Postharvest Pathology pp 171-181

Part of the Plant Pathology in the 21st Century book series (ICPP, volume 2) | Cite as

Host Responses to Biological Control Agents

Chapter

Abstract

Host responses in stored fruits induced by biocontrol agents (BCAs) i.e. by non-pathogenic yeasts and bacteria, share many features with the defence mechanisms that are induced in actively growing plant tissues. The perception of a microorganism is accompanied by the production and activation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), antioxidant enzymes, phytoalexins, phenylalanine ammonia lyase and enzymes that degrade fungal cell walls. The responses of harvested fruit to BCAs do not fit with the existing division of induced resistance pathways into Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR) and rhizobacteria-mediated Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR), nor are the roles of salicylic or jasmonic acid clear. These responses seem to carry elements of both pathways. Moreover, successful BCAs need to be able to resist environments rich in toxic ROS; hydrogen peroxide being the dominant species, generated both during the induction of resistance (as in the defence of citrus fruit against Penicillium digitatum) and during the attack of some necrotrophic pathogens (as in the case of Penicillium expansum invading apples). Application of BCAs to fruits can result in increased production of antioxidant enzymes (by either organism), which protect living cells from the potential damage of ROS. Induction of resistance has usually not been considered an important mechanism in the activity of postharvest biocontrol agents. A deeper understanding of fruit responses that BCAs provoke of the infection process by necrotrophic pathogens during postharvest and of the accompanying host responses is needed. In the following chapter, we present examples from diverse plant-pathogen-BCA systems and suggest approaches for future research.

Keywords

Biological control induced resistance pathogenicity strategies of postharvest pathogenic fungi. 

References

  1. Alvarez ME, Pennell RI, Meijer PJ, Ishikawa A, Dixon RA, Lamb C (1998) Reactive oxygen intermediates mediate a systemic signal network in the establishment of plant immunity. Cell 92:773-784CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arras G (1996) Mode of action of an isolate of Candida famata in biological control of Penicillium digitatum in orange fruits. Postharvest Biol Technol 8:191-198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Castoria R, De Curtis F, Lima G, De Cicco V (1997) β-1, 3-glucanase activity of two saprophytic yeasts and possible mode of action as biocontrol agents against postharvest diseases. Postharvest Biol Technol 12:293-300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castoria R, De Curtis F, Lima G, Caputo L, Pacifico S, De Cicco V (2001) Aureobasidium pullulans (LS-30) an antagonist of postharvest pathogens of fruits: study on its modes of action. Postharvest Biol Technol 22:7-17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castoria R, Caputo L, De Curtis F, De Cicco V (2003) Resistance of postharvest biocontrol yeasts to oxidative stress: a possible new mechanism of action. Phytopathology 93:564-572CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chan Z, Tian S (2006) Induction of H2O2-metabolizing enzymes and total protein synthesis by antagonistic yeast and salicylic acid in harvested sweet cherry fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 39:314-320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan Z, Qin G, Xu X, Li B, Tian S (2007) Proteome approach to characterize proteins induced by antagonist yeast and salicylic acid in peach fruit. J Proteome Res 6:1677-1688CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. De Vos M, Van Oosten VR, Van Poecke RMP, Van Pelt JA, Pozo MJ, Mueller MJ, Buchala AJ, Métraux JP, Van Loon LC, Dicke M, Pieterse CMJ (2005) Signal signature and transcriptome changes of Arabidopsis during pathogen and insect attack. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 18:923-937CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Droby S, Chalutz E (1994) Mode of action of biocontrol agents of postharvest diseases. In: Wilson CL, Wisniewski ME (eds) Biological control of postharvest diseases - theory and practice. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 63-75Google Scholar
  10. Droby S, Vinokur V, Weiss B, Cohen L, Daus A, Goldschmidt EE, Porat R (2002) Induction of Resistance to Penicillium digitatum in Grapefruit by the Yeast Biocontrol Agent Candida oleophila. Phytopathology 92:393-399CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Durrant WE, Dong X (2004) Systemic Acquired Resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 42:185-209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. El Ghaouth A, Wilson CL, Wisniewski M (2003) Control of postharvest decay of apple fruit with Candida saitoana. Phytopatology 93:344-348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fravel DR (2005) Commercialization and Implementation of Biocontrol. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43:337-359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Giobbe S, Marceddu S, Scherm B, Zara G, Mazzarello VL, Budroni M, Migheli Q (2007) The strange case of a biofilm-forming strain of Pichia fermentans, which controls Monilinia brown rot of apple but is pathogenic on peach fruit. FEMS Yeast Res 7:1389-1398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Glazebrook J (2005) Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43:205-227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hadas Y, Goldberg I, Pines O, Prusky D (2007) Involvement of gluconic acid and glucose oxidase in the pathogenicity of Penicillium expansum in apples. Phytopathology 97:384-390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I, Lorito M (2004) Trichoderma species — opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:43-56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ippolito A, El Ghaouth A, Wilson CL, Wisnievski M (2000) Control of postharvest decay of apple fruit by Aureobasidium pullulans and induction of defennse responses. Postharvest Biol Technol 19:265-272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Janisiewicz WJ, Korsten L (2002) Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40:411-441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Karni L, Prusky D, Kobiler I, Bar-Shira E, Kobiler D (1989) Involvement of epicatechin in the regulation of lipoxygenase activity during activation of quiescent Colletotrichum gloeosporioides infections of ripening avocado fruits. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 35:367-374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kessler A, Baldwin IT (2002) Plant responses to insect herbivory: the emerging molecular analysis. Ann Rev Plant Biol 53:299-328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim KS, Min J-Y, Dickman MB (2008) Oxalic acid is an elicitor of plant programmed cell death during Sclerotinia sclerotiorum disease development. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 21:605-612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Macarisin D, Cohen L, Eick A, Rafael G, Belausov E, Wisnievski M, Droby S (2007) Penicillium digitatum suppresses production of hydrogen peroxide in host tissue during infection of citrus fruit. Phytopathology 97:1491-1500CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Raacke IC, von Rad U, Mueller MJ, Berger S (2006) Yeast increases resistance in Arabidopsis against Pseudomonas syringae and Botrytis cinerea by salicylic acid-dependent as well as independent mechanisms. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 19:1138-1146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Terry LA, Joyce DC (2004) Elicitors of induced disease resistance in postharvest horticultural crops: a brief review. Postharvest Biol Technol 32:1-13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tian S, Yao H, Deng X, Xu X, Qin G, Chan Z (2007) Characterization and expression of b-1,3-glucanase genes in Jujube fruit induced by the microbial biocontrol agent Cryptococcus ­laurentii. Phytopathology 97:260-268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Torres R, Valentines MC, Usall J, Vinas I, Larrigaudiere C (2003) Possible involvement of hydrogen peroxide in the development of resistance mechanisms in ‘Golden Delicious’ apple fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 27:235-242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vallad GE, Goodman RM (2004) Systemic acquired resistance and induced systemic resistance in conventional agriculture. Crop Sci 44:1920-1934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van Kan JAL (2006b) Licensed to kill: the lifestyle of a necrotrophic plant pathogen. Trends Plant Sci 11:247-253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Williamson B, Tudzynski B, Tudzynski P, Van Kan JAL (2007) Botrytis cinerea: the cause of grey mould disease. Mol Plant Pathol 8:561-580CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wisniewski M, Biles C, Droby S, McLaughlin R, Wilson C, Chalutz E (1991) Mode of action of the postharvest biocontrol yeast. Pichia guilliermondii. I. Characterization of attachment to Botrytis cinerea. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 39:245-258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xu X, Qin G, Tian S (2008) Effect of microbial biocontrol agents on alleviating oxidative damage of peach fruit subjected to fungal pathogen. Int J Food Microbiol 126:153-158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Yao H, Tian S (2005) Effects of pre- and postharvest application of salicylic acid or methyl jasmonate on inducing disease resistance of sweet cherry fruit in storage. Postharvest Biol Technol 35:253-262CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Vegetali e dell’AmbienteUniversità del MoliseCampobassoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Plant and Environmental SciencesUniversity of GothenburgGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations