Milieus of Creativity pp 269-277

Part of the Knowledge and Space book series (KNAS, volume 2) | Cite as

Geophilosophy and Creative Milieus

  • Stephan Günzel

Milieu is a concept that stems from the natural sciences. It is regularly used to describe the state of being of a given setting, predominantly one involving fluids. Insofar as an autonomous subject is not imaginable within a milieu, this use gives a nonhumanistic, even antihumanistic, spin on the idea of milieu when it refers to the social sphere. The concept of milieu thus includes a world model similar to that encompassed by the concept of environment–but even more rigorous. Within an environment a person is still someone in it, with nature or the social world around it. By contrast, “in” a milieu (which literally means “middle” or “medium”) implies that there is no outside and, hence, no inside: A milieu by definition is absolute, extensive, and embracing. It is therefore metasubjective and metaobjective at the same time. Nevertheless, it is not to be thought of as deterministic, for it is no more and no less than a medium, a possibility for events. Speaking of a “creative milieu” is rather tautological, for a milieu per se allows for things to be created and for changes to take place. When introduced into social analysis, however, the idea of creative milieu implies the existence of milieus that are not creative or that were not creative at a certain point in history and geography. In this regard a certain fallacy can be avoided. Even though a milieu is something that can be addressed in time and space, its impact (except in biology) cannot be traced back to the milieu's natural properties—only to other social and political properties operating at a given time and place. This characteristic is the main insight of geophilosophy as defined by the French philosophers Deleuze and Guattari (1991/1994), who ultimately follow the concept back to the German writer Friedrich Nietzsche. According to all three thinkers, geophilosophy can be summarized as the idea that philosophy or science in general needs a creative milieu to develop and that this milieu event, though it can be localized in time and space, is not explicable as being caused by the natural features of that specific environment. Identifying creative milieus within the history of science or a geography of ideas is thus not one topic among others but rather the central issue.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baudrillard, J. (1994). The illusion of the end (C. Turner, Trans.). Cambridge, England: Polity (Original work published 1992).Google Scholar
  2. Bonta, M. & Protevi, J. (2004). Deleuze and geophilosophy: A guide and glossary. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Buttimer, A. (1993). Geography and the human spirit. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cuvier, G. (1829). A discourse on the revolutions of the surface of the globe, and the changes thereby produced in the animal kingdom. London: Whittaker, Treacher ɦ Arnot (Original work published 1825).Google Scholar
  5. Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? (H. Tomlinson & G. Burchill, Trans.). London: Verso (Original work published 1991).Google Scholar
  6. Devall, B. (1985). Deep ecology. Salt Lake City, UT: Smith.Google Scholar
  7. Elden, S. (2001). Mapping the present: Heidegger, Foucault and the project of a spatial history. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  8. Foucault, M. (1986). Of other spaces (J. Miskowiec, Trans.). Diacritics, 16, 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gould, S. (1987). Time's arrow—Time's cycle: Myth and metaphor in the discovery of geological time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Günzel, S. (2003). Nietzsche's geophilosophy. Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 25, 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hegel, G. W. F. (1975). Lectures on the philosophy of world history: Introduction (H. B. Nisbet, Trans.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press (Original work published 1837, this edition 1955).Google Scholar
  12. Hume, D. (1963). An enquiry concerning human understanding (L. A. Selby-Bigge, Ed.). Oxford, England: Clarendon (Original work published 1748, this edition 1902).Google Scholar
  13. Kant, I. (1983). Idea for a universal history with a cosmopolitan purpose (T. Humphrey, Trans.). In I. Kant (Ed.), Perpetual peace and other essays on politics, history, and morals (pp. 29–39). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett (Original work published 1784).Google Scholar
  14. Lubbock, J. (1870). The origin of civilisation and the primitive condition of man: Mental and social condition of savages. London: Longmans/Green.Google Scholar
  15. Lyell, C. (1990). Principles of geology, being an attempt to explain the former changes of the Earth's surface by reference to causes now in operation (3 Vols.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (Original work published 1830–1833).Google Scholar
  16. Lyotard, J.AF. (1990). Heidegger and ‘the Jews’ (A. Michel & M. S. Roberts, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press (Original work published 1988).Google Scholar
  17. Meusburger, P. (2000). The spatial concentration of knowledge: Some theoretical considerations. Erdkunde, 54, 352–364.Google Scholar
  18. Mill, J. S. (2002). A system of logic: Ratiocinative and inductive, being a connected view of the principles of evidence, and the methods of scientific investigation. Honolulu, HI: University Press of the Pacific (Original work published 1843, this edition 1891).Google Scholar
  19. Nietzsche, F. (1988). Kritische Studienausgabe (G. Colli & M. Montinari, Ed.) (15 Vols). Berlin/ New York: de Gruyter (Not yet fully translated as The complete works [E. Behler, Ed.]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Pickles, J. (1985). Phenomenology, science and geography: Spatiality and the human sciences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ratzel, F. (1882). Anthropo-Geographie oder Grundzüge der Anwendung der Erdkunde auf die Geschichte [Anthropogeography or principles of applying geography to history]. Stuttgart, Germany: Engelhorn.Google Scholar
  22. Rée, P. (2003). The origin of the moral sensations (R. Small, Trans.). In R. Small (Ed.), Basic writings (pp. 83–167). Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press (Original work published 1877).Google Scholar
  23. Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.Google Scholar
  24. Seamon, D. (1979). A geography of the lifeworld: Movement, rest and encounter. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  25. Soja, E. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  26. Thrift, N. J. (1996). Spatial formations. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephan Günzel
    • 1
  1. 1.Philosophische Fakultät/MedienwissenschaftJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations