From Democratization of Knowledge to Bridge Building between Science, Technology and Society

Chapter

Abstract

For the past 20 years, the Quebec Government has monitored scientific and technical culture. This chapter reviews the situation, from the viewpoint of the Conseil de la science et de la technologie (the Science and Technology Council), showing how ideas about the culture have changed over that period. The changes are closely linked to scientific and technological development and the policies connected with it. Through the democratization of knowledge and the building of bridges between science, technology and society—processes that work in both directions—the official view of scientific and technical culture has been modified. Today, it is conceived as an interface, stimulating exchanges between scientists and other social actors. As a result, research is more attuned to community needs. Perspectives STS (science, technology, society)—a project initiated by the Science and Technology Council—illustrates this evolution.

Keywords

New production of knowledge participatory processes in the field of science and technology relationships between researchers and civil society science technology and civil society scientific and technical culture 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alix, J.-P. (Ed.) (2007). Sciences et société en mutation. Paris: CNRS éditions.Google Scholar
  2. Arpin, A. (1994). Apprendre à vivre avec la science. Closing talk at Quand la science se fait culture conference, Montreal, April.Google Scholar
  3. Bussière, P., Knighton, T. & Pennock, D. (2007). Measuring up: Canadian results of the OECD PISA study. The performance of Canada’s youth in science, reading and mathematics. 2006 First results for Canadians aged 15. Ottawa: Ministry of Industry.Google Scholar
  4. CETECH (Centre d’étude sur l’emploi et la technologie) (2004). Les travailleurs hautement qualifiés au Québec. Portrait dynamique du marché du travail. Sainte-Foy: Government of Quebec.Google Scholar
  5. Filiatrault, P. & Ducharme, J. (1990). Le développement des sciences et de la technologie au Québec: perceptions de la population. CRG/Acfas/UQAM/SPST, October.Google Scholar
  6. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Godin, B. (1999). Les usages sociaux de la culture scientifique. Saint-Nicolas: Les presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
  8. GQ (Government of Quebec) (1965). Livre blanc. Ministry of Cultural Affairs.Google Scholar
  9. GQ (Government of Quebec) (1976). Pour l’évolution de la politique culturelle. Working paper. Ministry of Cultural Affairs, May.Google Scholar
  10. GQ (Government of Quebec) (1978). La politique québécoise du développement culturel. Quebec: Official Publisher.Google Scholar
  11. GQ (Government of Quebec) (1979). Pour une politique québécoise de la recherche scientifique. Quebec: Official Publisher.Google Scholar
  12. GQ (Government of Quebec) (1982). Le virage technologique. Bâtir le Québec—Phase 2. Programme d’action économique 1982–1986. Ministry of State for Economic Development.Google Scholar
  13. GQ (Government of Quebec) (2007). Dépenses intra-muros de R-D (DIRD) en pourcentage du PIB, Québec et autres provinces ou régions canadiennes, pays de l’OCDE, Union européenne, G7 et certains pays hors de l’OCDE. Data bank of official statistics at http://www.bdso.gouv.qc.ca.
  14. Latour, B. (1998). From the world of science to the world of research. Science, 280, pp. 208–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ME (Ministry of Education) (2004). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study TIMSS 2003. Results achieved by Quebec students on the 2003 mathematics and science tests. Quebec: Government of Quebec, December.Google Scholar
  16. MEDIET (Ministry of Economic Development, Innovation and Export Trade) (2006a). Rapport annuel de gestion 2005–2006. Quebec: Government of Quebec.Google Scholar
  17. MEDIET (Ministry of Economic Development, Innovation and Export Trade) (2006b). Un Québec innovant et prospère. Stratégie québécoise de la recherche et de l’innovation. Quebec: Government of Quebec.Google Scholar
  18. MEDIET (Ministry of Economic Development, Innovation and Export Trade) (2005). Tableau de bord du système d’innovation québécois édition 2005. Quebec: Government of Quebec.Google Scholar
  19. MELS (Ministry of Education, Leisure and Sport) (2005). School achievement indicators program. Council of Ministers of Education (Canada) SAIP 2004. Quebec results in the 2004 science assessment. Quebec: Government of Quebec, January.Google Scholar
  20. MELS (Ministry of Education, Leisure and Sport) (2007). Indicateurs de l’éducation–édition 2007. Government of Quebec, http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca/stat/indic07/index.htm.
  21. MERDR (Ministry of Economic and Regional Development and Research) (2004). Bilan de la progression des Québécoises en sciences et en technologies de 1993 à 2003. Sillery: Government of Quebec.Google Scholar
  22. MHES (Ministry of Higher Education and Science) (1988). énoncé d’orientations et plan de développement de la culture scientifique et technique au Québec. Sainte-Foy: Government of Quebec, May.Google Scholar
  23. MRST (Ministry of Research, Science and Technology) (2001). Savoir changer le monde. Politique québécoise de la science et de l’innovation. Sillery: Government of Quebec.Google Scholar
  24. Royal Society (2006). Science communication. Survey of factors affecting science communication by scientists and engineers. London: Royal Society.Google Scholar
  25. Schiele, B. (2005). Publiciser la science! Pourquoi faire? In I. Pailliart (Ed.) La publicisation de la science. Exposer, communiquer, débattre, publier, vulgariser. Grenoble: PUG, 11–52.Google Scholar
  26. Schiele, B., Amyot, M. & Benoit, C. (1994). Le Québec: historique de la culture scientifique et technologique et bilan de l’action gouvernementale. In B. Schiele, M. Amyot & C. Benoit (Eds.), Quand la science se fait culture. La culture scientifique dans le monde. Actes I. Sainte-Foy: éditions MultiMondes/UQAM/Centre Jacques-Cartier, 13–86.Google Scholar
  27. STC (Science and Technology Council) (1988). Science et technologie. Conjoncture 1988. Situation report. Sainte-Foy: Government of Quebec.Google Scholar
  28. STC (Science and Technology Council) (2002a). Enquête sur la culture scientifique et technique des Québécoises et des Québécois. Sainte-Foy: Government of Quebec.Google Scholar
  29. STC (Science and Technology Council) (2002b). La culture scientifique et technique au Québec: Bilan. Sainte-Foy: Government of Quebec.Google Scholar
  30. STC (Science and Technology Council) (2004a). La culture scientifique et technique. Une interface entre les sciences, la technologie et la société. Situation report. Sainte-Foy: Government of Quebec.Google Scholar
  31. STC (Science and Technology Council) (2004b). L’avenir de la main-d’œuvre hautement qualifiée. Une question d’ajustements. Advisory report. Sainte-Foy: Government of Quebec.Google Scholar
  32. Tremblay, V. & Roy, J. (1985). Sondage d’opinion en matière de science et technologie. Government of Quebec.Google Scholar
  33. Valenduc, G. & Vendramin, P. (1997). La recherche scientifique et la demande sociale. Namur: Fondation travail-université ASBL, Union of International Associations.Google Scholar
  34. Vetenskap och Allmänhet (2003). Dialogue between researchers and the public. How researchers view public and science, 2003—interview survey. Report 2003: 4, Stockholm.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Science and Technology Council of QuebecCanada

Personalised recommendations