Cosmic Life Forms

Part of the Cellular Origin, Life in Extreme Habitats and Astrobiology book series (COLE, volume 12)

Abstract

We propose that the first principle of biology is a useful guide in exploring cosmic life forms. Moreover, it determines the basic prerequisites of life in material-independent form. Starting from the Bauer principle (BP), we made explicit its content, and found that the Bauer principle is mediated by virtual interaction (VI) which generates biological couplings (BC) opening up an enormous realm of biologically spontaneous reactions. With the help of biological couplings, it becomes possible that the organism self-initiate systematic investment of work ΔW against the equilibrium, which would otherwise necessarily be approached on the basis of the given initial state and the laws of physics. Therefore, the essence of life can be formulated as the following: the Bauer principle (BP) is manifest in virtual interactions which generate biological couplings leading to investment of work ΔW that generates thermodynamically uphill processes increasing extropy п (Δп > 0); compactly, BP→VI→BC→ ΔW→Δп. We point out that generation of lawful algorithmic complexity is a fundamental characteristic of life (Grandpierre, 2008). Applying the Bauer principle for the Sun, we found that the Sun is a living organism. We are led to recognize a cosmic life form in stellar activity cycles. Then we generalized the Bauer principle and found new kinds of cosmic life forms like the microscopic, intermittent and hidden life forms. We found that the first principle of biology is able to be manifest in the whole universe through virtual interactions. This result led us to recognize a newcosmic life form present in the vacuum that we call universal life.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bauer, E. 1935/1967, Theoretical Biology (1935, 1993 and 2002: in Russian; 1967: in Hungarian) Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, p. 51.Google Scholar
  2. Ben Jacob, E., Shapira, Y. and Tauber, A. I. 2006, Seeking the Foundations of Cognition in Bacteria: From Schrödinger’s Negative Entropy to Latent Information. Physica A 359, 495–524.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Callen, H. B. 1960, Thermodynamics. Wiley, New York, p. 7.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Consolini, G., Berrilli, F., Florio, A., Pietropaolo, E., Smaldone, L. A. 2003, Information Entropy in Solar Atmospheric Fields. I. Intensity Photospheric Structures. Astronomy and Astrophysics 402, 1115–1127.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Crofts, A. R. 2007, Life, Information, Entropy, and Time. Complexity 13, 14–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahlbom, M., Beenken, W., Sundström, V. and Pullerits, T. 2002, Collective Excitation Dynamics and Polaron Formation in Molecular Aggregates. Chemical Physics Letters 364, 556–561.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies, P. 2006, The Goldilocks Enigma. Why Is the Universe Just Right for Life? Allen Lane, Penguin, London.Google Scholar
  8. Dick, S. J. and Strick, J. E. 2004, The Living Universe. NASA and the Development of Astrobiology. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  9. Editorial, 2007, The Meaning of ‘Life’. Nature 447, 1031–1032 (28 June 2007) doi:10.1038/4471031b; Published online 27 June 2007.Google Scholar
  10. Feynman, R. P. 1985, QED. The Strange Theory of Light and Matter. Penguin, London, pp. 84–85.Google Scholar
  11. Feynman, R. P. and Hibbs, A. R. 1965, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals, McGraw-Hill, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Gell-Mann, M. 1995, Nature Comfortable to Herself. Complexity 1, 1126.Google Scholar
  13. Grandpierre, A. 1996, A Pulsating-Ejecting Solar Core Model and the Solar Neutrino Problem. Astronomy and Astrophysics 308, 199–214.ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Grandpierre, A. 1997, The Sun as an Extremely Sensitively Interconnected and Regulated System. In: Chronobiology and Its Roots in the Cosmos, ed. M. Mikulecky. 3rd International Workshop, Slovakia, pp. 145–153.Google Scholar
  15. Grandpierre, A. 1999, A Dynamic Solar Core Model: On the Activity Related Changes of the Neutrino Fluxes. Astronomy and Astrophysics 348, 993–999.ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Grandpierre, A. 2004, Conceptual Steps Towards Exploring the Fundamental Nature of the Sun. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 2(1), 12–28, http://indecs.znanost.org/2004/indecs2004-ppl 2–28.pdf Google Scholar
  17. Grandpierre, A. 2007, Biological Extension of the Action Principle: Endpoint Determination Beyond the Quantum Level and the Ultimate Physical Roots of Consciousness. Neuroquantology 5(4), 346–362.Google Scholar
  18. Grandpierre, A. 2008, Complexity Measures of Life. In: DIVINE ACTION and NATURAL SECTIONS: Science, Faith and Evolution. (in preparation), Seckbach, J. & R. Gordon, eds. Singapore, World Scientific.Google Scholar
  19. Grandpierre, A. and Agoston, G. 2005, On the Onset of Thermal Metastabilities in the Solar Core. Astrophysics and Space Science 298(4), 537–552.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. Green, D. E. and Reible, S. 1975, Paired Moving Charges in Mitochondrial Energy Coupling. II. Universality of the Principles for Energy Coupling in Biological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 72, 253–257.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. Harvey, W. R. and Slayman, C. L. 1994, Coupling as a Way of Life. Journal of Experimental Biology 196, 1–4.Google Scholar
  22. Haynie, D. T. 2001. Biological Thermodynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 81.Google Scholar
  23. Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M. 1959, Statistical Physics. Course in Theoretical Physics, translated by J. B. Sykes and W. H. Reid. Pergamon Press, London, Vol. 5, Part 1, pp. 14–18.Google Scholar
  24. Martinás, K. and Grandpierre, A. 2007, Thermodynamic Measure for Nonequilibrium Processes. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems (INDECS) 5, 1–13.Google Scholar
  25. Ossendrijver, M. and Hoyng, P. 2001, Solar Cycle, in Encyclopedia of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Paul Murdin, Editor-in-Chief. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia, PA; Nature Publishing Group, London, New York and Tokyo, p. 2502.Google Scholar
  26. Popa, R. 2004, Between Necessity and Probability: Searching for the Definition and Origin of Life. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  27. Purves, W K., Orians, G. H. and Heller, H. C. 1992, Life: The Science of Biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA; W.H. Freeman, New York, Third ed., p. 1.Google Scholar
  28. Roederer, J. 2003, On the Concept of Information and Its Role in Nature. Entropy, 5, 1–31, available at http://www.mdpi.net/entropy/papers/e5010003.pdf CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  29. Sundström, V. 2007, Ultrafast Science Course, ftp://student:ultrafast@athena.chemphys.lu.se/Schedule.pdfGoogle Scholar
  30. Tribus, M. and McIrvine, E. C. 1971, Energy and Information. Scientific American 225(3), 179–188; 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vogel, G. and Angermann, H. 1988, dtv-Atlas zur Biologie 1. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag GmBH & Co., München, p. 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Konkoly Observatory of the Hungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations