Material Cultural Macroevolution

Abstract

Defining “evolution” simply as the fate of transmissible information allows comparisons to be drawn between the domains of biological and material cultural evolution. “Genes” are real corporeal information-bearing entities, whereas “memes” are particles of information known only from specifiable bits of cultural phenomena—including material culture.

Genetically based information transfer is vertical in all but bacterial and certain plant clades; in contrast, information transfer in material cultural systems is both horizontal and vertical. Phylogenetic analytic protocols developed for biological systems generally work poorly for complex material cultural domains—as rampant horizontal transfer between “clades” generally precludes simple resolution of evolutionary trees. In addition, independent solution of design problems in material cultural systems (the “Hannah Principle”; (Eldredge 2006; Tëmkin and Eldredge 2007)) vitiates any exact analogy with biological homology. Material cultural systems and their evolutionary histories are therefore inherently more complex than biological systems.

The dual hierarchies of economics (“ecology”) and genetic information that suffice to describe the structure and dynamical evolutionary process of biological systems are necessary but insufficient to characterize material cultural systems. A dual information/economic system consisting of makers/manufacturers lies between the general economic “marketplace” and information hierarchies in material cultural systems. Using a database of design diversity and history of the cornet—a brass wind instrument—allows comparison with the “sloshing bucket” notion of hierarchy interaction in biological evolution (Eldredge 2003). I conclude that stasis, gradual evolution and “turnovers” are important patterns in material cultural evolution—and that “key innovations” seldom trigger major evolutionary events in either biological or material cultural systems.

References

  1. Boyd, R. and P.J. Richerson (1985). Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dawkins, R. (1982). The Extended Phenotype. San Francisco: H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
  4. Eldredge, N. (1997). Evolution in the marketplace. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 8, 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eldredge, N. (2000). Biological and material cultural evolution: Are there any true parallels? Perspectives in Ethology 13, 113–153.Google Scholar
  6. Eldredge, N. (2002). An overview of piston-valved cornet history. Historic Brass Society Journal 14, 337–390.Google Scholar
  7. Eldredge, N. (2003a). The Sloshing Bucket: How the physical realm controls evolution. In J. Crutchfield and P. Schuster (eds.), Evolutionary Dynamics. Exploring the Interplay of Selection, Accident, Neutrality, and Function. SFI Studies in the Sciences of Complexity Series (pp. 3–32). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Eldredge, N. (2003b). Mme. F. Besson and the early history of the Périnet valve. The Galpin Society Journal, LVI, 147–151.Google Scholar
  9. Eldredge, N. (2006). Foreword. In C. Lipo, M.J. O’Brien, M. Collard and S.J. Shennan (eds.), Mapping Our Ancestors. Phylogenetic Approaches in Anthropology and Prehistory (pp. xiii–xvi). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Eldredge, N. (2008). Hierarchies and the sloshing bucket: Toward the unification of evolutionary biology. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1:10–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eldredge, N. and S.J. Gould (1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T.J.M. Schopf (ed.), Models in Paleobiology (pp. 82–115). San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper and Co.Google Scholar
  12. Eldredge, N. and S. N. Salthe (1984). Hierarchy and evolution. Oxford Reviews in Evolutionary Biology 1, 182–206.Google Scholar
  13. Hazen, M. H. and R. M. Hazen (1987). The Music Men. An Illustrated History of Brass Bands in America, 1800–1920. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lewis, H.M. (1991). How the cornet became a trumpet—the instruments and music of a transitional period in American music: 1880–1925. ITG Journal 16,17–26.Google Scholar
  15. Lipo, C., M.J., O’Brien, M. Collard and S.J. Shennan (eds.) (2006). Mapping Our Ancestors. Phylogenetic Approaches in Anthropology and Prehistory. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Pagel, M., C. Venditti and A. Meade (2006). Large punctuational contribution of speciation to evolutionary divergence at the molecular level. Science 314, 119–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tëmkin, I. and N. Eldredge (2007). Phylogenetics and material cultural evolution. Current Anthropology 48, 146–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. van Dam, J.A. (2006). Long-period astronomical forcing of mammal turnover. Nature 443, 687–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vrba, E.S. (1985). Environment and evolution: Alternative causes of the temporal distribution of evolutionary events. South African Journal of Science 81, 229–236.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The American Museum of Natural HistoryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations