“It All Depends on the Lens, B’y”1: Local Ecological Knowledge and Institutional Science in an Expanding Finfish Aquaculture Sector

  • Larry Felt
Part of the The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics book series (LEAF, volume 17)

Apalpable lesson of resource management in the last twenty-five years is the necessity of meaningfully involving resource users in all elements of the management process. Whether the process is termed ‘co-management’ (Felt et al. 1997), collaborative governance (Paquet 2000) or any of several related terms, managerial devolvement is necessitated by the inadequacy of states to impose management from afar. If legitimacy and hence increased rule compliance is to occur, local resource users must understandmanagementinitiatives, considerthembeneficial as well as consistent with their knowledge of the resource and feel they have fully participated in their creationand adoption. An increasingly recognized benefit of such management ‘partnerships’ is the ability to utilize the extensive knowledge resource users have gained as a result of resource harvesting.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agrawl, A. 1995. Dismantling the Divide between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge. Development and Change. 26: 413–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkes, F. 1999. Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  3. Calder, S.C. 1997. Local Knowledge Matters: Knowledge, Technology and Power in Newfoundland Cod Farming. Thesis prepared for MA, Department of Sociology, Memorial University of Newfoundland. Spring 1997.Google Scholar
  4. Dempson, B. Personal Communication. June 22, 2005.Google Scholar
  5. Felt, L. 1994. Two Tales of a Fish: The Social Construction of Knowledge Among Atlantic Canadian salmon Fishers. In C. Dyer and R. McGoodwin. 1994. Folk Knowledge and the World’s Fisheries. Boulder: University of Colorado Press. 251–286.Google Scholar
  6. Felt, L. 2004. Social and Demographic changes to the Baie D’espair region of South Coast Newfoundland ten years after the Moratorium. Paper presented to workshop on Decade of Change: Ten years after the Cod Moratorium. May 22, 2004. St. John’s, p. 38.Google Scholar
  7. Felt, L. 2005. You Can’t Eat ‘paper fish’: Social Constructions of Fish in an Unexplained Crisis. In A. Herda-Rapp and T. Goedke, Eds. Mad About Wildlife. Volume 2, Human-Animal Studies. Briden:Brill, pp. 223–252.Google Scholar
  8. Felt, L.F., Neis, B. and McKay, B. 1997. Comanagement. In J. Boreman, B.S. Nakashima, J.A. Wilson and R.L. Kendall, Eds. Northwest Atlantic Groundfish: Perspectives on a Fishery in Crisis. Bethesda, Md.: American Fisheries Society. 185–94.Google Scholar
  9. Felt, L. and Oliver, S. 2006. Bridging Cultures and Negotiating Expectations: Challenges and Opportunities for Collaborative Watershed Stewardship in Canada. 3rd Annual Valuing Nature National Conference Theme Address. July 6, 2006. Corner Brook, NL. http://www.stewardship2006.ca. Accessed: July 18, 2007.
  10. Finlayson, A.C. 1991. The Social Construction and Reconstruction of a Scientific Crisis: A Sociological Analysis of Northern Cod Stock Assessments from 1977 to 1990. Thesis prepared for MA, Department of Sociology, Memorial University of Newfoundland. Spring 1991.Google Scholar
  11. Finalyson, A.C.1994. Fishing for Truth: A Sociological Investigation of Northern Cod Stock Assessments, 1977–1990. St. John’s: ISER Books.Google Scholar
  12. Fischer, J. 2000. Participatory research in ecological fieldwork: A Nicaraguan study In Neis and Felt, Finding Our Sea Legs. pp. 41–54.Google Scholar
  13. Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. 1997. A Study of Conflict Management in the Newfoundland and Labrador Aquaculture Industry. St. John’s: Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, 23. http://www.fishaq.gov.nl.ca/publications/aqua_man_study.stm. Accessed: July 18, 2007.
  14. Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. 2005. Regulations Pertaining to Aquaculture in Newfoundland and Labrador. St. John’s: Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture. http://www.fishaq.gov.nl.ca. Accessed: July 18, 2007.
  15. Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. 2000. Strategic Plan-Newfoundland and Labrador Aquaculture: Executive Summary and Listing of Recommendations. St. John’s: Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture. http://www.fishaq.gov.nl.ca. Accessed: July 18, 2007.
  16. Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, 2005. Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture. Year in Review. At URL http://www.fishaq.gov.nl.ca/publications/yir2005.pdf. Accessed: July 18, 2007.
  17. Government of Newfoundland and Labrador.2007. Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture. Annual Report, 2004–2005. Found at http://www.fishaq.gov.nl.ca/publications/ annual_report_05.stm. Accessed: July 18, 2007.
  18. Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. 2007. Newfoundland Statistical Agency. Community Accounts. Found at http://www.communityaccounts.ca/CommunityAccounts/ OnlineData/getdata.asp. Accessed: July 18, 2007.
  19. Government of Canada, Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). 2004. Estimates from data provided by Statistics Division, Policy and Economics Branch, Newfoundland Region.Google Scholar
  20. Government of Canada, Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). 1992. Overview of Fishery. Newfoundland Region. Available through Statistics Division, Policy and Economics Branxh, Newfoundland Region.Google Scholar
  21. Government of Canada, Environment Canada. 2006. Ways of Knowing and Understanding: Towards the Convergence of Traditional and Scientific Knowledge of Climate Change in the Canadian North. http://www.msc-smc.ec.gc.ca/saib/atmosphere/atmch_e.html. Accessed: July 18, 2007.
  22. Hacking, I. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hilborn, R. and Walters, C. 1982. Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment. New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Hume, S., Morton, A., Keller, B.C., Leslie, R.M., Langer, O., and Stanford, D. 2004. A Stain Upon the Sea: West Coast Salmon Farming. Vancouver: Harbour Publishing. PP. 288.Google Scholar
  25. Hutchings, J.A., Neis, B., and Ripley, P. 1996. The Nature of Cod (Gadus morhua): Perceptions of Stock Structure and Cod Behavior by Fishermen, ’Experts’ and Scientists from the nineteenth Century to the Present. In D. Vickers, Ed. Marine Resources and Human Societies in the North Atlantic Since 1500. ISER Conference Papers #5. St. John’s: ISER Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Hutchings, J.A., Walters, C., and Haedrich, R. 1997. Is Scientific Inquiry Incompatible with Government Information Control?. Can. J. Fish Aquat Sci.51: 2363–78.Google Scholar
  27. Johannes, R. 1981. Words of the Lagoon:Fishing and Marine Lore in the Palau District of Micronesia. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. Johannes, R. 1989. “Introduction” In Johannes, Ed. Traditional Ecological Knowledge: A collection of Essays. Gland, Switzerland and CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuhn, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Latour, B. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays in the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organization (NASCO). 2003. Report of the Sub Group on Salmon Co-operation (SalCo-op). January 2003.Google Scholar
  32. Neis, B. and Felt, L.F. 1995. Fisheries Science and Local Ecological Knowledge in the Northwest Atlantic: Building Bridges. In A. Davis and C. Fawcett, Eds. Japanese and Atlantic Canadian Fisheries Social Research: An International Seminar. Antigonish, Nova Scotia: St. Francis Xavier University, pp. 6–25.Google Scholar
  33. Neis, B. and Felt, L.F. 2000. Finding Our Sea Legs: Linking Fishery People and their Knowledge with Science and Management. St. John’s: ISER Press.Google Scholar
  34. Paquet, G. 2000. The new governance, subsidiarity and the strategic state. Paper delivered following the OECD Forum on 21st century governance: power in the global knowledge economy and society. Hanover, Germany, Spring 2000.Google Scholar
  35. Porter, G. 2005. Protecting Wild Atlantic Salmon from Impacts of Salmon Aquaculture: A Country-by-Country Progress Report. Washington, D.C and St. Andrews, New Brunswick: World Wildlife Fund and Atlantic Salmon Federation, 56. http://www.asf.ca/ docs/issues/impacts2005.pdf. Accessed: July 18, 2007.
  36. Porter, T.R. Personal Communication. January 23, 2005.Google Scholar
  37. Schering-Plough Animal Health. 2005. Product and Disease Directory. http://www. spaquaculture.com/default.aspx?pageid=536. Accessed: July 18, 2007.
  38. Strum, S. and Fedigan, L.M. 2000. Primate Encounters: Models of Science, Gender and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Whoriskey, F. 2004. Report of Atlantic Salmon Federation Research Initiatives, 2004. Atlantic Salmon Federation Annual General Meeting, Montreal 13, 2005.Google Scholar
  40. Wright, M. 2001. A Fishery for Modern Times. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 196.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Larry Felt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyMemorial University of NewfoundlandNewfoundlandCanada

Personalised recommendations