Piezoelectric-Based Systems Modeling

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Building upon the preceding chapters in this part, we present a comprehensive treatment of piezoelectric-based systems modeling including lumped-parameters and distributed-parameters representations for both stacked and laminar configurations. The materials given in this chapter shall prepare the readers for vibration-control systems using piezoelectric actuators and sensors discussed extensively in Chap. 9.

Keywords

Mode Shape Piezoelectric Material Virtual Work Piezoelectric Actuator Piezoelectric Layer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abu-Hilal M (2003) Forced vibration of Euler-Bernoulli beams by means of dynamic Green functions. J Sound Vib 267:191–207MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afshari M, Jalili N (2008) Nanomechanical cantilever biosensors: Conceptual design, recent developments and practical implementation, chapter 13 of biomedical applications of vibration and acoustics for imaging and characterization. ASME Press 13:353–374Google Scholar
  3. Ballas RG (2007) Piezoelectric multilayer beam bending actuators: Static and dynamic behavior and aspects of sensor integration, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  4. Bashash S (2008) Modeling and control of piezoactive micro and nano systems. PhD Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SCGoogle Scholar
  5. Bashash S, Salehi-Khojin A, Jalili N (2008a) Forced vibration analysis of flexible Euler-Bernoulli beams with geometrical discontinuities. Proceedings of the 2008 American control conference, Seattle, WA, (June 2008)Google Scholar
  6. Berger R, Gerber Ch, Gimzewski JK (1996) Thermal analysis using micromechanical calorimeter. Appl Phys Lett 69(1):40–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braun T, Barwich V, Ghatkesar MK, Bredekamp AH, Gerber C, Hegner M, Lang HP (2005) Micromechanical mass sensors for biomolecular detection in a physiological environment. Phys Rev 72:031907Google Scholar
  8. Chu C-H, Shih W-P, Chung S-Y, Tsai H-C, Shing T-K, Chang P-Z (2007) A low actuation voltage electrostatic actuator for RF MEMS switch applications. J Micromech Microeng 17:1649–1656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dadfarnia M, Jalili N, Liu Z, Dawson DM (2004a) An observer-based piezoelectric control of flexible Cartesian robot arms: theory and experiment. Control Eng Pract 12:1041–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dankert H, Dankert J (1995) Technische Mechanik, vol 2. Auflage B.G. Teubner, StuttgartCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dareing DW, Thundat T (2005) Simulation of adsorption-induced stress of a microcantilever sensor. J Appl Phys 97:043526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gahlin R, Jacobson S (1998) Novel method to map and quantify wear on a micro-scale. Wear 222:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ge SS, Lee TH, Zhu G (1998a) Asymptotically stable end-point regulation of a flexible SCARA/cartesian robot. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 3(2):138–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giessibl FJ (2003) Advances in atomic force microscopy. Rev Modern Phys 75:949–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonda S, Doi T, Kurosawa T, Tanimura Y, Hisata N, Yamagishi T, Fujimoto H, Yukawa H (1999) Accurate topographic images using a measuring atomic force microscope. Appl Surf Sci 144–145:505–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grigorov AV, Davis ZJ, Rasmussen PA, Boisen A (2004) A longitudinal thermal actuation principle for mass detection using a resonant microcantilever in a fluid medium. Microelectronic Eng 73–74:881–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hesselbach J, Ritter R, Thoben R, Reich C, Pokar G (1998) Visual control and calibration of parallel robots for microassembly. Proceedings of SPIE, vol 3519. Boston, MA, pp 50–61Google Scholar
  18. Jalili N, Laxminarayana K (2004) A review of atomic force microscopy imaging systems: Application to molecular metrology and biological sciences. Mechatronics 14:907–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jalili N, Dadfarnia M, Dawson DM (2004) A fresh insight into the microcantilever-sample interaction problem in non-contact atomic force microscopy. ASME J Dyn Sys Measur Cont 126(2):327–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee H-C, Park J-H, Park Y-H (2007) Development of shunt type ohmic RF MEMS switches actuated by piezoelectric cantilever. Sens Actuators A 136:282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lopez SJ, Miribel CP, Montane E, Puig VM, Bota SA, Samitier J, Simu U, Johansson S (2001) High accuracy piezoelectric-based microrobot for biomedical applications. IEEE Symp Emer Technol Factory Autom ETFA 2:603–609Google Scholar
  22. Mahmoodi SN, Afshari M, Jalili N (2008a) Nonlinear vibrations of piezoelectric microcantilevers for biologically-induced surface stress sensing. J Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 13:1964–1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Majumdar A, Lai J, Chandrachood M, Nakabeppu O, Wu Y, Shi Z (1995) Thermal imaging by atomic force microscopy using thermocouple cantilever probes. Rev Sci Instrum 66:3584–3592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McFarland AW, Poggi MA, Doyle MJ, Bottomley LA, Colton JS (2005) Influence of surface stress on the resonance behavior of microcantilevers. Appl Phys Lett 87:053505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miyahara K, Nagashima N, Ohmura T, Matsuoka S (1999) Evaluation of mechanical properties in nanometer scale using AFM-based nanoindentation tester. Nanostruct Mater 12:1049–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moheimani SOR, Fleming AJ (2006) Piezoelectric transducers for vibration control and damping, Springer, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Nagashima N, Matsuoka S, Miyahara K (1996) Nanoscopic hardness measurement by atomic force microscope. JSME Int J Series A Mech Mater Eng 39:456–462Google Scholar
  28. Preumont A (2002) Vibration control of active structures: An introduction, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Rao SS (2007) Vibration of continuous systems, Wiley, Hoboken NJGoogle Scholar
  30. Ren Q, Zhao Y-P (2004) Influence of surface stress on frequency of microcantilever-based biosensors. Microsyst Technol 10:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Salehi-Khojin A, Bashash S, Jalili N (2008) Modeling and experimental vibration analysis of nanomechanical cantilever active probes. J Micromech Microeng 18, 085008:1–11Google Scholar
  32. Schmoeckel F, Fahlbusch S, Seyfried J, Buerkle A, Fatikow S (2000) Development of a microrobot-based micromanipulation cell in scanning electron microscope (SEM). Proc SPIE 4194:13-20, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  33. Shi L, Plyasunov S, Bachtold A, McEuen PL, Majumdar A (2000) Scanning thermal microscopy of carbon nanotubes using batch-fabricated probes. Appl Phys Lett 77:4295–4297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Susuki Y (1996) Novel microcantilever for scanning thermal imaging microscopy. Jpn J Appl Phys 35:L352–L354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thundat T, Warmack RJ, Chen GY, Allison DP (1994) Thermal and ambient-induced deflections of scanning force microscope cantilevers. Appl Phys Lett 64:2894–2898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vora K, Bashash S, Jalili N (2008) Modeling and forced vibration analysis of rod-like solid-state actuators. Proceedings of the 2008 ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference (DSCC’08), Ann Arbor, MI (Oct 20–22, 2008)Google Scholar
  37. Wu G, Ji H, Hansen K, Thundat T, Datar R, Cote R, Hagan MF, Chakraborty AK, Majumdar A (2001) Origin of nanomechanical cantilever motion generated from bimolecular interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:1560–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ziegler C (2004) Cantilever-based biosensors. Anal Bioanal Chem 379:946–959Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering373 Snell Engineering Center Northeastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations