Dissertation Support Groups: Building a Community of Practice Using Noddings' Ethic of Care

Part of the Explorations of Educational Purpose book series (EXEP, volume 4)

As four women spending a quarter of a decade writing individual dissertations, our goal was not to write a chapter together. It was to complete the final step of our academic training with our sanity and self-images intact. Perhaps you too know the experience of dissertation writing: often brutal and isolating. There are no road maps or training guides — you need the stamina of a marathon runner. Dissertation writing demands deliberate and ongoing preparation, absolute devotion to a topic, commitment to months or years of research and writing, and an unwavering belief in the ability to realize a goal. Few sprint from start to finish. Instead, many get mired in a solitary, time-consuming process, often a decade-long endeavor (Hoffer & Welch, 2006).

Research indicates that approximately 25% of doctoral candidates abandon the pursuit upon reaching the dissertation stage (Ballinger, 2003). Those dropping out cite reasons such as lack of support systems and structure (Ballinger, 2003; Dorn & Papalewis, 1997). Other challenging pursuits, like marathon running, offer training programs, online regimens, and other organized support. Dissertation writing, however, offers few organized support systems. Although we discovered articles detailing structures for dissertation support groups, much of the literature was outdated or lacked practical information regarding sustaining a group while also “having a life.”


Doctoral Student Lesson Study Personal Support Teacher Professional Development Conference Call 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ballinger, B. (2003, September 21). Almost there; completing the dissertation is all that remains for many doctoral candidates — but that can prove an overwhelming obstacle. The Chicago Tribune, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  2. Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  3. Bullough, R.V. Jr. & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Collison, C. & Parcell, G. (2001) Learning to fly: Practical lessons from one of the world's leading knowledge companies. Oxford: Capstone.Google Scholar
  5. Crowe, A.R. & Whitlock, T. (1999, April). The education of teacher educators: A self-study of the professional development of two doctoral students in teacher education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association in Montreal, Quebec.Google Scholar
  6. Dinkleman, T. (2003). Self-study in teacher education: A means and ends tool for promoting reflective teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 16–18.Google Scholar
  7. Dixon, N.M. (2000). Common knowledge: How companies thrive by sharing what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dorn, S. & Papalewis, R. (1997, March). Improving doctoral student retention. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association in Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  9. Ely, M., Anzul, M., Friedman, T., Garner, D., & Steinmetz, A. M. (1991). Doing qualitative research: Circles within circles. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  10. Evans, T. (1996). From A.B.D. status to Ed.D.: A successful dissertation support group. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED405530) Retrieved from ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center) database.Google Scholar
  11. Glasser, B. D. & Strauss, A. K. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
  12. Hoffer, T. B. & Welch, V. (2006). Time to Degree of US Research Doctorate Recipients. National Science Foundation. Retrieved on June 17, 2006 from
  13. Inman, A.G. & Silverstein, M.E. (2003). Dissertation support group: To dissertate or not is the question. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 17(3), 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
  15. Loughran, J. & Gunstone, R. (1996, April). Self-study in teaching and research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association in New York.Google Scholar
  16. McDonald, J., Mohr, N., Dichter, A. & McDonald, E.C. (2003). The power of protocols: An educator's guide to better practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  17. McLaughlin, M.W. & Talbert, J. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities. Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  19. Northfield, J. (1996, April). Quality and the self-study perspective on research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association in New York.Google Scholar
  20. Pauley, D. (2004). Group therapy for dissertation-writers: The right modality for a struggling population. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 18(4), 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Putnam, R. T. & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.Google Scholar
  22. Russell, T. & Loughran, J. (2005). Self-study as a context for productive learning. Studying Teacher Education, 1(2), 103–106.Google Scholar
  23. Schwandt, T. A. (1997). Qualitative inquiry: A dictionary of terms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1994). Building community in schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Sincell, M. (2000). Sharing the pain. Retrieved on November 2, 2005 from
  26. Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  27. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker. 9(5). Retrieved July 20, 2006, from
  28. Wolcott, H. F. (2001). Writing up qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations