Air Pollution Monitoring and Use of Nanotechnology Based Solid State Gas Sensors in Greater Cairo Area, Egypt

  • A. B. A. Ramadan
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)


Air pollution is a serious problem in thickly populated and industrialized areas in Egypt, especially in greater Cairo area. Economic growth and industrialization are proceeding at a rapid pace, accompanied by increasing emissions of air polluting sources. Furthermore, though the variety and quantities of polluting sources have increased dramatically, the development of a suitable method for monitoring the pollution causing sources has not followed at the same pace. Environmental impacts of air pollutants have impact on public health, vegetation, material deterioration etc. To prevent or minimize the damage caused by atmospheric pollution, suitable monitoring systems are urgently needed that can rapidly and reliably detect and quantify polluting sources for monitoring by regulating authorities in order to prevent further deterioration of the current pollution levels. Consequently, it is important that the current real-time air quality monitoring system, controlled by the Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA), should be adapted or extended to aid in alleviating this problem. Nanotechnology has been applied to several industrial and domestic fields, for example, applications for gas monitoring systems, gas leak detectors in factories, fire and toxic gas detectors, ventilation control, breath alcohol detectors, and the like. Here we report an application example of studying air quality monitoring based on nanotechnology ‘solid state gas sensors’. So as to carry out air pollution monitoring over an extensive area, a combination of ground measurements through inexpensive sensors and wireless GIS will be used for this purpose. This portable device, comprising solid state gas sensors integrated to a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) linked through Bluetooth communication tools and Global Positioning System (GPS), will allow rapid dissemination of information on pollution levels at multiple sites simultaneously.


Global Position System Total Suspend Particulate Metal Oxide Sensor Egyptian Environmental Affair Agency Great Cairo Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Nasralla, M.M. (1994) Air Pollution in Greater Cairo, Comparing the health risk in Cairo, Egypt, Vol. 3, Annex G, submitted to USAID/Egypt project, 398-0365.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sturchio, N., Sultan, M., Sharkaway, M.E., and Maghraby, A. (1997) Concentration and isotopic composition of lead in urban particulate air, Cairo, Egypt, 1996, Argonne National Laboratory/Center for Environmental Hazard Mitigation, Cairo University, Argonne, IL/Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elminir, H. (2005) Dependence of urban air pollutants on meteorology, Science of the Total Environment 359 (1–3), 231.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rodes, C.E., Nasralla, M.M., and Lawless, P.A. (1996) An assessment and source apportionment of airborne particulate matter in Cairo, Egypt, Activity Report No. 22, prepared for the USAID Mission to Egypt under EHP Activity No. 133-RCm Delivery Order No. 7.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gusten, H. (1986) Formation, transport and control of photochemical smog, in Hutzinger, O. (ed.), The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Vol. 4, Part A, p. 53, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramadan, A., and Alian, A. (2007) Environmental Radiation Monitoring in the Egyptian Territories, Report No. 460 in NCNSRC, AEA, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schlink, U., Rehwagen, M., Ramadan, A., Richer, M., and Herbarth, O. (2006) Comparison of environmental security in Cairo and Berlin: Exposure of volatile organic compounds, in Risk Management Tools for Port Security, Critical Infrastructure and Sustainability, NATO Advanced Research Workshop, 16–19 March 2006, Venice, Italy.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Capone, S., Forleo, A., Francioso, L., Rella, R., Siciliano, P., Spadavecchia, J., Presicce, D.S., and Taurino, A.M. (2003) Solid state gas sensors: state of the art and future activities, Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials 5, 1335–1348.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sberveglieri, G. (1992) Gas Sensors—Principles, Operation and Development, Kluwer, Dordrecht/Germany.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hauptmann, P. (1993) Sensors: Principles and Applications, Prentice-Hall, Hertfordshire, UK.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simon, I., Barsan, N., Bauer, M., and Weimar, U. (2001) Micromachined metal oxide gas sensors: opportunities to improve sensor performance, Sensors Actuators B 73, 1– 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weimar, U., and Gopel, W. (1995) AC measurements on tin oxide sensors to improve selectivities and sensitivities, Sensors Actuators B 26/27, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gopel, W., and Schierbaum, K. (1995) SnO2 sensors: current status and future prospects, Sensors Actuators B 26/27, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marshall, J. (2002) Developing internet-based GIS applications, GIS India 11, 16–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Center for Nuclear Safety and Radiation ControlNasr CityEgypt

Personalised recommendations