Bread of the Land: The Invisibility of Manioc in the Amazon

  • Cristina Adams
  • Rui Murrieta
  • Andrea Siqueira
  • Walter Neves
  • Rosely Sanches

Abstract

A detailed analysis on the Amazonian riverine populations’ diet is presented, based on quantitative data collected by the authors amongst these populations over the last 13 years, with special emphasis on caloric and protein intake. The five communities studied in this article are sited at the estuary (Marajó Island) and Lower Amazon (Ituqui Island) regions. Grounded on almost unique quantitative data on the Amazon region riverine populations, the authors analyse in detail the influence of several local factors in these populations’ food intake variability: ecosystem, micro-environment, seasonality, history and social organisation. In a synthetic way, it can be stated that, in the case of the estuarine flood plain, the main caloric sources are represented by manioc flour and the açaí, whereas in the seasonal flood plain, manioc flour, fish and sugar play such role. Fish represents the greatest protein source, independently of the ecosystem considered. All five communities feature protein intake levels above the minimum recommended by FAO. Regarding calories, only one of the communities (one established in the estuary) meets the internationally recommended minimum for energy consumption. At the end of the article, the authors discuss the anthropological implications of the ubiquity and historical longevity of the association between manioc flour and fish as the mainstay of riverine subsistence.

Keywords

Manioc Cassava Diet Subsistence Seasonality Food consumption 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, C. (2000). Caiçaras na mata Atlântica: Pesquisa científica versus planejamento e gestão ambiental. São Paulo: Annablume.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, C. (2002a). Estratégias adaptativas de duas populações caboclas (Pará) aos ecossistemas de várzea estuarina e estacional: Uma análise comparativa. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of São PauloGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, C. (2002b). Identidade caiçara: Exclusão histórica e sócio-ambiental. In U. P. Albuquerque (Ed.), Atualidades em etnobiologia e etnoecologia. Palestras Convidadas do IV Simpósio Brasileiro de Etnobiologia e Etnoecologia (pp. 27–43). Recife: Sociedade Brasileira de Etnobiologia e Etnoecologia.Google Scholar
  4. Adams, C. (2003). The pitfalls of synchronicity: A case study of the caiçaras from the Atlantic Rainforest of South-eastern Brazil. In E. Berglund & D. G. Anderson (Eds.), Ethnographies of environmentalists: Understanding conservation strategies and the distribution of privilege (pp. 19–31). London: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  5. Adams, C., Murrieta, R. S. S., & Sanches, R. A. (2005). Agricultura e alimentação em populações ribeirinhas das várzeas do Amazonas: Novas perspectivas. Ambiente & Sociedade, 8, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barickman, B. J. (1998). A Bahian counterpoint: Sugar, tobacco, cassava, and slavery in the Recôncavo, 1780–1860. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barreto, B. M. (1939). O valor da mandioca: ‘pão dos trópicos’. Chácaras e Quintais, 60, 354.Google Scholar
  8. Beckerman, S. (1979). The abundance of protein in Amazonia: A reply to Gross. American Anthropologist, 81, 533–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beckerman, S. (1991). A Amazônia estava repleta de gente em 1492? In W. A. Neves (Ed.), Origens, adaptações e diversidade biológica do homem nativo da Amazônia (pp. 143–59). Belém: Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi/CNPq.Google Scholar
  10. Beckerman, S. (1993). Major patterns in indigenous Amazonian subsistence. In C. M. Hladick, A. Hladick, O. F. Linares, H. Pagezy, A.Semple, & M. Hadley (Eds.), Tropical forests, people and food: Biocultural interactions and applications to development (pp. 411–24). Paris: Unesco/Parthenon.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1983a). Esboço de uma teoria da prática. São Paulo: Ática.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1983b). Distinctions: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brondizio, E. S. (1996). Forest farmers: Humans and landscape ecology of caboclo populations in the Amazon Estuary. Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  14. Brondizio, E. S. (1999). Agroforestry intensification in the Amazon Estuary. In T. Granfelt (Ed.), Managing the globalized environment: Local strategies to secure livelihoods (pp. 88–113). London: Intermediate Technology Publ.Google Scholar
