Advertisement

Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Livelihoods in Tropical Forest Landscapes

  • Jean-Laurent Pfund
  • Piia Koponen
  • Trudy O’Connor
  • Jean-Marc Boffa
  • Meine van Noordwijk
  • Jean-Pierre Sorg

Abstract

In developing countries, much remains to be done to truly integrate the livelihoods of rural people and biodiversity conservation into land use decision-making and management processes. Yet, research institutions can support informed landscape management decisions by communities, conservation agencies and policy-makers. This can be accomplished by developing methods and instruments that facilitate coherent linkages between stakeholders across various spatial and decisional scales. Researchers need to facilitate equitable participation in the planning processes and provide information on the options that best integrate biodiversity conservation and livelihoods. This chapter aims to analyse how research has contributed to this objective and how it could be designed for future integrative activities at the landscape level. It identifies lessons from case studies that combine biodiversity conservation and livelihood aims in tropical regions and reviews methodological issues relevant to transdisciplinary research. In addition to the critical elements emerging from case studies, the article highlights the crucial role of institutions in helping to bridge the gaps between science, planning, decision-making and effective management. Finally, it describes an approach that two international research organizations are developing to promote the sustainable use of forests and trees and biodiversity conservation in fragmented tropical forest landscapes.

Keywords

Local People Biodiversity Conservation Landscape Level Sustainable Livelihood Landscape Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams WM (1995) Green development theory? Environmentalism and sustainable development. In: Crush J (ed) Power of development, London, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahern J (2004) Theories, methods and strategies for sustainable land use planning. In: Tress B, Tress G, Fry G et al (eds) Proceedings of the Frontis workshop from landscape research to landscape planning: Aspects of integration, education and application, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartholemew K, Henderson A, Marcia J (2000) Coded semi-structured interviews in social psychological research. In: Rees H, Judd C (eds) Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Bengtsson J, Angelstam P, Elmqvist T et al (2003) Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. Ambio 32(6):390–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandon KE, Wells M (1994) Planning for people and parks: design dilemmas. World Dev 20:557–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown J, Mitchell N, Beresford M (eds) (2005) The protected landscape approach – linking nature, culture and community. IUCN, The World Conservation Union. Gland, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown S, Palola E, Lorenzo M (2006) The possibility of plantations: Integrating ecological forestry into plantation systems. National Wildlife Federation. Available via Plantations 2020. http://www.plantations2020.com.au/assets/acrobat/PossibilityofPlantations.pdf.
  8. Brundtland GH (ed) (1987) Our common future. United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford Univ. Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Cabalzar G (1996) Le milieu humain. In: Ganzhorn JU, Sorg J-P (eds) Ecology and economy of a tropical dry forest in Madagascar, primate report, special issue 46–1, pp 13–19Google Scholar
  10. Campbell B, Sayer JA (eds) (2003) Integrated natural resources management: Linking productivity, the environment and development. CAB International with Center for international forestry research. Wallingford, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Carey AB (2006) Active and passive forest management for multiple values. Northwest Nat 87:18–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F et al (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. P Natl Acad Sci 100:8086–8091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapin III FS, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT et al (2000) Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen J, Saunders SC (2006) Ecology of multiple ecosystems in time and space. In: Chen J, Saunders SC, Brosofske KD et al (eds) Ecology to hierarchical landscapes: from theory to application, Nova Publishing, CarbondaleGoogle Scholar
  15. Chomitz K (2006) At Loggerheads? Agricultural expansion, poverty reduction, and environment in the tropical forests. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. Clergue B, Amiaud B, Pervanchon F et al (2005) Biodiversity: function and assessment in agricultural areas, a review. Agron sustain dev 25:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Colfer CJP (2005) The complex forest: Communities, uncertainty and adaptive collaborative management. Resources for the Future and Center for international forestry research, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (1999) Managing earth’s ecosystems: an interdisciplinary challenge. Ecosystems 2:277–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Damschen EI, Haddad NM, Orrock JL, Tewksbury JJ, Levey DJ (2006) Corridors increase plant species richness at large scales. Science 313:1284–1286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dudley N, Aldrich M (2007) Five years of implementing forest landscape restoration – lessons to date. WWF International. http://assets.panda.org/downloads/flrlessonslearntbooklet.pdf
  21. Dunn K (2002) Interviewing: Qualitative research methods in human geography. vol I. Melbourne, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferraro PJ, Kiss A (2002) Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science 298:1718–1719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flyvbjerg B (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual Inq 12(2):219–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio (31):5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Frost P, Campbell B, Medina G, Usongo L (2006) Landscape-scale approaches for integrated natural resource management in tropical forest landscapes. Ecol Soc 11(2):30. http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art30/ Google Scholar
