Phosphene Mapping Techniques for Visual Prostheses

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Mapping of the visual world onto the visual system occurs in a highly ordered manner, yet with substantial interindividual variability. Since the retinal map of the scene at the photoreceptor level is fully determined by the optical projection of the eye, it is likely that a proximal map generated by a retinal prosthesis closely adheres to the same geometric projection. Once the nerve signals enter the optic nerve, this orderly map is redistributed, and while maps at more proximal levels still follow general rules, special mapping techniques in individual LGN or cortical prosthesis recipients will be required to allow reconstruction of spatial ­relationships in the outside world by means of a disorderly array of phosphenes.

This chapter provides an overview of mapping techniques that have been used in a number of laboratories; discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each; and suggest ways in which various techniques can be combined.

Keywords

Visual Field Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Touch Screen Lower Visual Field Sighted Subject 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Abbreviations

HMD

Head mounted display

MDS

Multidimensional scaling

TMS

Transcranial magnetic stimulation

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgment

Supported in part by PHS grant # EY012843.

References

  1. 1.
    Bak M, Girvin JP, Hambrecht FT, et al. (1990), Visual sensations produced by intracortical microstimulation of the human occipital cortex. Med Biol Eng Comput, 28(3): p. 257–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brelen ME, Duret F, Gerard B, et al. (2005), Creating a meaningful visual perception in blind volunteers by optic nerve stimulation. J Neural Eng, 2(1): p. S22–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brindley G, Lewin W (1968), The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond), 196: p. 479–93.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chai XY, Zhang LL, Shao F, et al. (2007), Tactile based phosphene positioning system for visual prosthesis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 48: p. ARVO E-Abstr. 662.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cowey A, Walsh V (2000), Magnetically induced phosphenes in sighted, blind and blindsighted observers. Neuroreport, 11(14): p. 3269–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dagnelie G, Vogelstein JV (1999), Phosphene mapping procedures for prosthetic vision. In Vision Science and its Applications, Optical Society of America, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dagnelie G, Yin VT, Hess D, Yang L (2003), Phosphene mapping strategies for cortical visual prosthesis recipients. J Vis, 3(12): p. 222.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Delbeke J, Oozeer M, Veraart C (2003), Position, size and luminosity of phosphenes generated by direct optic nerve stimulation. Vision Res, 43(9): p. 1091–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dobelle WH (2000), Artificial vision for the blind by connecting a television camera to the visual cortex. ASAIO J, 46(1): p. 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dobelle WH, Mladejovsky MG (1974), Phosphenes produced by electrical stimulation of human occipital cortex, and their application to the development of a prosthesis for the blind. J Physiol, 243(2): p. 553–76.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dobelle WH, Turkel J, Henderson DC, Evans JR (1979), Mapping the representation of the visual field by electrical stimulation of human visual cortex. Am J Ophthalmol, 88(4): p. 727–35.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Drasdo N, Fowler CW (1974), Non-linear projection of the retinal image in a wide-angle schematic eye. Br J Ophthalmol, 58: p. 709–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Everitt BS, Rushton DN (1978), A method for plotting the optimum positions of an array of cortical electrical phosphenes. Biometrics, 34(3): p. 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fernandez E, Alfaro A, Tormos JM, et al. (2002), Mapping of the human visual cortex using image-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Res Brain Res Protoc, 10(2): p. 115–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gargini C, Terzibasi E, Mazzoni F, Strettoi E (2007), Retinal organization in the retinal degeneration 10 (rd10) mutant mouse: a morphological and ERG study. J Comp Neurol, 500(2): p. 222–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gothe J, Brandt SA, Irlbacher K, et al. (2002), Changes in visual cortex excitability in blind subjects as demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain, 125(Pt 3): p. 479–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holmes G (1918), Disturbances of vision by cerebral lesions. Br J Ophthalmol, 2(7): p. 353–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Humayun MS, de Juan E, Jr., Dagnelie G, et al. (1996), Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans. Arch Ophthalmol, 114(1): p. 40–6.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Humayun MS, de Juan E, Jr., Weiland JD, et al. (1999), Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina. Vision Res, 39(15): p. 2569–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Humayun MS, Weiland JD, Fujii GY, et al. (2003), Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vision Res, 43(24): p. 2573–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kaido T, Hoshida T, Taoka T, Sakaki T (2004), Retinotopy with coordinates of lateral occipital cortex in humans. J Neurosurg, 101(1): p. 114–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kandel E, Schwartz J, Jesell T (2000), Principles of Neural Science, 4 ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kruskal JB (1964), Nonmetric multidimensional-scaling – a numerical-method. Psychometrika, 29(2): p. 115–29.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marg E, Rudiak D (1994), Phosphenes induced by magnetic stimulation over the occipital brain – description and probable site of stimulation. Optom Vis Sci, 71(5): p. 301–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Milam AH, Li ZY, Fariss RN (1998), Histopathology of the human retina in retinitis pigmentosa. Prog Retin Eye Res, 17(2): p. 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mladejovsky MG, Eddington DK, Evans JR, Dobelle WH (1976), A computer-based brain stimulation system to investigate sensory prostheses for the blind and deaf. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 23(4): p. 286–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ray PG, Meador KJ, Epstein CM, et al. (1998), Magnetic stimulation of visual cortex: factors influencing the perception of phosphenes. J Clin Neurophysiol, 15(4): p. 351–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schmidt EM, Bak MJ, Hambrecht FT, et al. (1996), Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical microstimulation of the visual cortex. Brain, 119: p. 507–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Veraart C, Raftopoulos C, Mortimer JT, et al. (1998), Visual sensations produced by optic nerve stimulation using an implanted self-sizing spiral cuff electrode. Brain Res, 813: p. 181–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Veraart C, Wanet-Defalque MC, Gerard B, et al. (2003), Pattern recognition with the optic nerve visual prosthesis. Artif Organs, 27(11): p. 996–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang L, Chai X, Ling S, et al. (2009), Dispersion and accuracy of simulated phosphene positioning using tactile board. Artif Organs, 33(12): p. 1109–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lions Vision Research and Rehabilitation Center, Wilmer Eye InstituteJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations