Nanomaterials: Risks and Benefits pp 369-384
Strategic Approaches for the Management of Environmental Risk Uncertainties Posed by Nanomaterials
Central to the responsible development of nanotechnologies is an understanding of the risks they pose to the environment. As with any novel material or emerging technology, a scarcity of data introduces potentially high uncertainty in to the characterisation of risk. Early priorities are the identification of key areas of risk uncertainty and the strategic approach for managing and reducing these. This is important as the information subsequently gathered supports decision making and policy development. We identify one important source of uncertainty for the quantification of both hazard and exposure for nanomaterials, the complexity of their behaviour in natural systems. We then outline two approaches for managing this uncertainty, based on experiences with chemicals: one that primarily focuses on hazard and one that initially focuses on exposure. While each approach places emphasis on different information requirements a common feature is the considerable time lag between information gathering and subsequent decision making based on the evidence gathered. Complementary environmental surveillance approaches can act as a safety net, although it is not as yet clear how fit for purpose current monitoring programmes are in this regard.1
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Collingridge, D. (1980) The Social Control of Technology. Francis Pinter Ltd, London, pp 200.Google Scholar
- 7.DETR (2000) U.K. Guidelines for Environmental Risk Assessment and Management. Available online at www.defra.gov.uk/environment/risk/eramguide/index.htm, last accessed 23 July 2008.Google Scholar
- 11.HM Government (2005) Characterising the Potential Risks Posed by Engineered Nanoparticles: A First UK Government Research Report. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, HM Government, pp 57. PB 11485. Available online at http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/nanotech/nrcg/, last accessed 23 July 2008.Google Scholar
- 13.Linkov, I., and Satterstrom, K. (2008). Nanomaterial risk assessment and risk management: Review of regulatory frameworks. In: Linkov, I., Ferguson, E., Magar, V. (eds), Real Time and Deliberative Decision Making: Application to Risk Assessment for Non-chemical Stressors. Springer, Amsterdam 129–158.Google Scholar
- 15.OECD Environment Directorate (2008) OECD Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships [(Q)SARs] Project. Available online at http://www.oecd.org/document/23/ 0,3343,en_2649_34379_33957015_1_1_1_1,00.html, last accessed 23 July 2008.
- 18.Paquin, P.R., Gorsuch, J.W., Apte, S., Batley, G.E., Bowles, K.C., Campbell, P.G.C., Delos, C.G., Di Toro, D.M., Dwyer, R.L., Galvez, F., Gensemer, R.W., Goss, G.G., Hogstrand, C., Janssen, C.R., McGeer, J.C., Naddy, R.B., Playle, R.C., Santore, R.C., Schneider, U., Stubblefield, W.A., Wood, C.M., and Wu, K. (2002) The biotic ligand model for metals — current research, future directions, regulatory implications, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part C, 133, 3–35.Google Scholar
- 19.Poland, C.A., Duffin, R., Kinloch, I., Maynard, A., Wallace, W.A.H., Seaton, A., Stone, V., Brown, S., MacNee, W., and Donaldson, K. (2008) Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos — like pathogenicity in a pilot study, Nature Nanotechnology 3, 423–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Pollard, S.J.T. (2006) Risk Management for the Environmental Practitioner, IEMA Practitioner No. 7, Best practice series, Institute of Environmental Management & Assessment, Lincoln, UK.Google Scholar
- 21.Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (2008) Novel Materials Study, expected publication date November 2008 (http://www.rcep.org.uk/novelmaterials. htm), last accessed August 4, 2008 (in press).
- 22.Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering (2004) Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. Available online at http://www.nanotec. org.uk/finalReport.htm, last accessed 23 July 2008.