  15. Brondizio, E. S., & Neves, W. A. (1996). Populações caboclas do Estuário do Amazonas: A percepção do ambiente natural. In: C. Pavan (Ed.), Uma estratégia latino-americana para a Amazônia (pp. 167–82). São Paulo: Mmarhal/Memorial/Unesp.Google Scholar
  16. Brondizio, E. S., & Siqueira, A. D. (1997). From extractivists to farmers: Changing concepts of caboclo agroforestry in the Amazon estuary. Research in Economic Anthropology, 18, 233–79.Google Scholar
  17. Brondizio, E. S., Moran, E. F., Mausel, P., & Wu, Y. (1994). Land use change in the Amazon Estuary: Patterns of caboclo settlement and landscape management. Human Ecology, 22, 249–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brondizio, E. S., Moran, E. F., Mausel, P., & Wu, Y. (1996). Land cover in the Amazon Estuary: Linking of the thematic mapper with botanical and historical data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 62, 921–9.Google Scholar
  19. Câmara, E. P. L., & McGrath, D. G. (1995). A viabilidade da reserva de lago como unidade de manejo sustentável dos recursos da várzea amazônica. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi Nova Série Antropologia, 11, 87–132.Google Scholar
  20. Cândido, A. (1964). Os parceiros do Rio Bonito. Estudos sobre o caipira paulista e a transformação dos seus meios de vida. São Paulo: Duas Cidades.Google Scholar
  21. Cascudo, L. C. (1983). História da Alimentação no Brasil. Belo Horizonte: Itatiaia, São Paulo: Edusp. Vol 1.Google Scholar
  22. Carneiro, R. L. (1970). A theory of the origin of the state. Science, 169: 733–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carneiro, R. L. (1961). Slash-and-burn cultivation among the Kuikuru and its implications for cultural development in the Amazon Basin. The evolution of horticultural systems in native South America, causes and consequences, a symposium, Caracas.Google Scholar
  24. Castro, F. (1999). Fishing accords: The political ecology of fishing intensification in the Amazon. Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  25. Castro, J. (1965). Geografia da fome. O dilema brasileiro: pão ou aço. São Paulo: Brasiliense.Google Scholar
  26. Cattle, D. J., & Schwerin, K. H. (Eds.). (1985). Food energy in tropical ecosystems. New York: Gordon & Breach.Google Scholar
  27. Cerdeira, R. G. P., Ruffino, M. L., & Isaac, V. J. (1997). Consumo de pescado e outros alimentos pela população ribeirinha do Lago Grande de Monte Alegre, PA – Brasil. Acta Amazonica, 27, 213–27.Google Scholar
  28. Coimbra Jr., C. E. A., Flowers, N. M., Salzano, F. M., & Santos, R. V. (Eds.). (2004). The Xavante in transition: Health, ecology, and bioanthropology in Central Brazil. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  29. Cooke, R., & Piperno, D. (1993). Native American adaptations to the tropical forests of Central and South America before European colonization. In C. M. Hladik, A. Hladik, O. F. Linares, H. Pagezy, A. Semple, & M. Hadley (Eds.), Tropical forests, people and food: Biocultural interactions and applications to development (pp. 25–36). Paris: Unesco/Partenon.Google Scholar
  30. De Garine, I., Hugh-Jones, S., & Prinz, A. (1993). Cultural factors in food choices: Background. In C. M. Hladik, A. Hladik, O. F. Linares, H. Pagezy, A. Semple, M. Hadley (Eds.), Tropical forests, people and food: Biocultural interactions and applications to development (pp. 525–32). Paris: Unesco/Partenon.Google Scholar
  31. Dufour, D. L. (1985). Manioc as a dietary staple: Implications for the budgeting of time and energy in Northwestern Amazon. In: D. J. Cattle & K. H. Schwerin (Eds.), Food energy in tropical ecosystems (pp. 1–20). New York: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
  32. Dufour, D. L. (1992). Nutritional ecology in the tropical rain forests of Amazonia. American Journal of Human Biology, 4, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dufour, D. L. (1994). Diet and nutritional status of Amazonian peoples. In A. Roosevelt (Ed.), Amazonian indians from prehistory to present: Anthropological perspectives (pp. 151–75). Tucson/London: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  34. Emperaire, L. (2002a). O manejo da agrobiodiversidade: O exemplo da mandioca na Amazônia. In N. Bensusan (Ed.), Seria melhor mandar ladrilhar? Biodiversidade como, para que, por quê (pp. 189–201). Brasília: Editora UNB.Google Scholar
  35. Emperaire, L. (2002b). A agrobiodiversidade em risco: O exemplo das mandiocas na Amazônia. Ciência Hoje, 32, 28–33.Google Scholar
  36. FAO. (1977). Cassava processing. FAO Plant Production and Processing Series. Roma: FAO.Google Scholar
  37. FAO/WHO/UNU. (1985). Energy and protein requirements. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  38. Ferreira Filho, J. C. (1938). Manual da mandioca: A mais brasileira das plantas uteis. Parte 1: Culturas, inimigos, indústria. Chácaras e Quintais, 57, 129–202.Google Scholar
  39. Franco, G. (1987). Tabela de composição química dos alimentos. Rio de Janeiro: Livraria Atheneu.Google Scholar
  40. Franke, R. W. (1987). The effects of colonialism and neocolonialism on the gastronomic patters of the Third World. In M. Harris & E. B. Ross (Eds.), Food and evolution: Toward a theory of human food habits (pp. 455–79). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Futemma, C. R. T. (1995). Agriculture and caboclo household organization in the Lower Amazon Basin: Case studies. M.Sc Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Tulane.Google Scholar
  42. Gentil, J. (1988). A juta na agricultura de várzea da área de Santarém, Médio Amazonas. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi Nova Série Antropologia, 4, 118–205.Google Scholar
  43. Giugliano, R., Giugliano, L. G., & Shrimpton, R. (1981). Estudos nutricionais das populações rurais da Amazônia. 1 – Várzea do rio Solimões. Acta Amazonica, 11, 773–88.Google Scholar
  44. Giugliano, R., Shrimpton, R., Arkcoll, D. B., Giugliano, L. G., & Petrere Jr., M. (1978). Diagnóstico da realidade alimentar e nutricional do estado do Amazonas, 1978. Acta Amazônica, 8, 1–54.Google Scholar
  45. Giugliano, R., Shrimpton, R., Marinho, H. A., & Giugliano, L. G. (1984). Estudos nutricionais das populações rurais da Amazônia. II. Rio Negro. Acta Amazonica, 14, 427–49.Google Scholar
  46. Gravata, A. G. (1938). Manual da mandioca: A mais brasileira das plantas uteis. Quarta Parte: As industrias da mandioca. Chácaras e Quintais, 57, 352–60, 499–517, 631–48, 727–41, 892–902.Google Scholar
  47. Grenand, F. (1993). Bitter manioc in the lowlands of tropical America: From myth to commercialization. In: C. M. Hladick, A. Hladick, O. F. Linares, H. Pagezy, A. Semple, & M. Hadley (Eds.), Tropical forests, people and food: Biocultural interactions and applications to development (pp. 447–62). Paris: Unesco/Parthenon.Google Scholar
  48. Gross, D. (1975). Protein capture and cultural development in the Amazon Basin. American Anthropologist, 77, 526–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Grundmann, R., & Stehr, N. (2000). Social science and the absence of nature: Uncertainty and the reality of extremes. Social Science Information, 39, 155–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Harris, M. (1999). The Brazilian floodplains: Where cholera does not kill caboclos. In S. Day, E. Papataxiarches, & M. Stewart (Eds.), Lilies of the field. Marginal People who live for the moment. Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  51. Henry, G., & Hershey, C. (2002). Cassava in South America and the Caribbean. In: R. J. Hillocks, J. M. Tresh, & A. C. Bellotti (Eds.), Cassava: Biology, production and utilization (pp. 17–40). Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
  52. Hillocks, R. J., Thresh, J. M., & Bellotti, A. C. (Eds.). (2002). Cassava: Biology, production and utilization. Wallingford: CAB International Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. Holmes, R. (1983). Nutritional status and cultural change in Venezuela’s Amazon territory. In J. Hemming (Ed.), The frontier after a decade of colonisation (pp. 237–87). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Holmes, R., & Clark, K. (1992). Diet, acculturation and nutritional status in Venezuela’s Amazon territory. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 27, 163–87.Google Scholar
  55. IBGE. (1991) Censo demográfico. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (1991). Tabelas de composição de alimentos. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.Google Scholar
  56. IBGE. (1999) Censo demográfico. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (1999). Tabelas de composição de alimentos. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.Google Scholar
  57. INPA. (1998). Composição de alimentos da Amazônia. Manaus: Instituto de Pesquisas da Amazônia/Coordenação de Pesquisas em Ciências da Saúde (CPCS).Google Scholar
  58. Jackson, F. L. C. (1993). The influence of dietary cyanogenic glycosides from cassava on human metabolic biology and microevolution. In C. M. Hladik, A. Hladik, O. F. Linares, H. Pagezy, A. Semple, & M. Hadley (Eds.), Tropical forests, people and food: Biocultural interactions and applications to development (pp. 321–38). Paris: Unesco/Partenon.Google Scholar
  59. Lathrap, D. W. (1968). The ‘hunting’ economies of the tropical forest zone of South America: An attempt at an historical perspective. In R. B. Lee & J. Devore (Eds.), Man, the hunter (pp. 23–9). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  60. McGrath, D., Castro, F., Futemma, C. R., Amaral, B. D., & Calabria, J. A. (1993). Fisheries and the evolution of resource management on the Lower Amazon Varzea. Human Ecology, 21, 167–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McGrath, D. G., Clancy, C., & Murrieta, R. S. S. (1995). Demographic and economic census of Ituqui Island, Santarém, Pará, Brazil. Santarém: Projeto Várzea.Google Scholar
  62. McKey, D., & Beckerman, S. (1993). Chemical ecology, plant evolution and traditional manioc cultivation systems. In: C. M. Hladik, A. Hladik, O. F. Linares, H. Pagezy, A. Semple, & M. Hadley (Eds.), Tropical forests, people and food: Biocultural interactions and applications to development (pp. 83–112). Paris: Unesco/Partenon.Google Scholar
  63. Meggers, B. (1954). Environmental limitation on the development of culture. American Anthropologist, 56, 801–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Meggers, B. (1958). Ambiente y cultura en la Cuenca del Amazonas: Revision de la teoria del determinismo ambiental. In: Estudios sobre Ecologia Humana. Conferencias en la Sociedad de Antropologia de Washington.Google Scholar
  65. Meggers, B. (1987). Amazônia, a ilusão de um paraíso perdido. Belo Horizonte: Itatiaia/Edusp.Google Scholar
  66. Migliano, A. B. (2000). Amazônia: Interações ecológicas e estratégias adaptativas dos caboclos do Médio Solimões. MA dissertation, University of São Paulo.Google Scholar
  67. Moran, E. F. (1989). Models of native and folk adaptation in the Amazon. Advances in Economic Botany, 7, 22–9.Google Scholar
  68. Moran, E. F. (1993). Through Amazonian eyes. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
  69. Murrieta, R. S. S. (1994). Diet and subsistence: Changes in three caboclo populations on Marajó Island, Amazonia, Brazil. M.A Dissertation, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  70. Murrieta, R. S. S. (1998). O dilema do Papa-Chibé: Consumo alimentar, nutrição e práticas de intervenção na Ilha de Ituqui, Baixo Amazonas, Pará. Revista de Antropologia, 41, 97–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Murrieta, R. S. S. (2000). The dilemma of the ‘Chibé’-eater: Food choices, ecology and everyday life among peasant communities in the Lower Amazon, Brazil. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  72. Murrieta, R. S. S. (2001a). Dialética do sabor: Alimentação, ecologia e vida cotidiana em comunidades ribeirinhas da Ilha de Ituqui, Baixo Amazonas, Pará. Revista de Antropologia, 44, 39–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Murrieta, R. S. S. (2001b). A mística do Pirarucu: Pesca, ethos e paisagem em comunidades rurais do Baixo Amazonas. Horizontes Antropológicos, 7, 113–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Murrieta, R. S. S., & WinklerPrins, A. M. G. A. (2003). Flowers of water: Homegardens and gender roles in a riverine caboclo community in the Lower Amazon, Brazil. Culture & Agriculture, 25, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Murrieta, R. S. S., & Dufour, D. (2004). Fish and farinha: Protein and energy consumption in Amazonian rural communities on Ituqui Island, Brazil. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 43, 231–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Murrieta, R. S. S., Neves, W. A., & Dufour, D. (1998). Status nutricional infantil em três comunidades ribeirinhas da Ilha de Ituqui, Amazônia, Brasil. Bol. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi, série Antropologia, 14, 3–19.Google Scholar
  77. Murrieta, R. S. S., Dufour, D. L., & Siqueira, A. D. (1999). Food consumption and subsistence in three caboclo populations on Marajó Island, Amazonia, Brazil. Human Ecology, 27, 455–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Murrieta, R. S. S., Brondizio, E. S., Siqueira, A. D., & Moran, E. F. (1989). Estratégias de subsistência de uma população ribeirinha do Marajó-Açú, Ilha de Marajó, Brasil. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi Nova Série Antropologia 8, 147–63.Google Scholar
  79. Murrieta, R. S. S., Brondizio, E. S. S., Siqueira, A. D., & Moran, E. F. (1992). Estratégias de subsistência da comunidade de Praia Grande, Ilha de Marajó, Pará, Brasil. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi Nova Série Antropologia, 8, 185–201.Google Scholar
  80. Murrieta, R. S. S., Adams, C., Bakri, M., Strumpf, R., & Sousa, P. S. (2006). Caboclo household food intake in Two Amazonian ecosystems: A comparative analysis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 129, 135–136.Google Scholar
  81. Mussolini, G. (1980). Ensaios de antropologia indígena e caiçara. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
  82. Nardi Filho, F. (1939). Mandioca e mentira. Chácaras & Quintais, 59.Google Scholar
  83. Neves, E. G. (1998). Twenty years of Amazonian archaeology in Brazil (1977–1997). Antiquity, 72, 625–32.Google Scholar
  84. Neves, W. A. (1989). Teorias de determinismo ecológico na Amazônia: um caso de marginalidade da comunidade científica nacional. In W. A. Neves (Ed.), Biologia e ecologia humana na Amazônia: Avaliação e perspectiva (pp. 59–76). Belém: SCT/PR CNPq/Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi.Google Scholar
  85. Neves, W. A. (1992). Antropologia ecológica de populações ribeirinhas do Estuário do Amazonas: Subsistência e adaptação. Relatório Científico. São Paulo: Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi/Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
  86. Neves, W. A. (1996). Antropologia ecológica. um olhar materialista sobre as sociedades humanas. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
  87. Nugent, S. (1993). Amazonian caboclo society: An essay on invisibility and peasant economy. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  88. Odum, E. P. (2001) Fundamentos de ecologia. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.Google Scholar
  89. Philppi, S. T. (2002). Tabela de composição de alimentos: Suporte para decisão nutricional. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
  90. Pinton, F., & Emperaire, L. (2000). A farinha de mandioca, um elo dos sistemas extrativistas. In L. Emperaire (Ed.), O extrativismo na Amazônia Central (pp. 57–67). São Paulo: Unesp/Imprensa Oficial do Estado.Google Scholar
  91. Prudencio, Y. C., & Al-Hassan, R. (1994). The food security stabilization roles of cassava in Africa. Food Policy, 19, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Pucciarelli, H. M., Neves, W. A., Melcher, S. S., & Murrieta, R. S. S. (2005). Nutritional status and sexual dimorphism in three Amazonian caboclo communities. Antropologie, República Tcheca, XLIII, 25–37.Google Scholar
  93. Ribeiro, B. G. (1987). O índio na cultura brasileira: Pequena enciclopédia da cultura brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Unibrade/Unesco.Google Scholar
  94. Roosevelt, A. C. (1991) Determinismo ecológico na interpretação do desenvolvimento indígena da Amazônia. In W. A. Neves (Ed.), Origens, adaptações e diversidade biológica do homem nativo da Amazônia (pp. 103–41). Belém: Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi/CNPq.Google Scholar
  95. Roosevelt, A. C. (1994). Amazonian Indians from prehistory to present: Anthropological perspectives. Tucson/London: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  96. Ross, E. (1978a). The evolution of the Amazon peasantry. Journal of Latin American Studies, 10, 30–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Ross, E. (1978b). Food taboos, diet, and hunting strategy: The adaptation to animals in Amazon cultural ecology. Current Anthropology, 19, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Santos, R. (1980). História econômica da Amazônia. Belém: Sejup.Google Scholar
  99. Santos, R. V., & Coimbra Jr., C. E. A. (1994). Contato, mudanças socioeconomicas e a bioantropologia dos Tupi-Mondé da Amazônia brasileira. In R. V. Santos & C. E. A. Coimbra Jr. (Eds.), Saúde e povos indígenas (pp. 189–213). Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz.Google Scholar
  100. Santos, R. V., & Coimbra Jr., C. E. A. (1998). On the (un)natural history of the Tupi-Mondé Indians: Bioanthropology and change in the Brazilian Amazon. In A. H.Goodman & T. L. Leatherman (Eds.), Building a new biocultural synthesis (pp. 269–93). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  101. Sauer, C. O. (1987). As plantas cultivadas da América do Sul. In D. Ribeiro (Ed.), Suma etnológica brasileira (pp. 59–93). Petrópolis: Finep.Google Scholar
  102. Schmidt, C. B. (1958). A lavoura caiçara. Rio de Janeiro: Ministério da Agricultura, Serviço de Informação Agrária.Google Scholar
  103. Silva, H. P. (2001). Growth, development, nutrition and health in caboclo populations from the Brazilian Amazon. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  104. Silva, H. P., & Eckhardt, R. B. (1994). Westernization and blood pressure variation in four Amazonian populations. Collegium Anthropologicum, 18, 81–7.Google Scholar
  105. Silva, H. P., Crews, D. E., & Neves, W. A. (1995). Subsistence patterns and blood pressure variation in two rural caboclo communities of Marajó Island, Pará, Brazil. American Journal of Human Biology, 7, 535–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Silva, H. P., James, G. D., & Crews, D. E. (2006). Blood pressure, seasonal body fat, heart rate, and ecological differences in caboclo populations of the Brazilian Amazon. American Journal of Human Biology, 18, 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Silva, P. P. (2005). Farinha, feijão e carne-seca: um tripé culinário no Brasil colonial. São Paulo: Editora Senac.Google Scholar
  108. Siqueira, A. D. (1997). The ecology of food and nutrition: Patterns of land use and nutritional status among caboclo populations on Marajó Island, Pará, Brazil. Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  109. Siqueira, A. D., Brondizio, E. S., Murrieta, R. S. S., Silva, H. P., Neves, W. A., & Viertler, R. B. (1993). Estratégias de subsistência da população ribeirinha do Igarapé do Paricatuba, Ilha do Marajó, Brasil. Bol. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi, série Antropologia, 9, 153–70.Google Scholar
  110. Spath, C. D. (1981). Getting to the meat of the problem: Some comments on protein as a limiting factor in Amazonia. American Anthropologist, 83, 377–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Steward, J. H. (1949). South American cultures: An interpretative summary. In: J. H. Steward (Ed.), Handbook of South American Indians. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  112. UNICAMP. (2004). Tabela brasileira de composição de alimentos. Campinas: Unicamp/NEPA.Google Scholar
  113. Vaughan, B. (1939). Rendimentos culturais da mandioca. Chácaras & Quintais, 60, 742–3.Google Scholar
  114. Weinstein, B. (1985). Persistence of caboclo culture in the Amazon: The impact of the rubber trade, 1850–1920. In E. P. Parker (Ed.), The Amazon caboclo: Historical and contemporary perspectives (pp. 89–113). Williamsburg: College of William and Mary.Google Scholar
  115. WinklerPrins, A. M. G. A. (1999). Between the floods: Soils and agriculture on the Lower Amazon Floodplain, Brazil. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  116. WinklerPrins, A. M. G. A. (2001). Why context matters: Local soil knowledge and management among an indigenous peasantry on the Lower Amazon floodplain, Brazil. Etnoecológica, 5, 6–20.Google Scholar
  117. WinklerPrins, A. M. G. A. (2002). Recent seasonal flooplain-upland migration along the Lower Amazon river. The Geographical Review, 92, 415–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. WinklerPrins, A. M. G. A., & McGrath, D. G. (2000). Smallholder agriculture along the Lower Amazon floodplain, Brazil. PLEC News and Viwes, 16, 34–42.Google Scholar
  119. Zeron, A. C. (Ed.). (2000). Equipamentos, usos e costumes da casa brasileira: Alimentação. São Paulo: Museu da Casa Brasileira.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristina Adams
    • 1
  • Rui Murrieta
    • 1
  • Andrea Siqueira
    • 1
  • Walter Neves
    • 1
  • Rosely Sanches
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ArtsSciences and Humanities at the University of São PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations