Automatic Detection of Motion Artifacts in Infant Functional Optical Topography Studies

  • Anna Blasi
  • Derrick Phillips
  • Sarah Lloyd-Fox
  • Peck Hui Koh
  • Clare E. Elwell
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 662)

Abstract

A key advantage of optical topography (OT) for cognitive neurodevelopmental studies over other imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance (MRI) or positron emission tomography (PET) is that it is less intrusive in the experimental set up. This is, in part, because in OT there is no need to impose strict movement constraints on the participants. However, large head movements can cause signal disruption, thus there is a need to (i) detect artifacts caused by movement and (ii) implement strategies to remove the noise component from the optical data. We have developed a motion sensor compatible with our in-house OT system and suitable for infant studies. With the data collected we have adjusted the thresholds that were used in the past to automatically discard data affected by movement artifacts. We have also compared the performance of two different head probe designs by measuring the amount of signal disruption present in recordings with each design. Finally, we have studied the feasibility of using the sensor data as external input of an adaptive filter to reduce the movement component of the optical data.

References

  1. 1.
    Hoshi Y (2007) Functional near-infrared spectroscopy: current status and future prospects. J Biomed Opt doi: 10.1117/1.2804911Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Matthews F, Pearlmutter BA, Ward TE, Soraghan C, Markham C (2008) Hemodynamics for Brain-Computer Interfaces (Optical correlates of control signals). IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. doi: 10.1109/MSP.2007.909011Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pena M, Maki A, Kovacic D, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Koizumi H, Bouquet F, Mehler J (2003) Sounds and silence: an optical topography study of language recognition at birth. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:11702–11075PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blasi A, Fox S, Everdell N, Volein A, Tucker L, Csibra G, Gibson AP, Hebden JC, Johnson MH, Elwell CE (2007) Investigation of depth dependent changes in cerebral haemodynamics during face perception in infants. Phys Med Biol 52:6849–6864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Everdell NL, Gibson AP, Tullis IDC, Vaithianathan T, Hebden JC, Delpy DT (2005) A frequency multiplexed near-infrared topography system for imaging functional activation in the brain. Rev Sci Instrum doi: 10.1063/1.2038567Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Izzetoglu M, Izzetoglu K, Bunce S, Onaral B (2003) Motion Artifact Removal in fNIR Signals Using Adaptive Filtering. Proc. of IEEE BMES 2003Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lloyd-Fox S, Blasi A, Volein A, Everdell N, Elwell CE, Johnson MH (2009) Social perception in infancy: a near infrared spectroscopy study. Accepted in Child Development. Child Dev 80:986–999Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grossman T, Johnson MH, Lloyd-Fox S, Blasi A, Deligianni F, Elwell C, Csibra G (2008) Early cortical specialization for face-to-face communication in human infants. Proc R Soc B doi:10.1098Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haykin S (1996) Recursive Least-Squares Algorithm. In: Kailath T (ed.) Adaptive Filter Theory, 3rd edn. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Izzetoglu M, Devaraj A, Bunce S, Onaral B (2005) Motion artifact cancellation in NIR spectroscopy using Wiener Filtering, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52:934–938PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Blasi
    • 1
  • Derrick Phillips
    • 1
  • Sarah Lloyd-Fox
    • 2
  • Peck Hui Koh
    • 1
  • Clare E. Elwell
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomedical Optics Research Laboratory, Department of Medical Physics and BioengineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Centre for Brain and Cognitive DevelopmentUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations