Advertisement

Modelling of Benzo(a)pyrene Depositions over North Sea Coastal Areas: Impact of Emissions from Local and Remote Areas

  • Ines Bewersdorff
  • Armin Aulinger
  • Volker Matthias
  • Markus Quante
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Abstract

The impact of benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) ship emissions on concentration and deposition distributions over Europe and in particular over North Sea coastal areas in comparison to land-based emissions is subject of this study. The carcinogenic BaP belongs to the group of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and is here used as lead substance. A dataset with the ship emissions obtained from a bottom-up approach using ship movement data for the year 2000 derived from Lloyds Marine Intelligence Unit and average engine loads together with BaP emission factors is generated to serve as input for the chemistry transport model. Model runs with datasets including and excluding ship emissions are performed with the Community Multiscale Air Quality modelling system (CMAQ) which is set up on a 54 × 54 km2 grid for Europe. Provisional results show little influence of the BaP ship emissions on deposition and concentration distributions over sea and coastal areas.

Keywords

Benzo(a)pyrene chemical transport modelling persistent organic pollutants ship emissions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Diseases) (1995) Toxicological Profile for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Aulinger A, Matthias V, Quante M (2007) Introducing a Partitioning Mechanism for PAHs into the Community Multiscale Air Quality Modelling System and Its Application to Simulating the Transport of Benzo(a)pyrene over Europe, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 46 (11), 1718-1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Byun D, Ching JKS (1999) Science Algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality Modelling System, EPA report, EPA/600/R-99/030, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC 20406.Google Scholar
  4. Byun D, Schere KL (2006) Review of the Governing Equations, Computational Algorithms, and Other Components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System, Applied Mechanics Reviews 59(2), 51-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper DA, Gustafsson T (2004) Methodology for Calculating Emissions from Ship: 1. Update of Emission Factors, SMHI Swedish Metrological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden.Google Scholar
  6. Corbett JJ, Fischbeck PS (1997) Emissions from Ships, Science 278(5339), 823-234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corbett JJ, Fischbeck PS, Pandis SN (1999) Global Nitrogen and Sulphur Inventories for Oceangoing Ships, J. Geopys. Res. 104 (D3), 3457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corbett JJ, Koehler HW (2003) Updated Emissions from Ocean Shipping, Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 108 (D20), 4650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Denier van der Gon HAC, van het Bolscher M, Visschedijk AJH, Zandveld PYJ (2005) Study of Effectiveness of UNECE Persistent Organic Pollutants Protocol and Cost of Possible Additional Measures. Phase I: Estimation of Emission Reduction Resulting from the Implementation of the POP Protocol, TNO-Report, B&O-A R 2005/194, Appeldoorn, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  10. Doel R, Jørgensen R, Lilley LC, Mann N, Rickeard DJ, Scorletti P, Stradling R, Zemroch PJ (2005) Evaluation of Automotive Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Emissions. Prepared for the CONCAWE Automotive Emissions Managements Group, Report No. 4/05, Brussels.Google Scholar
  11. Grell GA, Dudhia J, Stauffer DR (1995) A Description of the Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model MM5, NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-398 + STR, Boulder, CO, 138 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Isakson J, Persson TA, Selin Lindgren E (2001) Identification and Assessment of Ship Emissions and their Effects in the Harbour of Göteborg, Sweden, Atmospheric Environment 35(21), 3659-3666.Google Scholar
  13. Matthias V, Aulinger A, Quante M (2008) Adapting CMAQ to Investigate Air Pollution in North Sea Coastal Regions, Environmental Modelling and Software 23, 356-368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Otte TL (1999) Developing Meteorological Fields, in Byun DW and Ching JKS Science Algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System, EPA/600/R-99/030, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Pacyna JM, Oehme M (1988) Long-range Transport of Some Organic Compounds to the Norwegian Arctic, Atmospheric Environment 22(2), 243-257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tsyro SG, Berge E (1997) The Contribution of Ship Emission from the North Sea and the North-eastern Atlantic Ocean to Acidification in Europe. EMEP/ MSC-W Note 4/97. EMEP, Meteorological Synthesizing Centre - West, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  17. Whall C, Cooper D, Archer K, Twigger L, Thurston N, Ockwell D, McIntyre A, Ritchie A (2002) Quantification of Emissions from Ships Associated with Ship Movements between Ports in the European Community, Report for the European Commission, Entec UK Limited, Northwich, Great Britain.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ines Bewersdorff
    • 1
  • Armin Aulinger
    • 1
  • Volker Matthias
  • Markus Quante
  1. 1.Institute for Coastal ResearchGKSS Research CenterGeesthachtGermany

Personalised recommendations