Integration of Agents and Data Mining in Interactive Web Environment for Psychometric Diagnostics

  • Velibor IlićEmail author


Information technologies are intensively used in modern psychometric. Interactive environment for psychometrics diagnostics enables evaluation of cognitive capabilities using several multimedial tests, collecting information about users, organizing this information in user’s personal profiles, visualization, interpretation and analysis of tests results, control over procedure of testing and making conclusions on collected data. Agents supervise user’s actions in the interactive environment and they are trying to adjust questionnaires, diagnostic tests, training programs and other integrated tools to user’s personal needs making this environment easier for use. Interactive environment contains agents for helping users in process registration, agents for guiding users trough process of diagnostics and training, and agents for helping psychologists in their activities on this system. Internet environment that contains diagnostic tests and questionnaires generates large volumes of data that should be processed. Data mining is integrated in interactive environment for diagnostic of cognitive functions and it’s used for searching of potentially interesting information that this data contains. Agents use data mining system to make their decisions more precise.


Data Mining Interactive Environment Intelligent Agent Computerize Adaptive Testing Cognitive Capability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Andreevskaia, A., Abi-Aad, R., Radhakrishnan, T.,: “Agent-Mediated Knowledge Acquisition for User Profiling”, Intelligent Agents for Data Mining and Information Retrieval, Idea Group Inc (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berger, T.: “Computer-Based Technological Applications in Psychotherapy Training”, Journal of Clinical Psychology 60(3), pp. 301–315. (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buchanan, T., Smith, J.L,: “Using The Internet For Psychological Research: Personality Testing on the World Wide Web”, British Journal of Psychology, 90 125–144. (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bugbee Jr., A.C,: “The equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computer-based testing”, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(3) 282–290. (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Díaz Pace J. A., Berdún L. S., Amandi A. A., Campo M. R.,: “Towards Advising Design Patterns Application through Interface Agents”, Proc. of Argentine Symposium on Software Engineering, pp. 1–18 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Emmelkamp, P. M.G.,: “Technological Innovations in Clinical Assessment and Psychotherapy”, Psychother Psychosom 2005;74, pp 336–343 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Godoy D., Amandi A.,: “An Agent-Based Recommender System to Support Collaborative Web Search Based on Shared User Interests”, J.M. Haake, S.F. Ochoa, and A. Cechich (Eds.): CRIWG 2007, LNCS 4715, pp. 303–318 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hand, P., Mannila H., Padhraic S.,: “Principles of Data Mining”, The MIT Press, ISBN: 026208290x (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ilić, V.,: “Evolutionary Neuro Autonomous Agents”, Neurel 6th - IEEE Conference of Neural Network in Electrical Engineering, pp 37–40, (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ilić, V., “Integration adaptive psychometric tests in interactive web environment”, ICCC2008, IEEE 6th International Conference on Computational Cybernetics, pp. 277–281, Stará Lesná, Slovakia, (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ilić, V.,: “Interactive environment based on Internet technologies for psychometric diagnostics, psychotherapy and collaboration”, WI-IAT 2008 Workshops proceedings, 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, IEEE Computer Society Press, Sydney, (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ilić, V.,: “Model of data analysis on interactive web environment for psychometric diagnostics of cognitive functions”, ICCC2008, IEEE 6th International Conference on Computational Cybernetics, pp. 277–281, Stará Lesná, Slovakia, (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee I., (2005) “Data Mining Coupled Conceptual Spaces for Intelligent Agents in Data-Rich Environments”, R. Khosla et al. (Eds.): KES 2005, LNAI 3684, pp. 42–48, Springer-Verlag Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kantardzic, M.,: “Data Mining: Concepts, Models, Methods, and Algorithms”, John Wiley and Sons Massachusetts, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim, J. S.,: “Customized Recommendation Mechanism Based on Web Data Mining and Case-Based Reasoning”, Intelligent Agents for Data Mining and Information Retrieval, Idea Group Inc (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McGhee, D. E., Lowell, N.,: “Psychometric Properties of Student Ratings of Instruction in Online and On-Campus Courses”, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no 96, pp 39–48 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meijer, R.R., Nering, M.L,: “Computerized Adaptive Testing: Overview and Introduction”, Applied Psychological Measurement, 23 (3) 187–194. (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mitkas P. A., Kehagias D., Symeonidis A. L., Athanasiadis I. N.,: “A Framework for Constructing Multi-Agent Applications and Training Intelligent Agents”, Fourth International Workshop on Agent-Oriented Software Engineering AOSE 2003, Melbourne, Australia, 2003.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mohammadian, M., Jentzsch, R.,: “Computational Intelligence Techniques Driven Intelligent Agents for Web Data Mining and Information Retrieval”, Intelligent Agents for Data Mining and Information Retrieval, Idea Group Inc (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Newman, M. G.,: “Technology in psychotherapy: An introduction”, Journal of Clinical Psychology, no 2, vol 60, pp 141–145 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Owrang, M. O., “Discovering Implicit Knowledge from Data Warehouses”, Encyclopedia of Communities of Practice in Information And Knowledge Management, pp 131–137, Idea Group Inc (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Patel M., Duke M.,: “Knowledge Discovery in an Agents Environment”, J. Davies et al. (Eds.): ESWS 2004, LNCS 3053, pp. 121–136, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pauleen, D.,: “Virtual Teams: Projects, Protocols, and Processes”, Idea Group Publishing, ISBN:1591402255 (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Percevic, R., Lambert, M. J., Kordy, H.,: “Computer-supported monitoring of patient treatment response”, Journal of Clinical Psychology, no 3, vol 60, pp 285–299 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schmitz, N., Hartkamp, N., Brinschwitz, C., Michalek, S., Tress, W.,: “Comparison of the standard and the computerized versions of the Symptom Check List (SCL-90-R): a randomized trial”, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 102, 147–152. (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sklar, E., Blair, A. D., Funes, P., Pollack, J.,: “Training Intelligent Agents Using Human Internet Data”, Proceedings of the First Asia-Pacific Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, World Scientific, 354–363. (1999)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Suh, P., Addey, D., Thiemecke, D., Ellis, J.,: “Content Management Systems”, Glasshaus, ISBN:190415106X (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tate, D. F., Zabinski, M. F.,: “Computer and Internet applications for psychological treatment: Update for clinicians”, Journal of Clinical Psychology, no 2, vol 60, pp 209–220 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wright, R. P.,: “Mapping cognitions to better understand attitudinal and behavioral responses in appraisal research”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, no 3, vol 25, pp 339–374 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang C., Zhang Z., Cao L.,: “Agents and Data Mining: Mutual Enhancement by Integration”, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Autonomous Intelligent Systems: Agents and Data Mining, LNAI, Springer, (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Novi SadNovi SadSerbia

Personalised recommendations