Popper's Communitarianism

  • Jeff Kochan
Part of the Boston Studies in The Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 272)

In this chapter, I argue that Karl Popper was a communitarian philosopher. This will surprise some readers. Liberals often tout Popper as one of their champions. Indeed, there is no doubt that Popper shared much in common with liberals. However, I will argue that Popper rejected a central, though perhaps not essential, pillar of liberal theory, namely, individualism. This claim may seem to contradict Popper's professed methodological individualism. Yet I argue that Popper was a methodological individualist in name only. In fact, methodological individualism faded from Popper's vocabulary as he moved institutions and situational analysis more firmly to centre-stage. Popper's focus on institutions and situations constitutes what I call his communitarianism. If my interpretation is correct, then theorists in the socio logy of scientific knowledge and communitarian epistemology should reconsider their long-standing distrust of Popper's philosophy. Indeed, they may have much to gain by treating Popper as a friend rather than a foe.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackermann, Robert John. 1976. The Philosophy of Karl Popper. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  2. Agassi, Joseph. 1975. Institutional Individualism. The British Journal of Sociology 26(2): 144–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, Daniel. 1993. Communitarianism and Its Critics. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  4. Bloor, David. 1974. Popper's Mystification of Objective Knowledge. Science Studies 4(1): 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloor, David. 1991. Knowledge and Social Imagery (second edition). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bloor, David. 1997. Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Bloor, David. 2004. Institutions and Rule-Scepticism: A Reply to Martin Kusch. Social Studies of Science 34(4): 593–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bloor, David. 2007. Epistemic Grace: Antirelativism as Theology in Disguise. Common Knowledge 13(2–3): 250–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, Matthew J. 2008. Comment: ‘Popper's Communitarianism’. Commentary presented to the Canadian Philosophical Association, June 3rd, 2008, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  10. Chalmers, A. F. 1985. Methodological Individualism: An Incongruity in Popper's Philosophy. In Popper and the Human Sciences, eds. Gregory Currie and Alan Musgrave, 73–87. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  11. Cranston, Maurice. 1967. Liberalism. In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vols. 3 and 4, ed. Paul Edwards, 458–661. London: Macmillan and Free Press.Google Scholar
  12. Galston, William A. 1991. Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Geuss, Raymond. 2001. History and Illusion in Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Geuss, Raymond. 2005. Neither History nor Praxis. In Outside Ethics, idem., 29–39. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gottfried, Paul Edward. 1999. After Liberalism: Mass Democracy in the Managerial State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gray, John N. 1976. The Liberalism of Karl Popper. Government and Opposition 11: 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gutman, Amy. 1985. Communitarian Critics of Liberalism. Philosophy and Public Affairs 14(3): 308–322.Google Scholar
  18. Herf, Jeffrey. 1984. Reactionary Modernism: Technology, Culture, and Culture in Weimar and the Third Reich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kusch, Martin. 2002. Knowledge by Agreement: The Programme of Communitarian Epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  20. Kusch, Martin. 2004a. Rule-Scepticism and the Sociology of Knowledge: The Bloor-Lynch Debate Revisited. Social Studies of Science 34(4): 571–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kusch, Martin. 2004b. Reply to My Critics. Social Studies of Science 34(4): 615–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kymlicka, Will. 1989. Liberal Individualism and Liberal Neutrality. Ethics 99(4): 883–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lessnoff, Michael. 1980. The Political Philosophy of Karl Popper. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10(1): 99–120.Google Scholar
  24. Lukes, Steven 1970. Methodological Individualism Reconsidered. In Sociological Theory and Philosophical Analysis, eds. Dorothy Emmet and Alasdair MacIntyre, 76–88. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Magee, Bryan. 1973. Karl Popper. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  26. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1960. Breaking the Chains of Reason. In Out of Apathy, ed. Edward Palmer Thompson, 195–240. London: Stevens & Sons.Google Scholar
  27. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After Virtue. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Mulhall, Stephen. 1987. The Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism. Archives Européennes de Sociologie 28(2): 269–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Musgrave, Alan. 1974. The Objectivism of Popper's Epistemology. In The Philosophy of Karl Popper (vol. one), ed. Paul Arthur Schilpp, 560–596. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
  30. Neal, Patrick and David Paris. 1990. Liberalism and the Communitarian Critique: A Guide for the Perplexed. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 23(3): 419–439.Google Scholar
  31. O'Hear, Anthony. 1980. Karl Popper. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  32. Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  33. Popper, Karl Raimund. 1961. The Poverty of Historicism (third edition). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  34. Popper, Karl Raimund. 1965. Conjectures and Refutations (second edition). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Popper, Karl Raimund. 1966. The Open Society and Its Enemies, 2 vols (fifth edition). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  36. Popper, Karl Raimund. 1969. A Pluralist Approach to the Philosophy of History. In Roads to Freedom: Essays in Honour of Friedrich A. von Hayek, ed. Erich Streissler, 181–200. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  37. Popper, Karl Raimund. 1972. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  38. Quinton, Anthony. 1975. Karl Popper: Politics Without Essences. In Contemporary Political Thinkers, eds. Anthony de Crespigny and Kenneth Minogue, 147–167. New York: Dodd, Mead and Co.Google Scholar
  39. Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Rawls, John. 1985. Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs 14(3): 223–251.Google Scholar
  41. Ryan, Alan. 1985. Popper and Liberalism. In Popper and the Human Sciences, eds. Gregory Currie and Alan Musgrave, 89–104. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  42. Sandel, Michael. 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Schwarzenbach, Sibyl A. 1991. Rawls, Hegel, and Communitarianism. Political Theory 19(4): 539–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shearmur, Jeremy. 2001. Popper and Classical Liberalism. Economic Affairs, December: 37–40.Google Scholar
  45. Stelzer, Harald 2006. Popper and Communitarianism: Ethical and Political Dimensions of Democracy. In Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, Vol. 1, eds. Ian Jarvie, Karl Milford and David Miller, 231–240. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  46. Stokes, Geoffrey. 1998. Popper: Philosophy, Politics and Scientific Method. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  47. Taylor, Charles. 1979. Atomism. In Powers, Possessions, and Freedom, ed. Alkis Kontons, 39–61. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  48. Taylor, Charles. 1982. The Diversity of Goods. In Utilitarianism and Beyond, eds. Amartya Sen and Bernard Williams, 129–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Taylor, Charles. 1989. Cross-Purposes: The Liberal-Communitarian Debate. In Liberalism and the Moral Life, ed. Nancy L. Rosenblum, 159–182. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Udehn, Lars. 2001. Methodological Individualism: Background, History and Meaning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeff Kochan
    • 1
  1. 1.2-40 Assiniboia Hall Department of PhilosophyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations