Shaping Ethical Guidelines for an Influenza Pandemic

  • Rosemarie Tong
Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 42)


This chapter describes the process of shaping ethical guidelines for an influenza pandemic by the North Carolina Institute of Medicine (NC IOM)/North Carolina Department of Public Health (NCDPH) Task Force. The author discusses the threat of a pandemic in the twenty-first century, comparing a potential pandemic with past flu pandemics as well as the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreak in Canada and parts of Asia. Also discussed are the ways in which influenza would spread, be treated, and hopefully contained. Addressed are the ways in which one becomes ethically prepared for an influenza pandemic, as well as the challenges to incorporating ethical guidelines in preparations. Tong also addresses the role of a duty/obligation/responsibility to work by health care personnel, the role of volunteers, and when health care personnel may refuse to treat someone. Also taken into consideration are such issues as the distribution of food and vaccines, quarantines, work stoppage, both physical and social infrastructure, the role of military and police forces, and the effect of a pandemic, isolation, and quarantine on various industries. Tong shows the complicated nature of working on a task force and the complexity of incorporating ethics into logistical planning.


Influenza pandemic Avian flu flu vaccine health care personnel bioethics obligation responsibility ethics of care quarantine North Carolina Public Health international public health 


  1. Adler, J. 2005. “The fight against the flu.” Newsweek (October 31, 2005): 44.Google Scholar
  2. Berlinger, N. 2006. “Influenza pandemic and the fair allocation of scarce life-saving resources: how can we make the hardest of choices?” The Hasting Center Bioethics Backgrounder,
  3. Department of Health and Human Services. 2006. “Pandemic planning assumptions.” Available at Accessed December 11, 2006.
  4. Emanuel, E. J. and Wertheimer, A. 2006. “Who should get influenza vaccine when not all can?” Science 312(5775): 854–855.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Engel, J. P., MD. 2007. “Pandemic influenza: the critical issues and North Carolina’s preparedness plan.” North Carolina Medical Journal: A Journal of Health Policy Analysis and Debate 68(1): 32.Google Scholar
  6. Garloch, K. 2006. “Avian flu: are we ready?” The Charlotte Observer (Sunday, April 9, 2006): A1.Google Scholar
  7. Jha, P. 2004. “Doing good on a global scale.” University of Toronto Bulletin. November 8, 2004. Accessed May 25, 2007 from–665.asp.
  8. Jonsen, A. 2000. A Short History of Medical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kant, I. 1964. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, translated and analyzed by H.J. Paton, New York: Harper & Row, p. 96.Google Scholar
  10. Kerin, J. 2007. “Business preparation for an influenza pandemic.” North Carolina Medical Journal 68(1): 62–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kohlberg, L. 1971. “From is to ought: how to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development.” In Cognitive Development and Epistemology, ed. T. Mischel, 164–165. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. McGorty, E. K., JD, MA; Devlin, L. DDS, MPH; Tong, R. PhD; Harrison, N.; Holmes, M., PhD; and Silberman, P., JD, PhD. 2007. “Ethical guidelines for an influenza pandemic.” North Carolina Medical Journal: A Journal of Health Policy Analysis and Debate 68(1): 39.Google Scholar
  13. NC IOM/DPH Task Force (North Carolina Institute of Medicine and Division of Public Health Task Force on Ethics and Pandemic Influenza Planning). 2007. “Ethical guidelines for an influenza pandemic.” DRAFT. North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, 23.Google Scholar
  14. PEPPPI (Public Engagement Pilot Program on Pandemic Influenza). 2005. “Citizen voices on pandemic flu choices: a report of the public engagement pilot program on pandemic influenza.” The Keystone Center: Denver, 7.Google Scholar
  15. Rand, A. 1964. The Virtue of Selfishness. New York: Signet.Google Scholar
  16. Rhyne, J. A. MD. 2007. “Likely ethical, legal, and professional challenges physicians will face during an influenza pandemic.” North Carolina Medical Journal: A Journal of Health Policy Analysis and Debate 68(1): 51.Google Scholar
  17. Thomas, E. 2005. “The lost city—special report: after Katrina.” Newsweek (September 12, 2005): pp. 47–48.Google Scholar
  18. Toulmin, S. 1981. “The tyranny of principles.” The Hastings Center 11(6): 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics Pandemic Influenza Working Group. 2005. “Stand on guard for thee: ethical considerations in preparedness planning for pandemic influenza.” University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics.Google Scholar
  20. World Health Organization. 2007. Current WHO phase of pandemic alert. Available at Accessed February 14, 2007.
  21. Yount, K. 2005. “Man vs. virus: why we’re worried about ‘bird flu.’ ” UAB Magazine (Fall 2005): 21.Google Scholar
  22. Zuger, M. A., S.H. 1987. “Physicians, AIDS and occupational risk: historic traditions and ethical obligations.” JAMA 258: 1924–1928.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosemarie Tong
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Ethics and Applied PhilosophyUniversity of North CarolinaCharlotte

Personalised recommendations