  27. Gerber JF, Steppacher R (2007) Propriété contre possession: les conflits liés aux plantations industrielles d’arbres. Swiss Forestry J 158(3–4):64–69Google Scholar
  28. Globescan (2004) Results of first-ever global poll on humanity’s relationship with nature. http://www.globescan.com/news_archives/IUCN_PR.html
  29. Hadorn GH, Bradley D, Pohl C et al (2006) Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecol Econ 60:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Hanski I (2005) Landscape fragmentation, biodiversity loss and the societal response. EMBO Rep 6(5):388–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hanski I, Ovaskainen O (2000) The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404:755–758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hartanto H (2003) Facilitating collaboration and partnerships: lessons from adaptive collaborative management in the Philippines. ETFRN News 39–40:118–120Google Scholar
  34. Harwood RR, Kassam AH (eds) (2003) Research towards integrated natural resources management: examples of research problems, approaches and partnerships in action in the CGIAR. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  35. Hayes TM (2006) Parks, people and forest protection: an institutional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas. World Dev 34(12):2064–2075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hilty JA, Lidicker WZ, Merenlender AM (2006) Corridor Ecology: The science and practice of linking landscapes for biodiversity conservation. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  37. Horlick-Jones T, Sime J (2004) Living on the border: knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity. Futures 36:441–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Imbernon J, Branthomme A (2001) Characterization of landscape patterns of deforestation in tropical rain forests. Int J Remote Sensing 22(9):1753–1765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. IUCN (2003) The Durban Link. Strengthening protected areas. Ten target areas for action in the next decade. http://www.iucn.org/themes/wcpa/wpc2003/pdfs/outputs/durbanlink/action_ plan_eng.pdf
  40. Jantsch E (1970) Inter- and transdisciplinary university: a systems approach to education and innovation. Policy Sci 1:403–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jepson P, Jarvie JK, MacKinnon K, Monk KA (2001) The end for Indonesia’s lowland forests? Science 292(5518):859–861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kanbur R, Venables AJ (2005) Rising spatial disparities and development. UNU Policy Brief. http://www.unu.edu
  43. Karsenty A (2004) Des rentes contre le développement? Les nouveaux instruments d’acquisition mondiale de la biodiversité et l’utilisation des terres dans les pays tropicaux. Mondes dev 127(3):1–9Google Scholar
  44. Kleijn W, Sutherland DJ (2003) How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? J Appl Ecol 40:947–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Klein JT (2004) Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures 36:515–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Koehler P, Chave J, Riéra B et al (2003) Simulating the long-term response of tropical wet forests to fragmentation. Ecosystems 6(2):114–128Google Scholar
  47. Lamb D, Gilmour D (2003) Rehabilitation and restoration of degraded forests. IUCN, The World Conservation Union, GlandGoogle Scholar
  48. Lambin EF, Geist HJ, Lepers E (2003) Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annu Rev Env Resour 28:205–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Levins R (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. B Entomol Soc Am 15:237–240Google Scholar
  50. Li H, Wu J (2004) Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landscape Ecol 19:389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF (2002) Conserving forest biodiversity: a comprehensive multiscaled approach. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  52. Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF, Fischer J (2006) General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 131:433–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Loucks C, Springer J, Palminteri S et al (2004) From the vision to the ground: A guide to implementing ecoregion conservation in priority areas. WWF US Conservation Science Program, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  54. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  55. Mansourian S, Vallauri D, Dudley N (eds) in cooperation with WWF International (2005) Forest Restoration in landscapes. Beyond planting trees. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253Google Scholar
  57. Marjokorpi A (2006) Biodiversity management in fast-growing tree plantations: a case study from West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Dissertation, Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, Series All, part 200, TurkuGoogle Scholar
  58. McCauley DJ (2006) Selling out nature. Nature 443:7Google Scholar
  59. McIntyre S, Hobbs RJ (1999) A framework for conceptualizing human effects on landscapes and its relevance to management and research models. Conserv Biol 13:1282–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Morrison SA, Reynolds MD (2006) Where to draw the line: integrating feasibility into connectivity planning. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan M (eds) Connectivity conservation. Conserv Biol 14, Cambridge University Press, pp 536–554Google Scholar
  61. Muttenzer F (2006) Déforestation et droit coutumier à Madagascar. L’historicité d’une politique foncière. Dissertation, Institut universitaire d’études du développement, Université de GenèveGoogle Scholar
  62. Naughton-Treves L, Alvarez N, Brandon K et al (2006) Expanding protected areas and incorporating human resource use: a study of 15 forest parks in Ecuador and Peru. Sustainability: Science, practice and policy 2(2):32–44Google Scholar
  63. Naveh Z (2001) Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 57:269–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nicolescu B (2005) Towards transdisciplinary education. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa 1:5–16Google Scholar
  65. Opdam P, Foppen R, Vos C (2002) Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 16:767–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ostrom E (1995) A framework relating human ‘driving forces’ and their impact on biodiversity. Paper presented at the Smithsonian/Man and the Biosphere Biodiversity Program International Symposium “Measuring and monitoring forest biological diversity: The international network of biodiversity plots, Washington, DC, May 23–25, 1995Google Scholar
  67. Peluso NL (1993) Coercing conservation? The politics of state resource control. Global Environ Chang 3:199–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pfund J-L, Boffa J-M, Koponen P, O’Connor T (2006) Report on workshop to launch the CIFOR and ICRAF biodiversity platform. 2nd – 5th March 2006. http://www. worldagroforestry.org/SEA/Publications/searchpub.asp?publishid=1453
  69. Piaget J (1972) The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. In: Interdisciplinarity: problems of teaching and research in universities. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  70. Purnomo H, Guizol P (2006) Simulating forest plantation co-management with a multi-agent system. Math Comput Model 44:535–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Purnomo H, Mendoza RA, Prabhu R (2004) Model for collaborative planning of community managed resources based on soft systems approach. J Trop Sci 16:106–131Google Scholar
  72. Reid WV (2006) Nature: the many benefits of ecosystem services. Nature 443Google Scholar
  73. Rouget M, Cowling RM, Lombard AT et al (2006) Designing large-scale conservation corridors for pattern and process. Conserv Biol 20(2):549–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sanjayan MA, Shen S, Janssen M (1997) Experiences with integrated-conservation development projects in Asia. World Bank technical paper 368Google Scholar
  75. Saunders CD, Brook AT, Myers OE (2006) Using psychology to save biodiversity and human well-being. Conserv Biol 20(3):702–705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sayer JA, Campbell BM (2003) Research to integrate productivity enhancement, environmental protection, and human development. In: Sayer JA, Cambpell BM (eds) Integrated natural resource management: linking productivity, the environment and development. CABI Published in association with the CIFOR, Trowbridge, Wallingford, Oxon, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  77. Sheil D, Puri R, Wan M et al (2006) Recognizing local people’s priorities for tropical forest biodiversity. Ambio 35:17–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Siitonen P (2003) Reserve network design in fragmented forest landscapes. Dissertation, University of HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  79. Sillitoe P (2004) Interdisciplinary experiences: working with indigenous knowledge in development. Interdiscipl Sci Rev 29:1–18Google Scholar
  80. Sorg J-P (2006) Orientations nouvelles de la recherche dans la zone des forêts denses sèches à Madagascar. In Schwitzer C, Brandt S, Ramilijaona O et al (eds) Proceedings of the German-Malagasy research cooperation in life and earth sciences. Concept Verlag, Berlin, pp 67–71Google Scholar
  81. Tomich T, Alegre J, Areskoug V et al (2006) The challenges of integration: report of an on-line consultation among researchers of the alternatives to slash-and-burn (ASB) programme. http://www.maweb.org/documents/bridging/papers/Tomich.tom.pdf
  82. Tomich TP, van Noordwijk M, Vosti S et al (1998) Agricultural development with rainforest conservation: methods for seeking best bet alternatives to slash-and-burn, with applications to Brazil and Indonesia. Agr Econ 19:159–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tress B, Tress G (2001) Capitalising on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research. Landsc Urban Plan 57:143–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tress B, Tress G, Décamps H, d’Hauteserre A-M (2001) Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research. Landsc Urban Plan 57:137–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Turner M (2005) Landscape ecology: what is the state of science? Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:319–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Vanclay J, Sinclair F, Prabhu R (2003) Modelling interactions amongst people and forest resources at the landscape scale small-scale forest economics. Manage Pol 2:117–121Google Scholar
  87. van Noordwijk M (2001) Understanding local action and its consequences for global concerns in a forest margin landscape: the FALLOW model as a conceptual model of transitions from shifting cultivation. In: van Noordwijk M, Williams S, Verbist B (eds) Towards integrated natural resource management in forest margins of the humid tropics: local action and global concerns. Lecture Note 11. ASB Teaching MaterialGoogle Scholar
  88. van Noordwijk M (2005) RUPES typology of environmental services worthy of reward. The World Agroforestry Centre, BogorGoogle Scholar
  89. van Noordwijk M, Villamor G, Leimona B et al (2006) Criteria and indicators for ecosystem reward and compensation mechanisms: realistic, voluntary, conditional and pro-poor. SSLWM paper B6, Luang PrabangGoogle Scholar
  90. Wadley RL, Colfer CJP (2004) Conserving nature in culture: case studies from Southeast Asia. Hum Ecol 32(3):313–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wells M, Guggenheim S, Khan A et al (1999) Investing in biodiversity: A review of Indonesia’s integrated conservation and development projects. The World Bank report, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  92. Wollenberg E, Edmunds D, Buck L (2000) Anticipating change: Scenarios as a tool for adaptive forest management, a guide. Center for international forestry research, BogorGoogle Scholar
  93. WRI (2005) Millenium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystem and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washingtom DCGoogle Scholar
  94. Wu J, Hobbs R (2002) Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis. Landsc Ecol 17:355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wunder S (2006) Are direct payments for environmental services spelling doom for sustainable forest management in the tropics? Ecol Soc 11(2):23. http://www.ecologyandsociety. org/vol11/iss2/art23/ Google Scholar
  96. Zeller M, Lapenu C, Minten B et al (2000) The critical triangle between environmental sustainability, economic growth, and poverty alleviation. In: Minten B, Zeller M (eds) Beyond market liberalization. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Laurent Pfund
    • 1
  • Piia Koponen
  • Trudy O’Connor
  • Jean-Marc Boffa
  • Meine van Noordwijk
  • Jean-Pierre Sorg
  1. 1.CIFOR, Center for International Forestry Research, BogorIndonesia

Personalised recommendations