The Great Earthquakes of Lisbon 1755 and Aceh 2004 Shook the World. Seismologists’ Societal Responsibility

  • Karl Fuchs
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 7)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ammon CJ et al. (2005) Science, vol 308 1133 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Baptista MA, Miranda J, Chierici F, Zitellini N (2003) New study of the 1755 earthquake source based on multi-channel seismic survey data and tsunami modelling. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, vol 3 pp 333–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burdick E (1964) The 480. (Novel cited by V. Keilis-Borok, 2003.)Google Scholar
  4. Dynes RR (2003) The Lisbon Earthquake in 1755: The first modern disaster. Preliminary Paper, Disaster Research Center, Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, <http://www.udel.edu/DRC/Preliminary_Papers/PP333%20Lisbon%20earthquake.pdf>
  5. Fischetti M (2001) Drowning New Orleans. Scientific American, October 2001Google Scholar
  6. Fischetti M (2005) They saw it coming. New York Times, 2 September 2005Google Scholar
  7. Giardini D, Grünthal G, Shedlock KM, Zhang P (1999) The GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map. Annali di Geofisica, vol. 42/6 pp 1225–1230Google Scholar
  8. Grünthal G, Mayer-Rosa D, Lenhardt WA (1998) Abschätzung der Erdbebengefährdung für die D-A-CH-Staaten. – Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz. Bautechnik, 75 Jahrgang vol 10 pp 3–17Google Scholar
  9. Günther H (2005) Das Erdbeben von Lissabon und die Erschütterung des aufgeklärten Europa. Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, Frankfurt a. Main, 125 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Gutenberg B, Richter C (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, vol 34 pp 185–188Google Scholar
  11. Gutscher MA (2004) What caused the Great Lisbon Earthquake? Science, vol. 305 pp 1247–1248, 27. IUGG Commission on Geophysical Risk and Sustainability, (2005) Statement on the Greatest Earthquake and Tsunami of the Early XXI Century and the Need for Urgent Action to Reduce Natural Disasters in the Indian Ocean Region and Elsewhere. Boulder, Colorado: IUGG 7.01.2005. www.iugg-georisk.org/reports/IUGG_GeoRisk_st_full.pdf and ICSU Statement Science and Natural Hazards, 2005: www.icsu.org/Gestion/img/ICSU_DOC_DOWNLOAD/557_DD_FILE_Natural_Hazards
  12. Johnston AC (1996) Seismic moment assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions – III. New Madrid 1811-1812, Charleston 1886 and Lisbon 1755. Geophys J Int vol 126 pp 314–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kant I (1756) Geschichte und Naturbeschreibung der merkwuerdigsten Vorfaelle des Erdbebens welches an dem Ende des 1755sten Jahres einen grossen Theil der Erde erschuettert hat. Koenigsberg, 1756. In: Immanuel Kants fruehere noch nicht gesammelte kleine Schriften, Lintz (ed) 1795Google Scholar
  14. Keilis-Borok VI (2003) Basic science for prediction and reduction of geological disasters. In: Beer T Ismail-Zadeh A (eds) Risk, Science and Sustainability. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 29–38Google Scholar
  15. Kendrick TD (1956) The Lisbon Earthquake. JB Lippincott Co., Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  16. Knopoff L (1999) Earthquake prediction is difficult but not impossible. Nature debates, 11 March 1999 www.nature.com/nature/debates/earthquake/equake_6.html
  17. Koken JC (1756) Die Stimme Gottes im Erdbeben. Hildesheim, 168 p. – see Günther H (2005) ibid.Google Scholar
  18. Leibniz GW (1710) Essais de Theodicée sur la Bonté de Dieu, la Liberté de Homme et l’Origine de Mal. Libraire Isaac Troyel, Amsterdam ; German Translation A. Buchenau, Hamburg, 1977Google Scholar
  19. Livermore HV (1976) A new history of Portugal. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Pope A (1733/34) Essay on manGoogle Scholar
  21. Press F (1984) Keynote address. Opening Ceremony of the 8th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering in San Francisco, July 1984Google Scholar
  22. Rademacher H (2005a) Die vorhergesagte Katastrophe. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 2. September 2005Google Scholar
  23. Rademacher H (2005b) Alte Erde, neuer Irrglaube. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 1. November 2005Google Scholar
  24. Richard JF (2002) High Noon -20 Global Problems, 20 Years to solve them. Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  25. Richter C (1958) Elementary Seismology. Freeman, San Francisco, 768 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Shklar JN (1990) The faces of injustice. Yale University Press, New Haven pp 51–55Google Scholar
  27. Soloviev AA, Ismail-Zadeh A (2003) Models of dynamics of block-and-fault systems, in Nonlinear Dynamics of the Lithosphere and Earthquake Prediction, Keilis-Borok, VI. Soloviev AA. (eds.), pp 69–138, Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  28. Stein S (2005) Speed and size of the Sumatra Earthquake. Nature, 31 March 2005, vol 434 pp 581–582 http://www.earth.northwestern.edu/people/seth/research/sumatra2.html
  29. Voltaire (1756) Poème sur le désastre de Lisbonne. Journal encyclopédique, Liège.Google Scholar
  30. Voltaire (1759) Candide. Œuvres complètes vol 9. vol edn Moland Paris 1877Google Scholar
  31. Wald D, Quitoriano V, Heaton T, Kanamori H,. Scrivner C, Worden B (1999) TriNet “ShakeMaps”: rapid generation of peak ground motion and intensity maps for earthquakes in southern California. Earthquake Spectra vol 15 pp 537–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wenzel F, Bendimerad F (2003) Earthquakes and Megacities. In: Risk Science and Sustainability, Proc. Volume of the NATO Advanced Workshop on Science for Reduction of Risk and Sustainable Development of Society, T. Beer & A. Ismail-Zadeh (eds.) Budapest 2002, Nato Sciences Series vol 112 pp 111–125Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl Fuchs
    • 1
  1. 1.Geophysical Institute University FridericianaHertz-StrGermany

Personalised recommendations