Systemic Economic Instruments for Energy, Climate, and Global Security

  • James Greyson
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Energy security, climate stability, sustainable development, economic growth and national security are codependent goals; either all will be achieved or none. This global security goal-set will remain elusive with prevailing ‘patchwork’ policy-making. Irreversible failure with one or more of the goals may be avoidable with a non-reductionist approach to global complexity, using systems thinking and systemic interventions at leverage points, of which two are proposed. (1). Weapons spending can be deducted from Gross Domestic Product to define a ‘Gross Peaceful Product’ with which nations could align goals for growth and security. (2). Other global security goals can be approached by a preventive insurance scheme. Significant producers would pay an obligatory premium on all products (including fuels) according to the risk that they become waste in the air, land or water. Premiums would be invested in the capacity of nature, industry and society to reduce that risk. This market-based ‘precycling insurance’ would make many prescriptive instruments redundant. In particular, emissions capping debates need no longer delay international climate agreements.

Keywords

Codependence climate economic growth energy security systems thinking market-based instrument policy Gross Peaceful Product precycling precycling insurance global security sustainable development circular economics conflict 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, D., 2007, Speech to Council on Foreign Relations, Washington DC, UK Department for International Development,12th July2007. www.dfid.gov.uk/news/files/Speeches/council-foreign-relations.asp .
  2. Ayres, R.U., 1998, Turning Point: An End to the Growth Paradigm. St. Martin’s Press, New York, 154Google Scholar
  3. Azar, C., Holmberg J., and Lindgren K., 1996, Socio-ecological Indicators for Sustainability. Ecological Economics, 18, 89-112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertalanffy, L. von, 1950, An Outline of General Systems Theory. British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 1 (2), 134-165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birkeland, J., 2007, GEN 4: Positive Development: Design for Eco-Services. BEDP Envi-ronmental Design Guide, The Royal Australian Institute of Architects, Canberra.Google Scholar
  6. Boulding, K., 1966, The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth. In: Jarrett H (ed.). Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy, Resources for the Future. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, pp. 3-14.Google Scholar
  7. CNA Corporation, 2007, A Study by Eleven Retired US Generals and Admirals. National Security and the Threat of Climate Change. p. 6. www.cna.org
  8. Calvin, W.H., 1989, The Cerebral Symphony. Bantam, New York, pp. 301-316.Google Scholar
  9. Chapman, J., 2002, System Failure: Why Governments Must Learn to Think Differently. DEMOS, 70 pp. www.demos.co.uk/publications/systemfailure
  10. Churchman, C. West, 1979, The Systems Approach and Its Enemies. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Cuellar, M.-F., 2004, Reflections on Sovereignty and Collective Security. Stanford Journal of International Law, 40 (211), 226-227.Google Scholar
  12. G8 Summit Declaration, 2007, Growth and Responsibility in the World Economy. p. 16. www.g-8.de/Webs/G8/EN/
  13. Gallup International, 2007, ‘Voice of the People’ Survey of 55,000 People in 60 Countries. World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  14. Glendinning, C., 1995, Technology, Trauma and the Wild. In: Roszak T. (ed.). Ecopsychology. Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, 54 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Greyson, J., 2007, An Economic Instrument for Zero Waste, Economic Growth and Sustain-ability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1382-1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holmberg, J. and Robèrt, K.-H., 2000, Backcasting - A framework for strategic planning. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 7, 291-308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuznets, S., 1934, National Income, 1929-1932. 73rd US Congress, 2nd Session, Senate Document no. 124, 7 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Max-Neef M., Elizalde A., and Hopenhayn, M., 1991, Human Scale Development. Apex Press, New York.Google Scholar
  19. McDonough, W., and Braungart, M., 2002, Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. North Point Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Meadows, D., 1999, Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. Sustainability Institute, Vermont, p. 1. www.sustainabilityinstitute.org/tools_resources/papers.html
  21. Ny, H., MacDonald, J., Broman, G., Yamamoto, R., and Robèrt, K.-H., 2006, Sustainability Constraints as System Boundaries. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10, 61-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Rorke, M., 1988, Public Information Campaign on Precycling. City of Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  23. Richmond, B., 1993, Systems Thinking: Critical Thinking Skills for the 1990s and Beyond. System Dynamics Review, 9 (2), 113-133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robèrt, K.-H., 1991, The Physician and the Environment. Reviews in Oncology. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, 4 (2), 13.Google Scholar
  25. Schmidt-Bleek, F., 2004, Systemic Fiscal Reforms for a Future. Presentation at Factor 10 Institute, France, 31st May 2004. www.factor10-institute.org/pdf/mipsfuture.pdf
  26. Schwartz, P., and Randall, D., 2003, An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and its Im-plications for United States National Security. US Department of Defense, Pentagon, pp. 16-17. http://www.ems.org/climate/pentagon_climate_change.pdf
  27. Shell, 2007, Global Sustainability Dialogue. www.blindspot.org.uk
  28. Stålenheim, P., Perdomo, C., and Sköns, E., 2007, Military Expenditure. SIPRI Yearbook 2007. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 267-297.Google Scholar
  29. Sterman, J., and Sweeney, L.B., 2007, Understanding Public Complacency About Climate Change: Adults’ Mental Models of Climate Change Violate Conservation of Matter. Climatic Change. Springer, 80, 213-238.Google Scholar
  30. Stern, N., 2007, The Economics of Climate Change: Summary of Conclusions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1 pp.Google Scholar
  31. United Nations Charter,1945, Chapter5. San Francisco, www.un.org/aboutun/charter/chapter5.htm
  32. WEEE, 2002, Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment. European Union, Directive 2002/95/EC. www.europa.eu.int/scadplus/leg/en/lvb/l21210.htm.
  33. Wright, B., 1982, The British Fire Mark: 1680-1879. Woodhead-Faulkner, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Greyson
    • 1
  1. 1.BlindSpotUK

Personalised recommendations