Connectivity and Transformation in Work-Related Learning – Theoretical Foundations

  • Päivi Tynjälä


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, J.R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Appelbaum, S. H., & Reichart, W. R. (1998). How to measure an organization’s learning ability: The facilitating factors – Part \ref{ptII:ptII}. Journal of Workplace Learning 1,15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  4. Beach, K. (2003). Consequential transitions: a developmental view of knowledge propagation through social organizations. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engestöm (Eds), Between school and work. New perspectives on transfer and boundary crossing (pp. 39–61). Amsterdam: {Pergamon.}Google Scholar
  5. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  7. Billett, S. (2004). Learning through work: Workplace participatory practices. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 109–125). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Billett, S., & Seddon, T (2004) Building community through social partnerships around vocational education and training, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 56(1), 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bologna process (2007). The Bologna Process. Towards the European higher education area. Retrieved September 17, 2007, from
  10. Boreham, N. 2002. Work process knowledge in technological and organizational development. In N. Boreham, R. Samurcay & M. Fischer (Eds.), Work process knowledge (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Boreham, N., Samucay, R., & Fischer, M. (Eds.). (2002). Work process knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Copenhagen Decraration (2002). Enhanced European cooperation in vocational education and training – the “Bruges-Copenhagen process”. Retrieved September 17, 2007, from Scholar
  14. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine. The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki-Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
  16. Engeström, Y. (2000). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity-theoretical reconceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Engeström, Y. (2004). The new generation of expertise. Seven theses. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 145–165). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction 5(4), 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. EQF (2007). The European qualifications framework: A new way to understand qualifications across Europe. Retrieved September 17, 2007 from education/policies/educ/eqf/index_en.htmlGoogle Scholar
  20. Eraut, M. (2004a). Transfer of knowledge between education and workplace settings. In H. {Rainbird}, A. Fuller & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 201–221). {London:} Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Eraut, M. (2004b). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eyler, J., & Giles, D.E. Jr. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2002). Developing pedagogies for the contemporary workplace. In K. Evans, P. Hodkinson & L. Unwin (Eds.), Working to learn (pp. 95–111). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  24. Griffiths, T., & Guile, D. (2003). A connective model of learning: The implications for work process knowledge. European Educational Research Journal, 2(1), 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guile, D., & Griffiths, T. (2001). Learning through work experience. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 113–131.Google Scholar
  26. Hager, P. (2004). The conceptualization and measurement of learning at work. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 242–258). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S., & Lehtinen, E. (2004).Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  28. Kauppi, A. 2004. Työ muuttuu – muuttuuko oppiminen? (Work changes – does learning change?). In P. Tynjälä, J. Välimaa, & M. Murtonen (Eds.), Korkeakoulutus, oppiminen ja työelämä (pp. 187–212). Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.Google Scholar
  29. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Le Maistre, C., & Parè, A. (2006). A typology of knowledge demonstrated by beginning professionals. In P. Tynjälä, J. Välimaa, & G. Boulton-Lewis (Eds.), Higher education and work: Collaborations, confrontations and challenges (pp. 103–113). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  32. Leinhardt, G., McCarthy Young, K., & Merriman, J. (1995). Intergrating professional knowledge: The theory of practice and the practice of theory. Learning and Instruction, 5, 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lähteenmäki, S., Toivonen, J., & Mattila, M. (2001). Critical aspects of organizational learning research and proposals for its measurement. British Journal of Management, 12, 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  35. Ministry of Education (2007). Development plan for education and research. Retrieved September 17, 2007, from liitteet/opm_190_opm08.pdf?lang$=$enGoogle Scholar
  36. Nikkanen, P. (1998). Learning organisation, organisational learning and human resource management. In W.Th.J.G. Hoeben (Ed.), Effective school improvement: State of the Art. Contribution to a discussion (pp. 95–118). CT 97/2027. University of Groningen, Institute for Educational Research. The Netherlands: GION.Google Scholar
  37. Nikkanen, P. (2001). Effectiveness and improvement in a learning organization. In E. Kimonen (Ed.), Curriculum approaches (pp. 55–76). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, Department of Education & Institute for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  38. Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of “ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54.Google Scholar
  39. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three etaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pedler, M., Boydell, T., & Burgoyne, J. (1991). The learning company (2nd ed.). London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  42. Reich, R. B. (1991). The work of nations. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  43. Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  44. Sambrook, S., & Stewart, J. (1999, September). Influencing factors on lifelong learning and HRD practices: Comparison of seven European countries. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, Lahti, Finland.Google Scholar
  45. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday Currency.Google Scholar
  46. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27, 4–13.Google Scholar
  47. Slotte, V., & Tynjälä, P. (2003). Industry-university collaboration for continuing professional development. Journal of Education and Work, 16(4), 445–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stenström, M.-L. (2006). Polytechnic graduates working life skills and expertise. In P. Tynjälä, J. Välimaa & G. Boulton-Lewis (Eds.), Higher education and working life: Collaborations, confrontations and challenges (pp. 89–102). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  49. Sveiby, K.-S., & Simons, R. (2002). Collaborative climate and effectiveness of knowledge work – an empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(5), 420–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tutscher, R., & P. Grollman (2006). Practice-oriented assessment and quality assurance in VET in the geriatric sector in Germany. In M-L. Stenström & K. Laine (Eds), Quality and practice in assessment. New appraoches in work-related learning (pp. 67–88). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, Institute for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  51. Tynjälä, P., Slotte, V., Nieminen, J., Lonka, K., & Olkinuora, E. (2006). From university to working life: Graduates’ workplace skills in practice. In P. Tynjälä, J. Välimaa, & G. Boulton-Lewis (Eds.), Higher education and working life: Collaborations, confrontations and challenges (pp. 73–88). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  52. Tynjälä, P., Virtanen, A., & Valkonen, S. (2005). Työssäoppiminen Keski-Suomessa. Taitava Keski-Suomi -tutkimus osa I [Students’ workplace learning in Central Finland. “Skilled Central Finland” research report. Part \ref{ptI:ptI}]. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. Institute for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  53. Tynjälä, P., Välimaa, J., & Sarja, A. (2003). Pedagogical perspectives into the relationship between higher education and working life. Higher Education, 46, 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: {Cambridge} University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Vesalainen, J., & Strömmer, R. (1999). From individual learning to network learning – networks as learners and as forums for learning. In T. Alasoini & P. Halme (Eds.), Learning organizations, learning society. National workplace development programme yearbook 1999 (pp. 117–139). Helsinki: Ministry of Labour.Google Scholar
  56. Virolainen, M. (2004). Työhön sopeutumisesta oppimisen tilanteiden luomiseen. Ammattikorkeakoulujen työelämäjaksot ja työstä oppimisen mallit [From adaptation to work towards developing learning situations at work. Workplace learning and its models at polytechnics]. In P. Tynjälä, J. Välimaa, & M. Murtonen (Eds.), Korkeakoulutus, oppiminen ja työelämä. Pedagogisia ja yhteiskuntatieteellisiä näkökulmia (pp. 213–233). Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.Google Scholar
  57. Virolainen, M. (2007). Workplace learning and higher education in Finland: Reflections on current practice. Education + Training, 49(4), 290–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Virtanen, A., & Tynjälä, P. (2008). Students’ experiences of workplace learning in Finnish VET. European Journal of Vocational Training 2008/2(44), 199–213.Google Scholar
  59. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modelling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Välimaa, J. (2006). Analysing the relationship between higher education institutions and working life in a Nordic context. In P. Tynjälä, J. Välimaa, & G. Boulton-Lewis (Eds.), Higher education and working life. Collaborations, confrontations and challenges (pp. 35–53). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  62. Young, M. (1998). Curriculum of the future. From the new sociology of education to a critical theory of learning. London: Falmer press.Google Scholar
  63. Young, M. (1999). Knowledge, learning, and the curriculum of the future. British Educational Research Journal, 25, 463–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zamorski, B. (2006). Bringing industry and academia closer together: The introduction of the foundation degree in the UK. In P. Tynjälä, J. Välimaa, & G. Boulton-Lewis (Eds.), Higher education and working life: Collaborations, confrontations and challenges (pp. 57–72). {Amsterdam:} Elsevier.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Päivi Tynjälä
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Educational ResearchUniversity of JyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations