We Can Think with the Implicit, As Well As with Fully-Formed Concepts

  • Eugene T. Gendlin


We can now adopt a new understanding of scientific knowledge and its role in our society. The concepts which science presents change every year. Neither today’s nor next year’s concepts are representations of reality. Many people mistrust science altogether and gladly adopt anything from any other source. Our best thinkers also attest to the fact that every picture, every representation, every theory and set of concepts can break down and be found false.


Direct Reference Separable Part Discrete Unit Discrete Entity Living Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Crease, R.P. (2004). Philosophy of Science: How Science Moves. The Folio, 19(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  2. Gendlin, E.T. (2004). Introduction to ‘Thinking at the Edge.’ The Folio, 19(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  3. Gendlin, E.T. (1997a). A process model. New York: The Focusing Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Gendlin, E.T. (1997b). The responsive order: A new empiricism. Man and World, 30 (3), 383–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gendlin, E.T. (1997c). Paper edition. Experiencing and the creation of meaning: A philosophical and psychological approach to the subjective. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gendlin, E.T. (1995). Crossing and dipping: some terms for approaching the interface between natural understanding and logical formulation. Minds and Machines 5 (4), 547–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gendlin, E.T. (1992). The primacy of the body, not the primacy of perception. Man and World, 25 (3–4), 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gendlin, E.T. (1991). Thinking beyond patterns: body, language and situations. In B. den Ouden and M. Moen (Eds.), The presence of feeling in thought, pp. 25–151. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  9. All Gendlin articles are also available on, Gendlin Online Library.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations