and their ability to perform well in leader roles.

Keywords

Social Capital Transformational Leadership Gender Stereotype Leadership Style Stereotype Threat 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4, 139–158.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, N. J. (2008). I am my mother’s daughter: Early developmental influences on leadership. European Journal of International Management, 2, 6–21.Google Scholar
  3. Agars, M. D. (2004). Reconsidering the impact of gender stereotypes on the advancement of women in organizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 103–111.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E., & Lima, L. (2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for proteges: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 127–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Armstrong-Stassen, M. (2005). Coping with downsizing: A comparison of executive-level and middle managers. International Journal of Stress Management, 12, 117–141.Google Scholar
  6. Atwater, L. E., Brett, J. F., Waldman, D., DiMare, L., & Hayden, M. V. (2004). Men’s and women’s perceptions of the gender typing of management subroles. Sex Roles, 50, 191–199.Google Scholar
  7. Avolio, B. J. (1999). Full leadership development: Building the vital forces in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Ayman, R., & Korabik, K. (in press). Leadership: Why gender and culture matter. American Psychologist.Google Scholar
  9. Bailyn, L. (2002). Time in organizations: Constraints on, and possibilities for, gender equity in the workplace. In R. J. Burke & D. L. Nelson (Eds.), Advancing women’s careers: Research and practice (pp. 262–272). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136–141.Google Scholar
  11. Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill`s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Bell, E. J. E., & Nkomo, S. M. (2001). Our separate ways: Black and White woman and the struggle for professional identity. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Biernat, M. (2005). Standards and expectancies: Contrast and assimilation in judgments of self and others. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  16. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2006). The gender pay gap: Going, going …but not gone. In F. D. Blau, M. C. Brinton, & D. B. Grusky (Eds.), The declining significance of gender? (pp. 37–66). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? Academy of Management Review, 24, 82–98.Google Scholar
  18. Bowleg, L. (2008). When Black + lesbian + woman # Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59, 312–325Google Scholar
  19. Bowen, C., Swim, J. K., & Jacobs. R. R. (2000). Evaluating gender biases on actual job performance of real people: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 2194–2215.Google Scholar
  20. Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., Shiffman, S., Lerner, N., & Salovey, P. (2006). Relating emotional abilities to social functioning: A comparison of self-report and performance measures of emotional intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 780–795.Google Scholar
  21. Brass, D. J. (2001). Social capital and organizational leadership. In S. J. Zaccaro & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), The nature of organizational leadership: Understanding the performance imperatives confronting today’s leaders (pp. 132–152). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Brett, J. M., & Stroh, L. K. (2003). Working 61 hours a week: Why do managers do it? Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 67–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Calás, M. B., & Smircich, L. (1992). Re-writing gender into organization theorizing: Directions from feminist perspectives. In M. Reed & M. Hughes (Eds.), Rethinking organization: New directions in organization theory and analysis (pp. 227–253). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Carli, L. L. (1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 81–99.Google Scholar
  25. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38, 33–53.Google Scholar
  26. Catalyst. (2000). Across three cultures Catalyst finds top barriers to women’s professional advancement. Retrieved September 20, 2008, from https://http://www.catalyst.org/press-release/29/across-three-cultures-catalyst-finds-top-barriers-to-womens-professional-advancement
  27. Catalyst. (2004). Women and men in U.S. corporate leadership: Same workplace, different realities? Retrieved March 12, 2007, from http://www.catalyst.org/file/74/women%20and%20men%20in%20u.s.%20corporate%20leadership%20same%20workplace,%20different%20realities.pdf
  28. Catalyst. (2006). Connections that count: The informal networks of women of color in the United States. Retrieved September 20, 2008, from http://www.catalyst.org/file/25/women%20of%20color%20-%20connections%20that%20count.pdf
  29. Catalyst. (2008). Catalyst 2008 census of the Fortune 500 reveals women gained little ground advancing to business leadership positions. Retrieved December 14, 2008, from http://www.catalyst.org/press-release/141/catalyst-2008-census-of-the-fortune-500-reveals-women-gained-little-ground-advancing-to-business-leadership-positions
  30. Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 413–423.Google Scholar
  31. Cheung, F. M., & Halpern, D. F. (in press). Women at the top: Powerful leaders define success as work + family. American Psychologist.Google Scholar
  32. Cianni, M., & Romberger, B. (1991). Belonging in the corporation: Oral histories of male and female White, Black, and Hispanic managers. Academy of Management Proceedings, 358–362.Google Scholar
  33. Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297–1338.Google Scholar
  34. Costa, P., Terracciano, A., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 701–718.Google Scholar
  36. Dahlerup, D. (2006). Women, quotas, and politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Darley, J. M., & Gross, P. H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 20–33.Google Scholar
  38. Davidson, M. J., & Fielden, S. (1999). Stress and the working women. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 413–426). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276–287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Davison, H. K., & Burke, M. J. (2000). Sex discrimination in simulated employment contexts: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 225–248.Google Scholar
  41. Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004.Google Scholar
  42. De Pater, I. E., van Vianen, A. E. M., Fischer, A. H., & van Ginkel, W. P. (2009). Challenging experiences: Gender differences in task choice. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 4–28.Google Scholar
  43. Desvaux, G., Devillard-Hoellinger, S., & Baumgarten, P. (2008). Women matter: Gender diversity, a corporate performance driver. Paris: McKinsey.Google Scholar
  44. Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188.Google Scholar
  45. Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2004). Aversive racism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 1–52). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  46. Duehr, E. E., & Bono, J. E. (2006). Men, women, and managers: Are stereotypes finally changing?Personnel Psychology, 59, 815–846.Google Scholar
  47. Eagly, A. H. (2005). Achieving relational authenticity in leadership: Does gender matter? Leadership Quarterly, 16, 459–474.Google Scholar
  48. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  49. Eagly, A. H., & Chin, J. L. (in press). Diversity and leadership in a changing world. American Psychologist. Google Scholar
  50. Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569–591.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256.Google Scholar
  52. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685–710.Google Scholar
  53. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125–145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3–22.Google Scholar
  56. Ely, R., & Meyerson, D. (2008). Unmasking manly men. Harvard Business Review, 86, 20.Google Scholar
  57. Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance, 11, 102–111.Google Scholar
  58. European Commission. (2007, December 17). Decision-making in the top 50 publicly quoted companies. Retrieved July 7, 2008, from http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/women_men_stats/out/measures_out438_en.htm
  59. Fassinger, R., Shullman, S., & Stevenson, M. (in press). Toward an affirmative lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender leadership paradigm. American Psychologist.Google Scholar
  60. Featherstone, L. (2004). Selling women short: The landmark battle for workers’ rights at Wal-Mart. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  61. Fletcher, J. K. (1999). Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practice at work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  62. Fletcher, J. K. (2004). The paradox of postheroic leadership: An essay on gender, power, and transformational change. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 647–661.Google Scholar
  63. Foels, R., Driskell, J. E., Mullen, B., & Salas, E. (2000). The effects of democratic leadership on group member satisfaction: An integration. Small Group Research, 31, 676–701.Google Scholar
  64. Forret, M. L., & Dougherty, T. W. (2004). Networking behaviors and career outcomes: Differences for men and women? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 419–437.Google Scholar
  65. Foti, R. J., Knee, R. E., Jr., & Backert, R. S. G. (2008). Multi-level implications of framing leadership perceptions as a dynamic process. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 178–194.Google Scholar
  66. Frenkel, M. (2008). Reprogramming femininity? The construction of gender identities in the Israeli hi-tech industry between global and local gender orders. Gender, Work, and Organizations, 15, 352–374.Google Scholar
  67. Friskopp, A., & Silverstein, S. (1996). Straight jobs, gay lives: Gay and lesbian professionals, the Harvard Business School, and the American workplace. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  68. Gastil, J. (1994). A meta-analytic review of the productivity and satisfaction of democratic and autocratic leadership. Small Group Research, 25, 384–410.Google Scholar
  69. Geis, F. L. (1993). Self-fulfilling prophecies: A social psychological view of gender. In A. E. Beall & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 9–54). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  70. Haslam, S. A., & Ryan, M. K. (2008). The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 530–546.Google Scholar
  71. Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674.Google Scholar
  72. Heilman, M. E., & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Gender stereotypes are alive, well, and busy producing workplace discrimination. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 393–398.Google Scholar
  73. Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2008). Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 189–198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416–427.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Helgesen, S. (1990). The female advantage: Woman’s ways of leadership. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  76. Herzog, H. (1999). Gendering politics: Women in Israel. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  77. Hexter, R. J. (2007, May–June). On being out as a college president. Gay & Lesbian Review Worldwide, pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
  78. Hewlett, S. A. (2002). Creating a life: Professional women and the quest for children. New York: Talk Miramax Books.Google Scholar
  79. Hewlett, S. A., & Luce, C. B. (2005). Off-ramps and on-ramps: Keeping talented women on the road to success. Harvard Business Review, 83, 43–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  81. Hong, L., & Page, S. E. (2004). Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 16385–16389.Google Scholar
  82. hooks, b. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Boston, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
  83. Hoyt, C. L., & Blascovich, J. (2007). Leadership efficacy and women leaders’ responses to stereotype activation. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 595–616.Google Scholar
  84. Hoyt, C. L., & Blascovich, J. (2009). The role of self-efficacy and stereotype activation on cardiovascular, behavioral, and self-report responses in the leadership domain. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 233–249.Google Scholar
  85. Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422–447.Google Scholar
  86. Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 673–703.Google Scholar
  87. Infoplease. (2008). Minorities and women in the 110th Congress. Retrieved March 17, 2008, from http://www.infoplease.com/us/government/women-minorities-110th-congress.html
  88. Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2008). Women in national parliaments (situation as of July 31, 2008). Retrieved on September 1, 2008, from http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/world.htm
  89. Ito, T. A., & Urland, G. R. (2003). Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 616–626.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Jacobs, J. A., & Gerson, K. (2004). The time divide: Work, family, and gender inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Johnson, S. K., Murphy, S. E., Zewdie, S., & Reichard, R. J. (2008). The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106, 39–60.Google Scholar
  92. Judge, E. (2003, November 11). Women on board: Help or hindrance? Times, p. 21.Google Scholar
  93. Judge, T. A., & Piccolo. R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 901–910.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Kark, R. (2004). The transformational leader: Who is (s)he? A feminist perspective. Journal of Organization Change Management, 17, 160–176.Google Scholar
  95. Kark, R. (2007). Women in the land of milk, honey, and high technology: The Israeli case. In R. Burke & M. Mattis (Eds.), Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Opening the pipeline (pp. 101–127). Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.Google Scholar
  96. Kark, R., & Waismel-Manor, R. (2005). Organizational citizenship behavior: What’s gender got to do with it? Organization, 12, 889–917.Google Scholar
  97. Kawahara, D. M., Esnil, E. M., & Hsu, J. (2007). Asian American women leaders: The intersection of race, gender, and leadership. In J. L. Chin, B. Lott, J. K. Rice, & J. Sanchez-Hucles (Eds.), Women and leadership: Transforming visions and diverse voices (pp. 297–313). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  98. Keshet, S., Kark, R., Pomerantz-Zorin, L., Koslowsky, M., & Schwarzwald, J. (2006). Gender, status, and the use of power strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 105–117.Google Scholar
  99. Kite, M. E., & Deaux, K. (1987). Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 83–96.Google Scholar
  100. Kite, M. E., Deaux, K., & Haines, E. L. (2008). Gender stereotypes. In F. L. Denmark & M. A. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (2nd ed., pp. 205–236). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  101. Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 336–353.Google Scholar
  102. Krishnan, H. A., & Park, D. (2005). A few good women—On top management teams. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1712–1720.Google Scholar
  103. Lane, K. A., Banaji, M. R., Nosek, B. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2007). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test IV: What we know (so far) about the method. In B. Wittenbrink & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 59–102). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  104. Leung, A. K., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63, 169–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Livingston, R. W., & Pearce, N. A. (2009). The teddy bear effect: Facial cues of warmth benefit Black CEOs. Psychological Science, 20, 1229–1236.Google Scholar
  106. Lyness, K. S., & Heilman, M. E. (2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 777–785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Lyness, K. S., & Thompson, D. E. (2000). Climbing the corporate ladder: Do female and male executives follow the same route? Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 86–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Madon, S., Guyll, M., Aboufadel, K., Montiel, E., Smith, A., Palumbo, P., et al. (2001). Ethnic and national stereotypes: The Princeton trilogy revisited and revised. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 996–1010.Google Scholar
  109. Mandel, H., & Semyonov, M. (2005). Family policies, wage structures, and gender gaps: Sources of earnings inequality in 20 countries. American Sociological Review, 70, 949–968.Google Scholar
  110. Manuel, T., Shefte, S., & Swiss, D. J. (1999). Suiting themselves: Women’s leadership styles in today’s workplace. Cambridge, MA: Radcliffe Public Policy Institute and the Boston Club.Google Scholar
  111. Martell, R. F., Parker, C., Emrich, C. G., & Crawford, M. S. (1998). Sex stereotyping in the executive suite: “Much ado about something.” Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 127–138.Google Scholar
  112. Martin, J. (1990). Deconstructing organizational taboos: The suppression of gender conflict in organizations. Organization Science, 1, 339–359.Google Scholar
  113. Martin, P. Y. (1996). Gendering and evaluating dynamics: Men, masculinities, and managements. In D. L. Collinson & J. Hearn (Eds.), Men as managers, managers as men (pp. 186–209). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  114. Maume, D. J., Jr. (1999). Occupational segregation and the career mobility of White men and women. Social Forces, 77, 1433–1459.Google Scholar
  115. McCauley, C. D., Ruderman, M. N., Ohlott, P. J., & Morrow, J. E. (1994). Assessing the developmental components of managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 544–560.Google Scholar
  116. McElroy, J. C., Morrow, P. C., & Rude, S. N. (2001). Turnover and organizational performance: A comparative analysis of the effects of voluntary, involuntary, and reduction-in-force turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1294–1299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Meyerson, D. E. (2001). Tempered radicals: How people use difference to inspire change at work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  118. Miller, S. L., Forest, K. B., & Jurik, N. C. (2003). Diversity in blue: Lesbian and gay police officers in a masculine occupation. Men and Masculinities, 5, 355–385.Google Scholar
  119. Mohanty, C. T. (1991). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In C. T. Mohanty, A. Russo, & L. Torres (Eds.), Third world women and the politics of feminism (pp. 51–80). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  120. Molinsky, A. (2007). Cross-cultural code switching: The psychological challenges of adapting behavior in foreign cultural interactions. Academy of Management Review, 32, 622–640.Google Scholar
  121. Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1543–1567.Google Scholar
  122. Musteen, M., Barker, V. L., III, & Baeten, V. L. (2006). CEO attributes associated with attitude toward change: The direct and moderating effects of CEO tenure. Journal of Business Research, 59, 604–612.Google Scholar
  123. Newport, F. (1998, July). Americans more likely to believe sexual orientation due to environment, not genetics. Gallup Poll Monthly. Retrieved September 5, 2008, from Gallup Brain, http: http://www.brain.gallup.com
  124. Newport, F. (2001, February 21). Americans see women as emotional and affectionate, men as more aggressive: Gender specific stereotypes persist in recent Gallup poll. Retrieved September 13, 2009, from Gallup Brain, http://brain.gallup.com
  125. Niemann, Y. F., Jennings, L., Rozelle, R. M., Baxter, J. C., & Sullivan, E. (1994). Use of free responses and cluster analysis to determine stereotypes of eight groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 379–390.Google Scholar
  126. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  127. Page, S. E. (2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  128. Paolillo, J. G. P. (1981). Managers’ self assessments of managerial roles: The influence of hierarchical level. Journal of Management, 7, 43–52.Google Scholar
  129. Parker, P. S. (2005). Race, gender, and leadership: Re-envisioning organizational leadership from the perspectives of African American women executives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  130. Parker, P. S., & Ogilvie, D. T. (1996). Gender, culture, and leadership: Toward a culturally distinct model of African-American women executives’ leadership strategies. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 189–214.Google Scholar
  131. Polzer, J. T., Milton, L. P., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2002). Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 296–324.Google Scholar
  132. Portegijs, W., Hermans, B., & Lalta, V. (2006). Emancipatiemonitor 2006. The Hague: Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
  133. Powell, G. N., Butterfield, D. A., & Parent, J. D. (2002). Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed? Journal of Management, 28, 177–193.Google Scholar
  134. Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (2006). Essentializing differences between women and men. Psychological Science, 17, 129–135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Ragins, B. R., & Cornwell, J. M. (2001). Pink triangles: Antecedents and consequences of perceived workplace discrimination against gay and lesbian employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1244–1261.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Ragins, B. R., Cornwell, J. M., & Miller, J. S. (2003). Heterosexism in the workplace: Do race and gender matter? Group & Organization Management, 28, 45–74.Google Scholar
  137. Rapoport, R., Bailyn, L., Fletcher, J. K., & Pruitt, B. H. (2002). Beyond work-family balance: Advancing gender equity and workplace performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  138. Remennick, L. (2008). Contested motherhood in the ethnic state: Voices from an Israeli postpartum ward. Ethnicities, 8, 199–226.Google Scholar
  139. Riach, P. A., & Rich, J. (2002). Field experiments of discrimination in the market place. Economic Journal, 112, F480–F518.Google Scholar
  140. Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. (2009). Managing diversity in work groups: How identity processes affect diverse work groups. In M. Barreto, M. K. Ryan, & M. T. Schmitt (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender inequality (pp. 281–303). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  141. Ritter, B. A., & Yoder, J. D. (2004). Gender differences in leader emergence persist even for dominant women: An updated confirmation of role congruity theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 187–193.Google Scholar
  142. Rosener, J. B. (1995). America’s competitive secret: Women managers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  143. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762.Google Scholar
  144. Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2008). The face of success: Inferences from chief executive officers’ appearance predict company profits. Psychological Science, 19, 109–111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16, 81–90.Google Scholar
  146. Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review, 32, 549–572.Google Scholar
  147. Sanchez-Hucles, J., & Davis, D. D. (in press). Diverse voices in leadership: The role of gender, race, and identity. American Psychologist.Google Scholar
  148. Sayer, L. C., Cohen, P. N., & Casper, L. M. (2004). The American people: Women, men, and work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  149. Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 95–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675–688.Google Scholar
  151. Scott, K. A., & Brown, D. J. (2006). Female first, leader second? Gender bias in the encoding of leadership behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 230–242.Google Scholar
  152. Sczesny, S., Bosak, J., Neff, D., & Schyns, B. (2004). Gender stereotypes and the attribution of leadership traits: A cross-cultural comparison. Sex Roles, 51, 631–645.Google Scholar
  153. Sczesny, S., & Kühnen, U. (2004). Meta-cognition about biological sex and gender-stereotypic physical appearance: Consequences for the assessment of leadership competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 13–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 219–237.Google Scholar
  155. Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301–311.Google Scholar
  156. Shilts, R. (1980, January). Gay police. Police Magazine, pp. 32–33.Google Scholar
  157. Shrader, C. B., Blackburn, V. B., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9, 355–372.Google Scholar
  158. Silvestri, M. (2003). Women in charge: Policing, gender, and leadership. Portland, OR: Willan.Google Scholar
  159. Smith, R. A. (2002). Race, gender, and authority in the workplace: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 509–542.Google Scholar
  160. Snyder, K. (2006). The G quotient: Why gay executives are excelling as leaders … and what every manager needs to know. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  161. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 379–440). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  162. Stockdale, M. S., & Bhattacharya, G. (2009). Sexual harassment and the glass ceiling. In M. Barreto, M. K. Ryan, & M. T. Schmitt (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender inequality (pp. 171–199). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  163. Timberlake, S. (2005). Social capital and gender in the workplace. Journal of Management Development, 24, 34–44.Google Scholar
  164. Thomas, D. A. (1990). The impact of race on managers’ experiences of developmental relationships (mentoring and sponsorship): An intra-organizational study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 479–492.Google Scholar
  165. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2008). Household data, annual averages: Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Retrieved March 17, 2008, from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.pdf
  166. U.S. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2007). Digest of education statistics, 2007. Retrieved September 20, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d07/ch_1.asp
  167. United Nations Development Programme. (2008). Human development report 2007–2008. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  168. van Engen, M. L., & Willemsen, T. M. (2004). Sex and leadership styles: A meta-analysis of research published in the 1990s. Psychological Reports, 94, 3–18.Google Scholar
  169. van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  170. van Vianen, A. E. M., & Fischer, A. H. (2002). Illuminating the glass ceiling: The role of organizational culture preferences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 315–337.Google Scholar
  171. Vecchio, R. P. (2002). Leadership and gender advantage. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 643–671.Google Scholar
  172. Vinnicombe, S., & Singh, V. (2003). Women-only management training: An essential part of women’s leadership development. Journal of Change Management, 3, 294–306.Google Scholar
  173. von Hippel, W., Sekaquaptewa, D., & Vargas, P. (1995). On the role of encoding processes in stereotype maintenance. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 27, pp. 177–254). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  174. Wajcman, J. (1998). Managing like a man: Women and men in corporate management. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  175. Williams, J. (2000). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  176. Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2009). Gender identity. In M. Leary & R. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior. (pp. 109–125). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  177. Zebrowitz, L. A., & Montepare, J. M. (2005). Appearance does matter. Science, 308, 1565–1566.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronit Kark
    • 1
  • Alice H. Eagly
    • 2
  1. 1.Bar-Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael
  2. 2.Northwestern UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations