Toward Information Infrastructure Studies: Ways of Knowing in a Networked Environment

  • Geoffrey C. Bowker
  • Karen Baker
  • Florence Millerand
  • David Ribes
Chapter

Abstract

This article presents Information Infrastructure Studies, a research area that takes up some core issues in digital information and organization research. Infrastructure Studies simultaneously addresses the technical, social, and organizational aspects of the development, usage, and maintenance of infrastructures in local communities as well as global arenas. While infrastructure is understood as a broad category referring to a variety of pervasive, enabling network resources such as railroad lines, plumbing and pipes, electrical power plants and wires, this article focuses on information infrastructure, such as computational services and help desks, or federating activities such as scientific data repositories and archives spanning the multiple disciplines needed to address such issues as climate warming and the biodiversity crisis. These are elements associated with the internet and, frequently today, associated with cyberinfrastructure or e-science endeavors. We argue that a theoretical understanding of infrastructure provides the context for needed dialogue between design, use, and sustainability of internet-based infrastructure services. This article outlines a research area and outlines overarching themes of Infrastructure Studies. Part one of the paper presents definitions for infrastructure and cyberinfrastructure, reviewing salient previous work. Part two portrays key ideas from infrastructure studies (knowledge work, social and political values, new forms of sociality, etc.). In closing, the character of the field today is considered.

Keywords

Cyberinfrastructure Cyberscholarship Information infrastructure Social analysis information systems 

References

  1. Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arthur, B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ashby, W. R. (1956). Introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Atkins, D. E., Droegemeier, K. K., Feldman, S. I., Garcia-Molina, H., Klein, M. L., Messerschmitt, D. G., et al. (2003). Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure. Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, K. S., & Millerand, F. (2007, January 3–6). Articulation work supporting information infrastructure design: Coordination, categorization, and assessment in practice. Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Big Island, Hawaii, IEEE Computer Society, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  6. Beniger, J. R. (1986). The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Berg, M., & Timmermans, S. (2000). Orders and their others: On the constitution of universalities in medical work. Configurations, 8, 31–61.Google Scholar
  8. Bowker, G. C. (1994). Science on the run: Information management and industrial geophysics at schlumberger, 1920–1940. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bowker, G. C. (2000). Biodiversity datadiversity. Social Studies of Science, 30(5), 643–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bowker, G. C., Timmermans, S., & Star, S. L. (1995). Infrastructure and organizational transformation: Classifying nurses’ work. In W. Orlikowski, G. Walsham, M. R. Jones, & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Information technology and changes in organizational work (pp. 344–370). London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Brand, S. (1999). The clock of the long now: Time and responsibility: The ideas behind the world’s slowest computer. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Bratteteig, T. (2003). Making change: Dealing with relations between design and use. PhD Thesis, University of Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  14. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Chandler, A. D., Jr., & Cortada, J. W. (2003). A nation transformed by information: How information has shaped the United States from Colonial times to the present (pp. 185–226). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Chandler, A. D., & Hikino, T. (1994). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  17. Clanchy, M. T. (1993). From memory to written record, England 1066–1307 (2nd ed.). Oxford, Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. David, P. (1985). Computer and dynamo: The modern productivity paradox in a not-too-distant mirror. Stanford: Center for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  19. Desmond, A. J., & Moore, J. R. (1991). Darwin. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
  20. Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Edwards, P. (2003). Infrastructure and modernity: Force, time, and social organization. In T. J. Misa, P. Brey, & A. Feenberg (Eds.), The history of sociotechnical systems. Modernity and technology (pp. 185–226). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Edwards, P. N., Jackson, S. J., Bowker, G. C., & Knobel, C. (2007). Understanding infrastructure: Dynamics, tensions, and design. NSF Report of a Workshop on “History & Theory of Infrastructure: Lessons for New Scientific Cyberinfrastructures”. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/49353.
  23. Engestrom, Y. (1990). Learning, working, and imagining. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsutit Og.Google Scholar
  24. Epstein, S. (2007). Inclusion: The politics of difference in medical research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Franklin, M., Halevy, A., & Maier, D. (2005). From databases to dataspaces: A new abstraction for information management. SIGMOD Record, 34(4), 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  28. Goody, J. (1987). The interface between the written and the oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E., & Hatling, M. (1996). Developing information infrastructure: The tension between standardization and flexibility. Science, Technology & Human Values, 21(4), 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hayden, C. (2003). When nature goes public: The making and unmaking of bioprospecting in Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hedstrom, M., Dawes, S., Fleischhauer, C., Gray, J., Lynch, C., McCrary, V., et al. (2002). It’s about time: Research challenges in digital archiving and long-term preservation committee: NSF-DGO Report on NSF Workshop on research challenges in digital archiving. Digital Gov Program, NSF Div of Info and Intelligent Systems.Google Scholar
  32. Hobbie, J. E., Carpenter, S. R., Grimm, N. B., Gosz, J. R., & Seastedt, T. R. (2003). The US long term ecological research program. BioScience, 53(2), 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C. A. (1990). Champions of technological innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 317–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hughes, T. P. (1983). Networks of power: Electrification in western society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hughes, T. P. (1989). Evolution of large technological systems. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 51–82). Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Karasti, H., & Baker, K. (2004, January). Infrastructuring for the long-term: Ecological information management. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. HICSS38, IEEE Computer Society, Big Island, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  37. Karasti, H., Baker, K. S., & Halkola, E. (2006). Enriching the notion of data curation in eScience: Data managing and information infrastructuring in the long term ecological research (LTER) network. In M. Jirotka, R. Procter, T. Rodden, & G. Bowker (Eds.), Computer Supported Cooperative Work: An International Journal. Special Issue: Collaboration in e-Research, 15(4), 321–358.Google Scholar
  38. Kirk, S. A., & Kutchins, H. (1992). The selling of the DSM: The rhetoric of science in psychiatry. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  39. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  40. Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology, building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Latour, B. (1993). La Clef de Berlin et Autres Leçons d’un Amateur de Sciences. Paris: La Decouverte.Google Scholar
  42. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  43. Lawrence, K. A. (2006). Walking the tightrope: The balancing acts of a large e-Research project. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15(4), 385–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leibniz, G. W., Clarke, S., & Alexander, H. G. (1998). The Leibniz-Clarke correspondence. New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  47. MacKenzie, D. (1993). Inventing accuracy: A historical sociology of nuclear missile guidance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  48. Magnuson, J. J. (1990). Long-term ecological research and the invisible present. BioScience, 40(7), 495–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Millerand, F., & Bowker, G. C. (2009). Metadata standards, trajectories and enactment in the life of an ontology. In S. L. Star & M. Lampland (Eds.), Formalizing practices: Reckoning with standards, numbers and models in science and everyday life (pp. 149–167). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Monteiro, E., & Hanseth, O. (1997). Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards. Science, Technology & Human Values, 21(4), 407–426.Google Scholar
  51. Nardi, B., & O’Day, V. (1996). Intelligent agents: What we learned at the library. Libri, 46, 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. NSF Cyberinfrastructure Council (2006). NSF’s cyberinfrastructure vision for 21st century discovery (Version 7.1). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/od/oci/ci-v7.pdf
  53. Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Porter, T. M. (1986). The rise of statistical thinking, 1820–1900. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Ribes, D. (2006). Universal informatics: Building cyberinfrastructure, interoperating the geosciences. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology (Science Studies), University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
  56. Ribes, D., & Baker, K. S. (2007). Modes of social science engagement in community infrastructure design. Proceedings of Third International Conference on Communities and Technology, Springer, London, pp. 107–130.Google Scholar
  57. Ribes, D., & Bowker, G. C. (2008). GEON: Organizing for interdisciplinary collaboration. In G. M. Olson, J. S. Olson, & A. Zimmerman (Eds.), Science on the internet (pp. 311–330). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  58. Sawyer, S., & Tapia, A. (2006). Always articulating: Theorizing on mobile and wireless technologies. The Information Society, 22(5), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (1992). Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1(1), 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schon, D. A. (1963). Champions for radical new inventions. Harvard Business Review, 41, 77–86.Google Scholar
  61. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Serres, M. (1990). Le Contrat Naturel. Paris: Editions Françous Bourin.Google Scholar
  63. Shapin, A. P. (1989). The invisible technician. American Scientist, 77, 554–563.Google Scholar
  64. Sowa, J. (2000). Knowledge representation: Logical, hilosophical, and computational foundations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  65. Star, S. L. (1991). The sociology of the invisible: The primacy of work in the writings of Anselm Strauss. In D. Maines (Ed.), Social organization and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss (pp. 265–283). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  66. Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1994, October 22–26). Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: Complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 94 – Transcending Boundaries), Chapel Hill, NC. ACM Press, New York, pp. 253–264.Google Scholar
  68. Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stinchcombe, A. (1990). Information and organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  70. Strauss, A. (1988). The articulation of project work: An organizational process. The Sociological Quarterly, 29(2), 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Strauss, A. L. (1993). Continual permutations of action. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  72. Tort, P. (1989). La Raison Classificatoire: Les complexes Discursifs – Quinze Etudes. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
  73. Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  74. Weiner, N. (1951). Cybernetics and society. New York, NY: Executive Techniques.Google Scholar
  75. Yates, J. (1989). Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoffrey C. Bowker
    • 1
  • Karen Baker
    • 2
  • Florence Millerand
    • 3
  • David Ribes
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Information Sciences, University of PittsburgPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Integrative Oceanography DivisionSIO University of California at San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  3. 3.Département de communication sociale et publique, Faculté de communicationUniversité du Québec à MontréalMontréalCanada
  4. 4.Communication, Culture and TechnologyGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonDistrict of Columbia

Personalised recommendations