Mechanical Properties of Brain Tissue: Characterisation and Constitutive Modelling

  • J.A.W. van Dommelen
  • M. Hrapko
  • G.W.M. Peters
Part of the Mechanosensitivity in Cells and Tissues book series (MECT, volume 2)

Abstract

The head is often considered as the most critical region of the human body for life-threatening injuries sustained in accidents. In order to develop effective protective measures, a better understanding of the process of injury development in the brain is required. Finite Element (FE) models are being developed, in order to predict the mechanical response of the contents of the head during impact. To obtain accurate predictions of the mechanical response of the brain, an accurate description of the mechanical behaviour of brain tissue is required. However, up to now no universally accepted data set for the constitutive response of brain tissue exists. The large variation in material properties reported may be caused by differences in testing methods and protocols used. An overview of studies on the mechanical properties of brain tissue is presented, focusing on testing methods. Furthermore, the large strain mechanical response of brain tissue as well as modelling approaches for this behaviour are discussed.

Keywords

Brain Tissue Constitutive Model Mechanical Properties Rheology Viscoelasticity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arbogast KB, Margulies SS (1997) Regional differences in mechanical properties of the porcine central nervous system. In Proceedings of the 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference, number SAE 973336, pp. 293–300.Google Scholar
  2. Arbogast KB, Margulies SS (1998) Material characterization of the brainstem from oscillatory shear tests. J. Biomech., 31(9):801–807.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arbogast KB, Meaney DF, Thibault LE (1995) Biomechanical characterization of the constitutive relationship for the brainstem. In Proceedings of the 39th Stapp Car Crash Conference, number SAE 952716, pp. 153–159.Google Scholar
  4. Arbogast KB, Prange MT, Meaney DF, Margulies, SS (1997) Properties of cerebral gray and white matter undergoing large deformation. Symp. Proc. Center for Disease Control, Wayne State University, pp. 33–39.Google Scholar
  5. Bain AC, Meaney DF (2000) Tissue-level thresholds for axonal damage in an experimental model of cerebral nervous system white matter injury. J. Biomech. Eng -T. ASME, 122:615–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bilston LE, Liu Z, Phan-Thien N (1997) Linear viscoelastic properties of bovine brain tissue in shear. Biorheology, 34(6):377–385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bilston LE, Liu Z, Phan-Thien N (2001) Large strain behavior of brain tissue in shear: Some experimental data and differential constitutive model. Biorheology, 38(3):335–345.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brands DWA (2002) Predicting Brain Mechanics During Closed Head Impact; Numerical and Constitutive Aspects. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  9. Brands DWA, Bovendeerd PHM, Peters GWM, Wismans JSHM (2000) The large shear strain dynamic behavior of in-vitro porcine brain tissue and the silicone gel model material. In Proceedings of the 44th Stapp Car Crash Conference, number SAE 200001-SC17, pp. 249–260.Google Scholar
  10. Brands DWA, Bovendeerd PHM, Peters GWM, Wismans JSHM, Paas MHJW, van Bree JLMJ (1999) Comparison of the dynamic behavior of the brain tissue and two model materials. In Proceedings of the 43rd Stapp Car Crash Conference, number SAE 99SC21, pp. 57–64.Google Scholar
  11. Brands DWA, Peters GWM, Bovendeerd PHM (2004) Design and numerical implementation of a 3-d non-linear viscoelastic constitutive model for brain tissue during impact. J. Biomech., 37(1):127–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brooks CA, Gabella B, Hoffman R, Sosin D, Whiteneck G (1997) Traumatic brain injury: designing and implementing a population-based follow-up system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 78:S26–S30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng S, Bilston LE (2007) Unconfined compression of white matter. J. Biomech., 40(1):117–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Claessens MHA, Sauren F, Wismans JSHM (1997) Modelling of the human head under impact conditions: A parametric study. In Proceedings of the 41th Stapp Car Crash Conference, number SAE 973338, page 315328.Google Scholar
  15. Darvish KK, Crandall JR (1999) Investigating nonlinear viscoelastic properties of brain tissue using the forced vibration method. American Society of Biomechanics, 24th Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
  16. Darvish KK, Crandall JR (2001) Nonlinear viscoelastic effects in oscillatory shear deformation of brain tissue. Med. Eng. Phys., 23(9):633–645.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Darvish KK, Takhounts EG, Crandall JR (1998) A dynamic method to develop nonlinear viscoelastic model of brain tissue. Advances in Bioengineering, ASME-BED, 39.Google Scholar
  18. Dogson MCH (1962) Colloidal structures of brain. Biorheology, 1(1):21–30.Google Scholar
  19. Donnelly BR (1998) Brain tissue material properties: A comparison of results. Biomechanical Research: Experimental and Computational, Proceedings of the 26th International Workshop, 6:47–57.Google Scholar
  20. Donnelly BR, Medige J (1997) Shear properties of human brain tissue. J. Biomech. Eng -T. ASME, 119(4):423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Estes MS, McElhaney JH (1970) Response of brain tissue of compressive loading. In Proceedings of the 4th ASME Biomechanics Conf., number 70-BHF-13.Google Scholar
  22. Etoh A, Mitaku S, Yamamoto J, Okano K (1994) Ultrasonic absorption anomaly of brain tissue. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 33:2874–2879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ETSC (1999) Exposure data for travel risk assessment. Technical report, European Transport Safety Council, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  24. Fallenstein GT, Hulce VD, Melvin JW (1969) Dynamic mechanical properties of human brain tissue. J. Biomech., 2(3):217–226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferry JD (1980) Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers; Third Edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Franceschini G, Bigoni D, Regitnig P, Holzapfel GA (2006) Brain tissue deforms similarly to filled elastomers and follows consolidation theory. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 54(12):2592–2620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fung Y (1981) Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Funk J, Hall G, Crandall J, Pilkey W (2000) Linear and quasi-linear viscoelastic characterization of ankle ligaments. J. Biomech. Eng., 122:15–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Galford JE, McElhaney JH (1970) A viscoelastic study of scalp, brain, and dura. J. Biomech., 3:211–221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Garo A, Hrapko M, van Dommelen JAW, Peters GWM (2007) Towards a reliable characterisation of the mechanical behaviour of brain tissue: the effects of post-mortem time and sample preparation. Biorheology, (47):51–58.Google Scholar
  31. Gefen A, Gefen N, Zhu Q, Raghupathi R, Margulies SS (2003) Age-dependent changes in material properties of the brain and braincase of the rat. J. Neurotraum, 20(11):1163–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gefen A, Margulies SS (2004) Are in-vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar? J. Biomech., 37(9):1339–1352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goldman DE, Hueter TF (1956) Tabular data of the velocity and absorption of high-frequency sound in mammalian tissues. J. Acoustical Soc. Am., 28(1): 35–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goldsmith W (1972) Biomechanics of head injury. In Fung, YC, Perrone, N, Anliker, M, editors, Biomechanics – Its Foundation and Objectives, pp. 585–634, Prentice–Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  35. Hamhaber U, Sack I, Papazoglou S, Rump J, Klatt D, Braun J (2007) Three-dimensional analysis of shear wave propagation observed by in-vivo magnetic resonance elastography of the brain. Acta Biomater, 3(1):127–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Henn H (1998) Crash tests and the head injury criterion. Teach. Math. Appl., 17:162–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hrapko M, Gervaise H, van Dommelen JAW, Peters GWM, Wismans JSHM (2007a) Identifying the mechanical behaviour of brain tissue in both shear and compression. In Proceedings of the IRCOBI Conference, pp. 143–159.Google Scholar
  38. Hrapko M, van Dommelen JAW, Peters GWM, Wismans JSHM (2006) The mechanical behaviour of brain tissue: large strain response and constitutive modelling. Biorheology, 43:623–636.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hrapko M, van Dommelen JAW, Peters GWM, Wismans JSHM (2007b) On the characterisation of the mechanical properties of brain tissue: the influence of test conditions. J. Biomech. Eng., accepted.Google Scholar
  40. Koeneman JB (1966) Viscoelastic properties of brain tissue. Unpublished M.S. Thesis, Case Institute of Technology, USA.Google Scholar
  41. Kruse SA, Dresner MA, Rossman PJ, Felmlee JP, Jack CR, Ehman RL (1999) Palpation of the brain using magnetic resonance elastography. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, page 258.Google Scholar
  42. Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Thomas KE (2004) Traumatic brain injury in the united states: Emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths. Technical report, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.Google Scholar
  43. Lin S, Grimm MJ (1998) Characterization of the mechanical properties of brain tissue using ultrasound. Symp. Proc. Center for Disease Control, Wayne State University, pp. 59–64.Google Scholar
  44. Lin S, Shieh S, Grimm MJ (1997) Ultrasonic measurements of brain tissue properties. Symp. Proc. Center for Disease Control, Wayne State University, pp. 27–31.Google Scholar
  45. Lippert SA, Rang EM, Grimm MJ (2003) The wave-in-a-tube method for estimation of mechanical properties of viscoelastic materials using ultrasound. J. Test. Eval., 31(1):73–78.Google Scholar
  46. Lippert SA, Rang EM, Grimm MJ (2004) The high frequency properties of brain tissue. Biorheology, 41(6):681–691.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Manduca A, Lake DS, Kruse SA, Ehman RL (2003) Spatio-temporal directional filtering for improved inversion of mr elastography images. Med. Image Anal., 7(4):465–473.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Manduca A, Oliphant TE, Dresner MA, Mahowald JL, Kruse SA, Amromin E, Felmlee JP, Greenleaf JF, Ehman RL (2001) Magnetic resonance elastography: Non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity. Med. Image Anal., 5(4):237–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McCracken PJ, Manduca A, Felmlee J, Ehman RL (2005) Mechanical transient-based magnetic resonance elastography. Magn. Reson. Med., 53(1):628–639.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McElhaney JH, Melvin JW, Roberts VL, Portnoy HD (1973) Dynamic characteristics of the tissues of the head. In Kenedi, RM, editor, Perspectives in Biomedical Engineering, pp. 215–222, MacMillan Press, London.Google Scholar
  51. McElhaney JH, Roberts VL, Hilyard JF (1976) Handbook of human tolerance, Japan Automobile Research Institute Inc., Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  52. Mendis KK, Stalnaker RL, Advani SH (1995) A constitutive relationship for large deformation finite element modeling of brain tissue. J. Biomech. Eng -T. ASME, 117(3):279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Metz H, McElhaney J, Ommaya AK (1970) A comparison of the elasticity of live, dead, and fixed brain tissue. J. Biomech., 3:453–458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Miller K (1997) Constitutive modeling of brain tissue: Experiment and theory. J. Biomech., 30(11–12):1115–1121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Miller K (1999) Constitutive model of brain tissue suitable for finite element analysis of surgical procedures. J. Biomech., 32(5):531–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Miller K (2000) Biomechanics of soft tissues. Med. Sci. Monit., 6(1):158–167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Miller, K. (2001). How to test very soft biological tissue in extension. J. Biomech., 34(5):651–657.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Miller K (2005) Method of testing very soft biological tissues in compression. J. Biomech., 38(1):153–158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Miller K, Chinzei K (2002) Mechanical properties of brain tissue in tension. J. Biomech., 35(4):483–490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Miller K, Chinzei K, Orssengo G, Bednarz P (2000) Mechanical properties of brain tissue in-vivo: experiment and computer simulation. J. Biomech., 33(11):1369–1376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Morrison III B, Cater HL, Wang CC-B, Thomas FC, Hung CT, Ateshian GA, Sundstrom LE (2003) A tissue level tolerance criterion for living brain developed with an in-vitro model of traumatic mechanical loading. Stapp Car Crash J., 47:93–106.Google Scholar
  62. Nicolle S, Lounis M, Willinger R (2004) Shear properties of brain tissue over a frequency range relevant for automotive impact situations: New experimental results. Stapp Car Crash J., 48:239–258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Nicolle S, Lounis M, Willinger R, Palierne JF (2005) Shear linear behaviour of brain tissue over a large frequency range. Biorheology, 42(3):209–223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Ning X, Zhu Q, Lanir Y, Margulies SS (2006) A transversely isotropic viscoelastic constitutive equation for brainstem undergoing finite deformation. J. Biomech. Eng. -T. ASME, 128(6):925–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ommaya AK (1968) Mechanical properties of tissue of the nervous system. J. Biomech., 1(2):127–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Peden M, Scurfield R, Sleet D, Mohan D, Hyder AA, Jarawan E, Mathers C (2004) World report on road traffic injury prevention. Technical report, World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  67. Peters GWM, Baaijens FPT (1997) Modelling of non-isothermal viscoelastic flows, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 68:205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Peters GWM, Meulman JH, Sauren AHJ (1997) The applicability of the time/temperature superposition principle to brain tissue. Biorheology, 34(2):127–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Prange MT, Margulies SS (1999) Anisotropy and inhomogeneity of the mechanical properties of brain tissue at large deformation. Symp. Proc. Center for Disease Control, Wayne State University.Google Scholar
  70. Prange MT, Margulies SS (2002) Regional, directional, and age-dependent properties of the brain undergoing large deformation. J. Biomech. Eng -T. ASME, 124(2):244–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Prange MT, Meaney DF, Margulies SS (1998a) Directional properties of gray and white brain tissue. Symp. Proc. Center for Disease Control, Wayne State University, pp. 65–71.Google Scholar
  72. Prange MT, Meaney DF, Margulies SS (1998b) Directional properties of gray and white brain tissue. Symp. Proc. Center for Disease Control, Wayne State University.Google Scholar
  73. Prange MT, Meaney DF, Margulies SS (2000) Defining brain mechanical properties: Effects of region, direction, and species. Proceedings of the 44th Stapp Car Crash Conference, (2000-01-SC15):205–213.Google Scholar
  74. Shen F, Tay TE, Li JZ, Nigen S, Lee PVS, Chan HK (2006) Modified bilston nonlinear viscoelastic model for finite element head injury studies. J. Biomech. Eng -T. ASME, 5(128):797–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shuck LZ, Advani SH (1972) Rheological response of human brain tissue in shear. J. Basic Eng., 94:905–911.Google Scholar
  76. Takhounts EG, Crandall JR, Darvish KK (2003) On the importance of nonlinearity of brain tissue under large deformations. Stapp Car Crash J., 47:107–134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Takhounts EG, Crandall JR, Matthews BT (1999) Shear properties of brain tissue using non-linear green-rivlin viscoelastic constitutive equation. Injury Biomechanics Research, Proc. of the 27th International Workshop, 11:141–156.Google Scholar
  78. Thibault KL, Margulies SS (1996) Material properties of the developing porcine brain. In Proceedings of the IRCOBI Conference, pp. 75–85.Google Scholar
  79. Thibault KL, Margulies SS (1998) Age-dependent material properties of the porcine cerebrum: Effect on pediatric inertial head injury criteria. J. Biomech., 31(12):1119–1126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Thibault LE, Gennarelli TA (1985) Biomechanics and craniocerebral trauma. Central Nervous System Trauma, Status Report, National Institutes of Health, 24:379–389.Google Scholar
  81. van Turnhout M, Oomens C, Peters G, Stekelenburg A (2005) Passive transverse mechanical properties as a function of temperature of rat skeletal muscle in-vitro. Biorheology, 42(3):193–207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Velardi F, Fraternali F, Angelillo M (2006) Anisotropic constitutive equations and experimental tensile behavior of brain tissue. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 5(1):53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Versace J (1971) A review of the severity index. In Proceedings of the 15th Stapp Car Crash Conference, number SAE 710881, pp. 771–796.Google Scholar
  84. Viano D, von Holst H, Gordon E (1997) Serious brain injury from traffic related causes: Priorities for primairy prevention. Accident Anal. Prev., 29:811–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wang HC, Wineman AS (1972) A mathematical model for the determination of viscoelastic behavior of brain in-vivo. J. Biomech., 5:431–446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Waxweiler R, Thurman D, Sniezek J, Sosin D, Niell J (1995) Monitoring the impact of traumatic brain injury: A review and update. J. Neurotrauma, 12:509–516.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Woo S-Y, Hollis J, Adams D, Lyon R, Takai S (1991) Tensile properties of the human femur-anterior cruciate ligament-tibia complex: The effects of specimen age and orientation. Am. J. Sports Medicine, 19:217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wu JZ, Gong RG, Schopper AW (2004) Analysis of effects of friction on the deformation behaviour of soft tissues in unconfined compression tests. J. Biomech., 37:147– 155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.A.W. van Dommelen
    • 1
  • M. Hrapko
  • G.W.M. Peters
  1. 1.Materials Technology InstituteEindhoven University of Technology5600 MBThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations