The ice cover on small and large lakes: scaling analysis and mathematical modelling

Chapter
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 199)

Abstract

Lake ice cover is described by its thickness, temperature, stratigraphy and overlying snow layer. When the ratio of ice thickness to lake size is above ∼ 10−5, the ice cover is stable; otherwise, mechanical forcing breaks the ice cover, and ice drifting takes place with lead-opening and ridging. This transition enables a convenient distinction to be made between small and large lakes. The evolution of the ice cover on small lakes is solved by a wholly thermodynamic model, but a coupled mechanical-thermodynamic model is needed for large lakes. The latter indicates a wide distribution of ice thickness, and frazil ice may be formed in openings. Ecological conditions in large lakes differ markedly from those in small lakes because vertical mixing and oxygen renewal may take place during the ice season, and the euphotic zone penetrates well into the water column in thin ice regions. Mesoscale sea ice models are applicable to large lakes with only minor tuning of the key parameters. These model systems are presented and analysed using Lake Peipsi as an example. As the climate changes, the transition size between small and large lake ice cover will change.

Keywords

Large lakes Small lakes Ice Physics Scaling Mathematical modelling Mechanics Thermodynamics 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abgeti, M. D. & J. P. Smol, 1995. Winter limnology: A comparison of physical, chemical and biological characteristics in two temperate lakes during ice cover. Hydrobiologia 304: 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adrian, R., N. Walz, T. Hintze, S. Hoeg & R. Rusche, 1999. Effects of ice duration on plankton succession during spring in shallow polymictic lake. Freshwater Biology 41: 621–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arst, H., A. Erm, M. Leppäranta & A. Reinart, 2006. Radiative characteristics of ice-covered fresh-and brackish-water bodies. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Science. Geology 55: 3–23.Google Scholar
  4. Ashton, G. (ed.), 1986. River and Lake Ice Engineering. Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado.Google Scholar
  5. Bengtsson, L., 1996. Mixing in ice-covered lakes. Hydrobiologia 322: 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burda, N. Yu., 1999. Computer simulation for Ladoga Lake ice dynamics based on remotely sensed data. International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2: 937–939. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Gerard, R., 1990. Hydrology of floating ice. In Prowse, T. D. & C. S. C. Ommanney (eds), Northern Hydrology. Canadian Perspectives. National Hydrology Research Institute, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, 103–134.Google Scholar
  8. Golosov, S., O. A. Maher, E. Schipunova, A. Terzhevik, G. Zdorovennova & G. Kirillin, 2006. Physical background of the development of oxygen depletion in ice-covered lakes. Oecologia (online). DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0543-8.Google Scholar
  9. Hibler, W. D., III, 1979. A dynamic and thermodynamic sea ice model. Journal of Physical Oceanography 9: 815–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Järvinen, M., M. Rask, R. Ruuhijärvi & L. Arvola, 2002. Temporal coherence in water temperature and chemistry under the ice of boreal lakes (Finland). Water Resources 36: 3949–3956.Google Scholar
  11. Leppäranta, M., 1983. A growth model for black ice, snow ice and snow thickness in subarctic basins. Nordic Hydrology 14: 59–70.Google Scholar
  12. Leppäranta, M., 2004. The Drift of Sea Ice. Springer-Praxis, Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar
  13. Leppäranta, M. & P. Kosloff, 2000. The thickness and structure of Lake Pääjärvi ice. Geophysica 36: 233–248.Google Scholar
  14. Leppäranta, M & J. Uusikivi, 2002. The annual cycle of the Lake Pääjärvi ice. Lammi Notes 29: 4–9.Google Scholar
  15. Saloranta, T., 2000. Modeling the evolution of snow, snow ice and ice in the Baltic Sea. Tellus 52A: 93–108.Google Scholar
  16. Stefan, J., 1891. Über die Theorie der Eisbildung, insbesondere über Eisbildung im Polarmeere. Annales Physik, 3rd Series 42: 269–286.Google Scholar
  17. Wake, A. & R. R. Rumer, 1983. Great lakes ice dynamics simulation. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering 109: 86–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang, J., L. A. Mysak & R. G. Ingram, 1994. A numerical simulation of sea ice cover in Hudson Bay. Journal of Physical Oceanography 24: 2515–2533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang, K., M. Leppäranta & T. Kõuts, 2003. A sea ice dynamics model for the Gulf of Riga. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Science. Engineering 9: 107–125.Google Scholar
  20. Wang, K., M. Leppäranta & A. Reinart, 2006a. Modeling ice dynamics in Lake Peipsi. Internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie 29: 1443–1446.Google Scholar
  21. Wang, K., M. Leppäranta & T. Kõuts, 2006b. A study of sea ice dynamic events in a small bay. Cold Regions Science and Technology 45: 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yen, Y.-C., 1981. Review of thermal properties of snow, ice and sea ice. CRREL Report 81-10: 1–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of GeophysicsUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations