Implementing Material Flow Cost Accounting in a Pharmaceutical Company

  • Yasushi Onishi
  • Katsuhiko Kokubu
  • Michiyasu Nakajima
Part of the Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science book series (ECOE, volume 24)

Abstract

In Japan, several dozen companies are now attempting to introduce material flow cost accounting (MFCA) through a project initiated by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) and others. Nevertheless, the majority of companies that have introduced MFCA have used it in only a single project for the purpose of cost study and few companies use it continually to conduct improvement activities. In this paper, we present the case of Tanabe Seiyaku Co. Ltd., which has succeeded in the implementation and organisation-wide deployment of MFCA, in order to analyse the primary factors leading to the use of MFCA in continual waste reduction. Our results demonstrate that MFCA data is reflected in the departmental and employee performance evaluation at Tanabe Seiyaku as part of its management control systems and this mechanism is the key to the continual use of MFCA within the company.

Keywords

Environmental Management System Cost Accounting Management Control System Balance Scorecard Enterprise Resource Planning System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Ammenberg, J., & Sundin, E. (2005). Products in environmental management systems: drivers, barriers, and experiences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 405–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, S. W. (1995). A Framework for Assessing Cost Management System Changes: The Case of Activity Based Costing Implementation at General Motors, 1986–1993. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 7(Fall), 1–50.Google Scholar
  3. Anjo, Y. (2003). Environmental management and material flow cost accounting. Environmental Management, 39(7), 19–25 (available only in Japanese).Google Scholar
  4. Anthony, R. N. (1965). Planning and control systems: A framework for analysis. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  5. Bailey, P. E. (1991). Full cost accounting for life cycle costs—A guide for engineers and financial analysts. Environmental Finance, Spring 13–29.Google Scholar
  6. Bouma, J. J., van der Veen, M. (2002). Wanted: A theory for environmental management accounting. In M. Bennett, J. J. Bouma, & T. Wolters (Eds.), Environmental management accounting: Informational and institutional developments (pp. 279–290). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  7. Burritt, R. (2004). Environmental management accounting: roadblocks on the way to the green and pleasant land. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13, 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burritt, R. L., Hahn, T., & Schaltegger, S. (2003). Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental management accounting—Links between business actors and environmental management accounting tools. New York: International Federation of Accountants.Google Scholar
  9. Burritt, R., & Saka, C. (2006). Environmental management accounting applications and eco-efficiency: Case studies from Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 1262–1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epstein, M. J. (1996). Measuring corporate environmental performance: Best practice for costing and managing an effective environmental strategy. Chicago: Irwin Professional.Google Scholar
  11. Epstein, M. J., & Wisner, P. S. (2001). Using a balanced scorecard to implement sustainability. Environmental Quality Management, Winter, 1–10.Google Scholar
  12. Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2003). The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework to link environmental management accounting with strategic management. In M. Bennett, P. Rikhardsson, & S. Schaltegger (Eds.), Environmental management accounting—Purpose and progress (pp. 19–40). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  13. Gale, R. (2006). Environmental management accounting as a reflexive modernization strategy in cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 1228–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IFAC (International Federation of Accountants) (2005). International guideline document—Environmental management accounting, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Japan Management Association Consulting (2005). The model project of joint research in material flow cost accounting for large enterprises (available only in Japanese).Google Scholar
  16. JEMAI (Japan Environmental Management Association for Industry) (2004). The research project for energy efficiency, environmental management system, and environmental accounting (available only in Japanese).Google Scholar
  17. Kawano Y (2003). Challenges for cost reduction and environmental protection using material flow cost accounting. Environmental Management, 39(7), 19–25 (available only in Japanese).Google Scholar
  18. Kokubu, K., & Nakajima, M. (2004a). Material flow cost accounting in Japan: A new trend of environmental management accounting practices. Conference paper of 4th Asia-Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting.Google Scholar
  19. Kokubu, K., & Nakajima, M. (2004b). Sustainable accounting initiatives in Japan: Pilot projects of material flow cost accounting. In J. -D. Seiler-Hausmann, C. Liedtke, & E. U. von Weizsäcker (Eds.), Eco-efficiency and beyond: Towards the sustainable enterprise (pp. 100–112). Sheffield: Greenleaf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kokubu, K., Nashioka, E., Saio, K., & Imai, S. (2003). Two governmental initiatives on environmental management accounting and corporate practice. In M. Bennett, P. M. Rikhardsson, & S. Schaltegger (Eds.), Environmental management accounting—Purpose and progress (pp. 89–113). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kreuze, J. G., & Newell, G. E. (1994). ABC and life-cycle costing for environmental expenditures. Management Accounting, February, 38–42.Google Scholar
  22. Lang, C., Heubach, D., & Loew, T. (2005). Using software systems to support environmental accounting instruments. In P. M. Rikhardsson, M. Bennett, J. J. Bouma, & S. Schaltegger (Eds.), Implementing environmental management accounting: Status and challenges (pp. 143–168). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Loew, T. (2003). Environmental cost accounting: Classifying and comparing selected approaches. In M. Bennett, P. M. Rikhardsson, & S. Schaltegger (Eds.), Environmental management accounting—Purpose and progress (pp. 41–56). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. METI (Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) (2002). Handbook of environmental management accounting.Google Scholar
  25. Milne, M. J. (1996). On sustainability, the environment and management accounting. Management Accounting Research, 7, 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MOE (Japan Ministry of the Environment) (2005). FY 2004 survey of environment-friendly corporate activities (available only in Japanese).Google Scholar
  27. Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10, 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pojasek, R. B. (1997). Understanding a process with process mapping. Pollution Prevention Review, Summer, 91–101.Google Scholar
  29. Pojasek, R. B., & Cali, L. J. (1991). Contrasting approaches to pollution prevention auditing. Pollution Prevention Review, Summer, 225–235.Google Scholar
  30. Rooney, C. (1993). Economics of pollution prevention: How waste reduction pays. Pollution Prevention Review, Summer, 261–276.Google Scholar
  31. Savage, D. (2003). The what and how of environmental management accounting (EMA): Materials and energy flows. Business and the Environment, 14(8), 3–5.Google Scholar
  32. Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., & Burritt, R. (Eds.) (2006). Sustainability accounting and reporting. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Scheide, W., Enzler, S., & Dold, G. (2002). Efficient eco-management using eco-Integral: How to save costs and natural resources at the same time. In M. Bennett, J. J. Bouma, & T. Wolters, Environmental management accounting: Informational and institutional developments (pp. 93–111). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  34. Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  35. Strobel, M., & Redmann, C. (2001). Flow cost accounting—Cutting costs and relieving stress on the environment by means of an accounting approach based on the actual flows of materials. Augsburg: Institut für Management und Umwelt.Google Scholar
  36. Strobel, M., & Redmann, C. (2002). Flow cost accounting, an accounting approach based on the actual flows of materials. In M. Bennett, J. J. Bouma, & T. Wolters. Environmental management accounting: Informational and institutional developments (pp. 67–82). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  37. UNDSD (United Nations Division for Sustainable Development) (2001). Environmental management accounting procedures and Principles.Google Scholar
  38. USEPA (1992). Total cost assessment: Accelerating industrial pollution prevention through innovative project financial analysis with applications to the pulp and paper industry. EPA741-R-92-002.Google Scholar
  39. USEPA (1996). Full cost accounting for decision making at Ontario Hydro: A case study. EPA742-R-95-004.Google Scholar
  40. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1988). Waste minimization opportunity assessment manual. EPA625-7-88-003.Google Scholar
  41. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2000). The lean and green supply chain: A practical guide for materials managers and supply chain managers to reduce costs and improve environmental performance. EPA 742-R-00-001.Google Scholar
  42. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2001). An organisational guide to pollution prevention. EPA 625-R-01-003.Google Scholar
  43. Wagner, B., & Enzler, S. (2005). Material flow management: Improving cost efficiency and environmental performance. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yasushi Onishi
    • 1
  • Katsuhiko Kokubu
    • 2
  • Michiyasu Nakajima
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Business AdministrationTezukayama UniversityTezukayamaJapan
  2. 2.Kobe UniversityKobeJapan
  3. 3.Kansai UniversitySuitaJapan

Personalised recommendations