Ringed Seals in the Gulf of Bothnia

Chapter

Abstract

The Baltic Sea harbours a tiny but increasing remnant of a formerly huge population of ringed seals that are adapted to the brackish waters there. These seals are of much concern. The population is small, red-listed and protected according to national and international regulations. We also use seals as environmental indicators. Furthermore, we should manage the seal population to avoid damage to fisheries.

Until now, we have counted ringed seals and looked at their health status. However, looking at population size and health status only is not enough. For practical management to work, we even have to look at fisheries and how these are affected by seals. We have to learn much more about the biology and ecology of the species. We also have to acknowledge the fact that Finland and Sweden share a common population.

Today, we lack concrete and measurable objectives for ringed seals in the Gulf of Bothnia regarding population increase, population size, and distribution, regarding the frequency and extent of damages that are tolerable to coastal fisheries, regarding the maximum number of by-catches, and regarding possible future hunting quota.

To acquire the information needed for informed management, we have to continue with what we already do (annual aerial surveys of population size, surveys of health status). We also have to further develop ongoing activities (better routines for reporting of survey results, regular and structured surveys of damage to fisheries and of seal mortality, intensified ecological research). Furthermore, we have to start up several new activities, such as viability analyses, attitude surveys and forums for management planning at the regional and the international scale.

Keywords

Ringed seal environmental indicators population size health status viability analyses attitude surveys 

References

  1. Bergman A, Bergstrand A, Bignert A (2001) Renal lesions in Baltic grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) and ringed seals (Phoca hispida botnica). Ambio 30:397–409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Carlberg T, Lundquist T (2008) EU-förslag kan krångla till svensk skyddsjakt på säl. Fauna & Flora 103/3:16–18 (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  3. Gärdenfors U (ed) (2005) Rödlistade arter i Sverige 2005. The 2005 Red list of Swedish species. ArtDatabanken, SLU, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  4. Harding KC, Härkönen TJ (1999) Development in the Baltic grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) and ringed seal (Phoca hispida) populations during the 20th century. Ambio 28:619–627Google Scholar
  5. Härkönen T (2006) Phoca hispida botnica, vikare. ArtDatabanken, SLU (in Swedish), Faktablad, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  6. Härkönen T, Heide-Jørgensen M-P (1990) Density and distribution of the ringed seal in the Bothnian Bay. Holarctic Ecol 13:122–129Google Scholar
  7. Härkönen T, Lunneryd SG (1992) Estimating abundance of ringed seals in the Bothnian Bay. Ambio 21:497–510Google Scholar
  8. Härkönen T, Stenman O, Jüssi M, Jüssi I, Sagitov R, Verevkin M (1998) Population size and distribution of the Baltic ringed seal (Phoca hispida botnica). In: Heide-Jørgensen MP, Lydersen C (eds) Ringed seals (Phoca hispida) in the North Atlantic, vol 1. NAMMCO Scientific Publications, Tromsø pp 167–180Google Scholar
  9. HELCOM (2006) Recommendations on the conservation of seals in the Baltic Sea area. Available at: www-helcom.fi/Recommendations/en_GB/rec27-28_2/ (accessed on 1 Dec 2008)Google Scholar
  10. HELCOM (2007) Climate change in the Baltic Sea area – HELCOM thematic assessment in 2007. Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No. 111Google Scholar
  11. Helle E (1980) Aerial census of ringed seals Pusa hispida basking on the ice of the Bothnian Bay, Baltic. Holarctic Ecol 3:183–189Google Scholar
  12. Hemmingsson M, Lunneryd S-G (2006) Inventering av sälskadesituationen i Västerbottens och Norrbottens län. Report from the Swedish Board of Fisheries, 2006-01-04 (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  13. Jord- och skogsbruksministeriet (2007) Förvaltningsplan för Östersjöns sälstammar. Jord- och skogsbruksministeriet, rapport 4a/2007 (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  14. Karlsson O, Härkönen T, Bäcklin B-M (2007) Sälar på uppgång. Havet 2007:84–89 (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  15. Kvarkenrådet (2008) Sälen vår gemensamma resurs. Slutrapport. Report from Kvarkenrådet (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  16. Lunneryd S-G, Königson S, Sjöberg NB (2004) Bifångst av säl, tumlare och fåglar i det svenska yrkesfisket. Finfo 2004:8, Fiskeriverket, Göteborg (in Swedish with English summary)Google Scholar
  17. Mattson M, Helle E (1995) Reproductive recovery and PCBs in Baltic seal populations. Eleventh biennial conference on the biology of marine mammals. 14–18 Dec 1995, Orlando USA, p 74Google Scholar
  18. Reeves RR (1998) Distribution, abundance, and biology of ringed seal (Phoca hispida): An overview. In: Heide-Jørgensen MP, Lydersen C (eds) Ringed seals (Phoca hispida) in the North Atlantic, vol 1. NAMMCO Scientific Publications, Tromsø pp 9–45Google Scholar
  19. Salomonson A, Katajista J, Sedin A (2006) Coastal lagoons in Sweden and Finland. In: Hurford C, Schneider M (eds) Monitoring nature conservation in cultural habitats. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 361–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmölcke U (2008) Holocene environmental changes and the seal (Phocidae) fauna of the Baltic Sea. Coming, going and staying. Mammal Rev 38:231–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schneider M (2006) Monitoring the Brown Bear Ursus arctos in Västerbotten County. In: Hurford C, Schneider M (eds) Monitoring nature conservation in cultural habitats. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 195–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schneider M, Härkönen T, Hemmingsson M, Karlsson M, (2009) Åtgärdsprogram för förvaltning av vikare Phoca hispida botnica. Unpublished manuscript (in Swedish with English summary)Google Scholar
  23. SMHI (2008) Genomsnittlig isutbredning. Available at: www.smhi.se/oceanografi/istjanst/isutbredning.pdf (accessed on 30 November 2008) (in Swedish)
  24. Storm A, Routti H, Nyman M, Kunnasranta M (2007) På tal om säl – regionala och nationella synpunkter och förväntningar på förvaltningen av sälstammen. Kala- ja riistaraportteja 396B (in Swedish)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.County Administration, Västerbotten CountyUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations